The Nation
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Robert Dreyfuss
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Media support |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Matt Slater
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Matt Slater
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stephen Gillers
|
Contributor author |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00032720.pdf
An email chain from October 22, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Jacklyn Thrapp, a reporter for the National Enquirer, emailed the office asking for confirmation on a rumor that a specific (redacted) individual would not be called to the stand during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Internal staff forwarded the email, and one individual confirmed they would handle the response.
EFTA00026483.pdf
This document is an email chain dated October 22, 2021, originating from Jacklyn Thrapp, a reporter for The National Enquirer. Thrapp contacts officials at USANYS (US Attorney's Office) to verify a rumor that a specific, redacted individual will not be called to the stand during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The email was then forwarded internally by USANYS staff.
EFTA00023181.pdf
An email dated October 22, 2021, from Jacklyn Thrapp, a reporter for The National Enquirer, sent to redacted recipients. Thrapp is inquiring about a rumor that a specific redacted individual will not be called to testify during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and asks for elaboration.
EFTA00011046.pdf
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), dated January 25, 2021, distributing daily news clippings. The email, sent by Spokesman Nicholas Biase, includes a list of hyperlinks to articles from various media outlets covering topics such as the Capitol riot, Donald Trump, and significantly, an article about how Ghislaine Maxwell was located by the FBI via her phone. The recipient list is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00010154.jpg
This document appears to be a page from the Curriculum Vitae or publication list of Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics expert. It lists five publications written by him between 2006 and 2008 in 'The Nation', 'Georgetown J. Legal Ethics', and 'American Lawyer'. The document is marked as an exhibit in a legal case involving the DOJ, originally filed in 2012 and re-filed in 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00010153.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012, which lists publications by Stephen Gillers from 2003 to 2006. The articles, published in various newspapers and legal journals, cover topics such as judicial ethics, the Martha Stewart trial, and judicial nominations including those of Miers and Alito. Several publications were co-authored with D. Luban, S. Lubet, and Deborah Rhode.
DOJ-OGR-00010151.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or bibliography for Stephen Gillers, filed as an exhibit in a legal case (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP). It lists publications authored by Gillers between February 1999 and April 2000, covering topics such as legal ethics, impeachment, Kenneth Starr, and professional responsibility. The document was produced by the DOJ (DOJ-OGR-00010151) and contains headers indicating it was filed in 2012 and re-filed in a 2020 case.
DOJ-OGR-00010150.jpg
This document appears to be a page from the Curriculum Vitae or publication list of legal ethics expert Stephen Gillers, filed as a court exhibit in 2012. It lists articles authored by Gillers between 1997 and 1999, primarily focusing on the legal and ethical aspects of the Clinton impeachment, Kenneth Starr's investigation, and the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The document contains Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00010150.
DOJ-OGR-00010149.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a bibliography of publications by Stephen Gillers from 1993 to 1997. The listed articles, published in various legal journals and newspapers, cover topics such as legal ethics, political controversies like Whitewater and Filegate, and the Clinton administration. The document also references a mock legal appeal based on Shakespeare's Hamlet.
DOJ-OGR-00010147.jpg
This document is page 22 of a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012. It contains a numbered list of publications authored by Stephen Gillers between 1986 and 1988. The articles, published in various newspapers and law journals, cover topics such as legal ethics, lawyer discipline, and commentary on legal figures like Bernhardt Goetz, Meese, and Roy Cohn.
DOJ-OGR-00010146.jpg
This document is a biographical summary for Stephen Gillers, filed as part of a legal case on April 6, 2012. It details his educational background, including his J.D. from NYU Law School in 1968 and B.A. from City University of New York in 1964, along with his date of birth. The document also provides a selected bibliography of articles he authored between 1978 and 1985 for publications such as The Nation, New York Times, and New York Law Journal.
DOJ-OGR-00009474.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or expert report bibliography for legal scholar Stephen Gillers. It lists his publications (items 122-139) between 2003 and 2006, covering topics such as legal ethics, judicial selection, and high-profile cases like Martha Stewart's trial and Supreme Court nominations. The document bears a header indicating it was filed in 2022 as part of the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330), likely as an exhibit related to expert testimony or legal arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00009472.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or bibliography for legal scholar Stephen Gillers, filed as an exhibit in a legal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330, likely US v. Maxwell). It lists publications authored by Gillers between 1999 and 2000 in various legal and news outlets such as The New York Times and The American Lawyer, covering topics like legal ethics, impeachment, and professional responsibility. The page contains a DOJ Bates stamp at the bottom.
DOJ-OGR-00009471.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a bibliography or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, filed as an exhibit in legal proceedings (specifically Case 1:20-cr-00330, the Ghislaine Maxwell case). The page lists publications from 1997 to 1999, the majority of which focus on legal ethics and analysis surrounding the investigation, perjury accusations, and impeachment of President Bill Clinton. The document lists 18 specific articles published in major newspapers and legal journals.
DOJ-OGR-00009469.jpg
This document is a page from a bibliography or Curriculum Vitae for Stephen Gillers, filed as Exhibit A-5865 in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330) on Feb 24, 2021. It lists 19 publications authored by Gillers between 1988 and 1993 in various legal journals and newspapers, covering topics such as legal ethics, prosecutorial conduct, and constitutional rights. The document appears to be part of expert witness credentials submitted to the court.
DOJ-OGR-00009468.jpg
This document appears to be a page from the curriculum vitae or bibliography of Stephen Gillers, filed as an exhibit in court cases (including Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists numbered publications (items 15 through 34) written by Gillers between January 1986 and June 1988, published in various legal and news outlets such as the New York Law Journal and The New York Times. The articles cover topics regarding legal ethics, lawyer discipline, and specific public figures like Bernhardt Goetz and Roy Cohn.
DOJ-OGR-00009467.jpg
This document is a page from the Curriculum Vitae of legal scholar Stephen Gillers, filed as Exhibit A-5863 in court case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details his legal education at NYU Law School and undergraduate degree from CUNY, his date of birth (Nov 3, 1943), and provides a selected bibliography of 14 articles he authored between 1978 and 1985 for publications such as The Nation, The New York Times, and the New York Law Journal. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp indicating it was part of a production by the Department of Justice.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019791.jpg
This document is a proof page (Epilogue, page 303) from a book, stamped by the House Oversight Committee. The file name 'Epst_9780451494566' indicates this is likely from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, rather than a document about Jeffrey Epstein. The text analyzes the public distrust in government following Edward Snowden's NSA leaks, specifically discussing Senator Dianne Feinstein's defense of intelligence programs regarding a 2009 New York subway plot.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019743.jpg
This document appears to be page 255 of a book or report included in a House Oversight investigation file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019743). The text details Edward Snowden's time in Moscow, explaining that his rumored travel to Ecuador was a cover story orchestrated by Julian Assange because Snowden feared CIA rendition in Latin America. It describes the media frenzy surrounding Aeroflot Flight SU150 to Cuba and quotes a July 1, 2013, statement from Snowden criticizing the Obama administration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019667.jpg
This document is page 179 from a book proof (stamped House Oversight Committee, dated 9/29/16) titled 'The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing,' likely authored by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by filename 'Epst'). The text critically analyzes Edward Snowden's claim that he destroyed all NSA documents in Hong Kong before traveling to Russia. The author argues this narrative is self-serving and illogical, citing statements by Anatoly Kucherena and interviews Snowden gave to various journalists (Bamford, Rusbridger, vanden Heuvel, Williams). NOTE: The 'Epst' in the filename refers to author Edward Jay Epstein, not Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019630.jpg
This document is page 142 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, stamped as a House Oversight Committee exhibit. It analyzes Edward Snowden's flight to Russia, comparing it to Cold War spies like Kim Philby to suggest a potential prior intelligence connection. The text disputes Snowden's claim that he was 'trapped' in Russia, detailing how the State Department attempted to facilitate his return to the U.S. to face felony charges, including a specific detail about a typographical error regarding his middle name (James vs. Joseph) in communications with Hong Kong authorities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019597.jpg
This document is page 109 from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer), which is part of a House Oversight Committee file. The text details Edward Snowden's time in Russia, his asylum, the risks taken by his associates like Sarah Harrison and Julian Assange, and his subsequent media appearances and financial earnings ($20,000 from TED). It critiques Snowden's transition from a technician to a media figure and his rhetoric regarding facing prison versus escaping to Russia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019208.jpg
This document is a page from a House Oversight report detailing the timeline and circumstances of Edward Snowden's flight from Hong Kong to Russia in 2013. It refutes Snowden's claim that he was trapped in Russia by the US, presenting evidence that his passport was revoked before he left Hong Kong and that the Russian government (specifically Putin and Aeroflot) facilitated his travel. It also implicates WikiLeaks in funding and assisting his escape and cites Russian officials claiming Snowden shared intelligence with Russian security services.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020513.jpg
This document is page 54 of a report (likely from the House Oversight Committee, given the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT') containing endnotes/references numbered 6 through 21. The citations focus heavily on Chinese political influence in American higher education, specifically regarding Confucius Institutes, the 'Hanban,' and interference on U.S. campuses. While the document is part of a larger dataset often associated with investigations, this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017375.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (page 288), likely written by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the cases mentioned, produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text reflects on the author's experience with high-profile cases, specifically referencing the Woody Allen/Mia Farrow conflict and the Clinton-Lewinsky impeachment. It outlines seven specific rules for lawyers handling celebrity clients, emphasizing the importance of maintaining professional distance, managing media expectations, and delivering hard truths to clients.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity