This document is page 15 of a court filing from October 22, 2021, which lists proposed questions for potential jurors in a criminal case. A comment from the defense argues that juror background questions should be handled through a written questionnaire rather than live questioning (voir dire). The defense supports this by citing precedent from high-profile cases involving Elizabeth Holmes, Robert Kelly, and Keith Rainier, and notes that a verdict in another case was overturned due to jury deceit, highlighting the need for thorough vetting.
This document is page 4 of a proposed juror questionnaire filed in a federal criminal case on October 22, 2021. It contains standard background questions for potential jurors, along with comments reflecting a legal dispute between the defendant and the government. The defense argues for including these detailed questions in the written questionnaire, citing precedent from other high-profile cases, while the government objects, arguing the questions are inappropriate for a written form and are better suited for oral voir dire.
This document is page 4 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 13, 2021. It presents legal arguments justifying the use of jury questionnaires to screen for bias (actual, implied, and inferred) during voir dire. The text cites precedents from the Second Circuit and references other high-profile cases involving extensive pretrial publicity, such as those of Jeffrey Skilling (Enron), R. Kelly, Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos), and Keith Rainier (Nexium), to support the argument.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity