This document consists of pages 9 and 10 of a presentation titled 'USA Inc.' produced by the venture capital firm KPCB (Kleiner Perkins). The text outlines the motivation for the report, which is to treat the US government as a business ('USA Inc.') and analyze its financials (income statement and balance sheet) for the benefit of citizens and investors. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020846', indicating it was obtained during a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to documents recovered from Jeffrey Epstein or his associates, though Epstein is not explicitly mentioned in this specific excerpt.
This document is the summary page (page vii) of a report titled 'USA Inc.' produced by the venture capital firm KPCB. The text uses a corporate metaphor to analyze the United States government's financial health, treating citizens as shareholders and the government as a public corporation. It argues for greater transparency and citizen engagement with federal financial data. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document (page 16) appears to be an excerpt from a political science essay or article discussing the Arab Spring protests in Tunisia and Egypt. It analyzes the social dynamics of the uprisings, referencing Wael Ghonim and the role of social media, while applying political theories from Samuel Huntington ('praetorianism') and comparing the events to the French Revolution and the 1952 rise of Nasser. The page bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a larger document production.
This document appears to be page 7 of an essay or article critiquing the American judicial treatment of Dominique Strauss-Kahn. The author argues that DSK was dehumanized and turned into a symbol of privilege and 'arrogant France' rather than being treated as an individual entitled to a fair hearing. The text specifically attacks the 'pornographic' nature of DSK's public humiliation and the conduct of the opposing attorney, Kenneth Thompson.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity