| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jean Luc Brunel
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jean Luc Brunel
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jean-Luc
|
Founder owner |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jean-Luc
|
Association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jean-Luc Brunel
|
Founder owner |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEAN LUC BRUNEL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jean-Luc Brunel
|
Owner co owner |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Form I-129 | USCIS | View |
| 2019-04-24 | N/A | Florida's Third District Court of Appeal rules that MC2 failed to properly serve Epstein. | Florida | View |
| 2015-01-26 | N/A | E-Filing of Amended Verified Complaint | Dade County, Florida | View |
This document is a compilation of FBI internal memos, administrative forms, and news clippings related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein between 2006 and 2011. It covers the FBI's monitoring of the state case, the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement, victim notification procedures, and the prosecution of Epstein's butler, Alfredo Rodriguez, for obstruction of justice. Significant portions include news articles detailing allegations by Virginia Roberts regarding Prince Andrew and the operations of the MC2 modeling agency.
This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.
This document is a Motion to Compel filed on July 10, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida, requesting the court to force Jeffrey Epstein to answer 23 specific requests for admission in a civil suit brought by Jane Doe No. 2. Epstein had previously asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to refuse answering questions regarding his net worth (alleged to be over $1 billion), his financial support of modeling agency MC2, his ownership of foreign property, and specific allegations of sexual assault, battery, and sex trafficking of minors. The plaintiff argues that the Fifth Amendment cannot be used as a blanket refusal in a civil case and demands Epstein answer or provide specific justification for his silence.
This legal filing is a Motion to Compel submitted by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests the court to order Epstein to answer 23 specific requests for admission regarding his net worth, asset transfers, and allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking of minors, which he had previously refused to answer by asserting Fifth Amendment privileges. The plaintiff argues that Epstein's blanket assertion of the privilege is improper and that he must provide a particularized justification for each refusal or face an adverse inference.
This document is a Motion to Compel filed on July 10, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The motion seeks to force Epstein to answer 23 specific Requests for Admission regarding his net worth (specifically if it exceeds $1 billion), his financial support of modeling agency MC2, his ownership of Caribbean property, and specific allegations of sexual battery, assault, and sex trafficking of minors. Epstein had previously refused to answer these questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
This document is a legal filing from Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000's counsel requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants (Epstein's executors Indyke and Kahn) to produce discovery documents and answer interrogatories. The filing includes exhibits of the discovery requests, which seek detailed information on Epstein's flight logs, financial transactions, communications with high-profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz), and the structure of his alleged sex-trafficking operation. The Defendants have objected to almost all requests, claiming they are overbroad or that they lack knowledge because Epstein is deceased, prompting the Plaintiff to seek court intervention. Note: While flight logs are requested, no actual flight data is contained in this document.
An email chain from April 2019 originating from Conchita Sarnoff, forwarding a Miami Herald article about a new Epstein accuser. Sarnoff highlights allegations that victims were lured with promises of modeling for Victoria's Secret or MC2 (owned by an Epstein associate). A Criminal Division official forwards this internally, noting they are glad the 'investing' (likely investigating) continues to advance.
This document contains a 2019 email chain from Boies Schiller Flexner discussing Jeffrey Epstein's use of pseudo email accounts to communicate. Attached are historical emails from September 2005 demonstrating Epstein's use of these accounts (likely ending in @gmail.com and @ellmax.com). The attachments show Ed Razek (L Brands) forwarding an investment opportunity from William Mook to Epstein, and Mike O'Neil inviting Epstein to a Trilateral Commission meeting in Montreal. The document also includes text from a Bloomberg article detailing Epstein's connections to Les Wexner, Victoria's Secret models, and his use of Wexner's Boeing 727.
This document is an email forwarding a Law360 article dated April 24, 2019, detailing a legal victory for Jeffrey Epstein. A Florida appeals court ruled that Jean-Luc Brunel's modeling agency, MC2, failed to properly serve Epstein with a lawsuit because they served his business address rather than his primary residence on Little St. James. The article also references the wider context of Epstein's legal history, including the 2007 plea deal involving Alexander Acosta and allegations connecting Brunel to Epstein's trafficking ring.
The document contains pages from the book 'Filthy Rich' (page 285), stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the fallout for Jean-Luc Brunel, who sued his former friend Jeffrey Epstein for emotional distress and loss of business for his modeling agency, MC2, due to the association with Epstein's crimes. The text explicitly quotes Brunel acknowledging the extreme nature of Epstein's sexual abuse of minors while denying his own involvement. It also briefly mentions personnel changes within the Palm Beach Police Department, including a Detective 'Joe' receiving honors at Mar-a-Lago.
This document is an excerpt from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich'), page 284, included in House Oversight records. It details the post-investigation careers of Palm Beach police officers Joe Recarey and Michael Reiter, noting Recarey received an award at Mar-a-Lago in 2012. The text also discusses a January 2015 lawsuit filed by modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel against his 'old friend' Jeffrey Epstein, claiming Epstein's scandal cost Brunel millions in business and caused him severe emotional distress.
This document appears to be a scanned excerpt (pages 8 and 129) from a book, likely 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It details Jeffrey Epstein's lifestyle, high-profile parties, and the role of Nadia Marcinkova, who is identified as a girlfriend and an alleged accomplice in sexual assaults on minors. The text also briefly mentions legal motions filed by 'Brunel' (Jean-Luc Brunel) in 2015 regarding his association with Epstein.
This document is a page from a James Patterson book (likely 'Filthy Rich') stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It details the fallout of the Epstein scandal on model agent Jean-Luc Brunel, including business losses and a 2015 lawsuit Brunel filed against Epstein alleging obstruction of justice. A sidebar profile discusses Nadia Marcinkova, identifying her as a model who allegedly became a willing accomplice in Epstein's abuse of underage females.
This document is an excerpt from a book by James Patterson (likely 'Filthy Rich'), marked as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. It details the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein, Leslie Wexner, and French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel. The text describes how Epstein used his connection to Wexner (Victoria's Secret) and his financial backing of Brunel's agencies (Karin, MC2) to access models, with allegations of visa manipulation and exploitation of young women from former Soviet republics.
This document appears to be a page from a larger report (likely House Oversight, based on the footer) containing 'Chapter 31'. It reproduces a text excerpt from a January 30, 2009, article in 'Fashionista' by Julia Hermanns. The text is a job posting seeking interns for the NYC branch of Mc2 Model Management. It notably highlights that the agency was founded by Jean-Luc Brunel and emphasizes his history of signing Christy Turlington at age 14. The posting lists administrative duties and offers a stipend/Metrocard.
This document appears to be a page from a book (likely 'Filthy Rich' or similar investigative work) included in a House Oversight file. It details the lifestyle of Jeffrey Epstein, his travel habits, and the high-profile nature of his parties in New York. Specifically, it focuses on Nadia Marcinkova, describing her as a girlfriend of Epstein and alleging, based on Palm Beach police statements, that she was a willing accomplice in the sexual assault of underage females. The partial text on the left page references Jean-Luc Brunel and legal motions filed in 2015 regarding depositions and his association with Epstein.
This document is a page from a James Patterson book (page 128) submitted as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. It details the fallout for Jean-Luc Brunel, noting that agencies like Modilinos Model Management cut ties with him, and describes a 2015 civil lawsuit Brunel filed against Epstein alleging obstruction of justice and reputation damage. The adjacent page fragment introduces Nadia Marcinkova, describing her as a model who became a willing accomplice in Epstein's abuse of underage females.
This document, an excerpt from the book "Filthy Rich," discusses the relationship between modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Epstein. It details allegations from a court filing by lawyer Bradley Edwards that the two men used Brunel's agency, MC2 (formerly Karin), to traffic underage girls into the United States under the guise of modeling contracts, a claim Brunel strongly denies in the text.
This document is an excerpt from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' (marked as House Oversight evidence) discussing the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein, Leslie Wexner, and French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel around 2005. It details how Epstein leveraged his connection to Wexner (Victoria's Secret) and his financial backing of Brunel's agencies (Karin, MC2) to access models, noting Brunel's history of alleged sexual exploitation dating back to a 1988 '60 Minutes' investigation. The text highlights Brunel scouting in former Soviet republics and Epstein paying for models' support and housing.
This document appears to be a page (125) from a larger report or book, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It reproduces a job posting from January 30, 2009, by Julia Hermanns in 'Fashionista' seeking interns for Mc2 Model Management's NYC branch. The text explicitly highlights that the agency was founded by Jean-Luc Brunel and notes his history of signing models at a young age (specifically Christy Turlington at 14).
An email chain from January 2015 labeled as Exhibit S. Erik Bechtol of Page Parkes Houston emails Abi Schwinck stating that a model named Victoria is uncomfortable remaining with MC2 due to 'drama going on right now in the press.' Abi Schwinck forwards this notification to Jean Luc Brunel, Jeff Fuller, and 'Pink'.
This document is a photograph of a computer screen labeled 'EXHIBIT Q', displaying an email with the subject 'FW - Links'. The email contains a list of internet search results that repeatedly associate Jean-Luc Brunel and his MC2 modeling agency in Miami Beach with keywords related to 'escorts' and 'escort agencies' in various Florida locations (Orlando, Miami Beach, North Miami Beach). The footer identifies the document as part of a House Oversight investigation.
This document is a psychotherapy progress note from Dynamic Behavioral Consulting dated December 12, 2014, for Jean Luc Brunel. In the session, Brunel discusses his depression stemming from business losses at his agency, MC2, caused by 'slanderous' sex-trafficking allegations that surfaced after he visited a friend (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) in jail following the friend's 2008 sex offense conviction. The psychologist, Dr. Reyes N. Alazo, notes Brunel's hyperverbal and dramatic behavior, diagnosing him with an unspecified personality disorder and adjustment disorder.
A letter from Jeff Fuller, President of MC2 Model Management USA, to a business partner (likely Jean-Luc Brunel given the MC2/Epstein context, though unnamed here). Fuller expresses deep concern that negative information about the partner on the internet is damaging the company's global brand. He urges the partner to get the information offline to repair their reputation and suggests seeking professional help for depression.
An email from Jeff Fuller to Jean Luc Brunel dated November 12, 2014, discussing the severe business impact on their modeling agency, MC2, caused by Brunel's association with Jeffrey Epstein. Fuller notes that despite Brunel not being convicted of a crime, the 'guilty by association' perception and online articles (specifically mentioning Conchita Sarnoff) have stunted the agency's growth for years and hindered model recruitment. The email also lists major American retailers (Target, Macy's, etc.) who are clients, noting concern that these companies are disassociating from the agency due to reputation risks.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity