United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida
OrganizationRelationship Network
016-05.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 30, 2010, by Plaintiff Jane Doe requesting the modification of a court order regarding an upcoming settlement conference with Jeffrey Epstein. Doe requests that Epstein be kept in a secure, separate room to prevent any contact or intimidation, citing his status as a convicted sex offender and previous incidents where he intimidated victims, specifically Jane Doe No. 4, during court proceedings. The motion references Epstein's 2008 guilty plea and strict no-contact orders issued by both state and federal courts.
EFTA00013553.pdf
An email from the First Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to Mr. Lefkowitz (Epstein's attorney) dated May 28, 2008. The email informs Lefkowitz that the compliance deadline for Epstein's plea deal (global resolution) is being postponed because the Deputy Attorney General's office is reviewing the investigation into Epstein's sexual conduct with minors at Lefkowitz's request.
DOJ-OGR-00014854.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal opinion (likely from an appellate court) affirming the conviction and sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court holds that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida does not prevent the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, and confirms that the statute of limitations was not violated. The document also notes Maxwell was fined a total of $750,000 and denied a new trial regarding juror conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00014852.jpg
This legal document is a court opinion regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for conspiracy, transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity, and sex trafficking. Maxwell's appeal raised five issues, including whether Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement barred her prosecution and other procedural matters. The court found no errors in the District Court's handling of the case and affirmed the judgment of conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00001813.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a Government filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on October 30, 2020. It addresses delays in electronic discovery production due to vendor volume and refutes defense accusations regarding the definition of the 'Prosecution Team' and the withholding of exculpatory material. A significant footnote (Footnote 2) argues that the 'genesis' of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Southern District of Florida is irrelevant because the current defendant (Maxwell) was not a party to it, was not named in it, and the agreement covered a different time period.
DOJ-OGR-00000317.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (likely by the DOJ) arguing that the Petitioners' claims are unripe. The government contends that the Petitioners are not precluded from conferring with government attorneys in other districts about pursuing charges against Epstein not covered by the Non-Prosecution Agreement. It cites case law to support the dismissal of claims based on future, hypothetical events.
DOJ-OGR-00000005.jpg
This page from a legal document outlines the issues presented on appeal regarding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, including arguments concerning Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and juror impartiality. The court summarizes its holdings, stating that the NPA did not bind the prosecution in New York, the statute of limitations was not violated, and the motion for a new trial based on juror conduct was properly denied.
DOJ-OGR-00000003.jpg
This legal document is a court opinion dated September 17, 2024, regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction. The document outlines the five legal questions Maxwell raised on appeal, including issues related to Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, the statute of limitations, and jury conduct. The appellate court found no errors in the District Court's proceedings and affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00021076.jpg
This page from a 2023 court filing analyzes the text of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It details that the FBI investigated Epstein for offenses committed between 2001 and 2007, and that the NPA was intended to 'globally' resolve his liability. The text explains that federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida was deferred in favor of state prosecution by Florida, provided Epstein abided by the terms.
DOJ-OGR-00021881.jpg
This document is page 4 of an appellate court decision (likely 2nd Circuit) dated December 2, 2024, affirming the conviction and sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court holds that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida did not prevent the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell. Additionally, the court affirms that the indictment was within the statute of limitations and that the District Court correctly denied a motion for a new trial regarding juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00021879.jpg
This document is Page 2 of an appellate court decision filed on December 2, 2024, affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court rejected Maxwell's five arguments on appeal, including her claim that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement in Florida protected her from prosecution in New York. The court affirmed the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.
DOJ-OGR-00021851.jpg
This is page 4 of a legal opinion (Case 22-1426) affirming the conviction and sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court holds that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement in Florida does not protect Maxwell from prosecution in New York, affirms that the indictment complied with the statute of limitations, and denies that a juror's erroneous answers during voir dire warranted a new trial. The document notes Maxwell was fined a total of $750,000.
DOJ-OGR-00021849.jpg
This page is from an appellate court decision affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her sentence (concurrent terms totaling 240 months) for sex trafficking and conspiracy charges. The court rejects her five grounds for appeal, which included arguments about Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and jury impartiality.
DOJ-OGR-00021832.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal brief filed on November 1, 2024, discussing the legal interpretation of Jeffrey Epstein's September 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It outlines the background of the NPA, noting that in exchange for a guilty plea to state charges and an 18-month sentence, the USAO-SDFL agreed not to prosecute Epstein or his potential co-conspirators (referencing four specific but unnamed individuals) for federal offenses committed between 2001 and 2007. The central legal issue presented is whether the Second Circuit's precedent in *Annabi*, which favors the government in ambiguous plea agreements, should be overruled.
DOJ-OGR-00021796.jpg
This document is page 2 of an appellate court opinion affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the charges she was convicted of (sex trafficking, conspiracy), her sentence (concurrent terms up to 240 months), and rejects five specific arguments raised on appeal, including the applicability of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and claims of jury bias. The court concludes by affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022 judgment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016497.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal motion filed by 'The Post' (a media organization) in a New York court. The motion requests the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex-offender registration (SORA) proceedings, with victim names redacted. It details procedural history, including the withdrawal of a previous motion from December 21 to resolve disputes over notifying Florida prosecutors, and notes the Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Friedman Agnifilo's stance on the unsealing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity