Senator Feinstein
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Senator Kyl
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Senator Kyl
|
Co sponsors |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Congressional Record statement by Sen. Feinstein | US Congress | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Statements by Senators Feinstein and Kyl in the Congressional Record regarding victims' rights. | US Senate (Congressional Re... | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Colloquy between Sen. Kyl and Sen. Feinstein regarding the CVRA. | U.S. Senate | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Congressional statements by Senators Kyl and Feinstein regarding the CVRA. | Congress | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Congressional Record entry regarding CVRA legislative history. | U.S. Congress | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Statements by Senators Feinstein and Leahy recorded in the Congressional Record regarding the CVRA. | US Congress | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Congressional Record entry for statements by Senator Feinstein regarding the CVRA. | US Congress | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Statement by Senator Feinstein in the Congressional Record regarding victims' rights. | US Senate (Congressional Re... | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Passage/Discussion of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) | US Congress | View |
EFTA00013976.pdf
This document is a legal petition filed on July 7, 2008, by attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of 'Jane Doe,' a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The petition seeks to enforce Doe's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically asserting that the US Attorney's Office failed to confer with her regarding ongoing plea negotiations with Epstein. The filing details that Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, and argues that the federal government was on the verge of finalizing a plea deal without victim input.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017766.jpg
This document is page 52 of a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the implementation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It emphasizes the necessity for the judiciary to comprehensively protect victims' rights in federal criminal cases to avoid further congressional intervention. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of materials submitted during a congressional investigation, likely regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017763.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically the victim's right against unreasonable delay in proceedings. It cites Senators Feinstein and Kyl, along with various state statutes, to argue that delays should not occur merely for the convenience of the court or parties. The document bears the name of David Schoen (a known attorney for Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017757.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and 'Proposed Rule 43.1(b)' regarding court procedures when a victim is not notified of proceedings. It argues that conducting trials or sentencings without notifying the victim violates the CVRA. The document bears the name of Epstein attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal reference material or evidence regarding the violation of Epstein's victims' rights under the CVRA during the congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017746.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen, appearing to be part of a House Oversight investigation. It contains an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32. The text argues that probation officers should be required to seek out victim information for presentence reports and quotes Senator Kyl to support the argument that victims have a broad right to be heard in person during sentencing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017734.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, seemingly authored or submitted by David Schoen, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the obligation of prosecutors to inform the court of victim objections to plea agreements. It cites Senator Feinstein and the case *State v. Casey* (Utah 2002), in which Schoen notes he represented the victim. The document argues for a rule change requiring disclosure of victim objections in open court, relevant to the broader context of the Epstein case regarding the secret Non-Prosecution Agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017728.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 14 of 52 in the specific filing) discussing proposals to amend legal rules to incorporate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Rule 2 to ensure fairness to victims and adding a Rule 10.1 regarding notice of proceedings. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as part of a legal argument or evidence file regarding victim rights and notification procedures in the Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017703.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen, which cites a 2007 Utah Law Review article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues for a broad interpretation of a victim's right to be heard in court proceedings, citing legislative history from Senators Feinstein and Kyl. It proposes a new rule (Rule 60(b)) regarding the enforcement of victims' rights and preserving claimed error.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017685.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, signed or submitted by attorney David Schoen, which excerpts a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that victims have a broad right to be heard during sentencing proceedings, including the right to review presentence reports and make sentencing recommendations regarding Federal Sentencing Guidelines. It cites legislative history from Senators Kyl and Feinstein to support the argument that victims should be able to provide information influencing the sentence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017655.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 11(c)(2) regarding plea agreements. It argues that prosecutors should be required to inform the court if a victim objects to a plea deal, citing Senator Feinstein and the case State v. Casey. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen (who represented Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely regarding the handling of victims' rights in the Epstein non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017645.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 874) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critically analyzes the 'Advisory Committee's' narrow interpretation of the Act, contrasting it with the broad legislative intent expressed by Senators Kyl and Feinstein to ensure victims are treated with fairness and due process. The document appears to be part of a production to the House Oversight Committee from the files of David Schoen, a lawyer known for representing Jeffrey Epstein, likely relevant to arguments regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
CVRA legislative intent
Statement regarding the goal of the CVRA to allow victim participation.
CVRA
Statement regarding victim's right to provide information.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity