Household Staff
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employer protector |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employer co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Employer contractor |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Recruiting of minor girls | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Criminal activity timeframe | Various households | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016200.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Visoski - direct examination) filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, a pilot named Visoski, testifies about the layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property (main house, cabana, staff house) and specific airport procedures at West Palm Beach International Airport between 1994 and 2004. The testimony details how vehicles were allowed to bypass standard terminals and drive directly to the aircraft's door, noting that tinted windows often obscured the pilot's view of passengers inside the cars.
DOJ-OGR-00011755.jpg
This document is a page from the court testimony of a pilot named Visoski (likely David Visoski) in the case US v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Visoski describes the layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property, specifically the addition of a third structure for staff housing in the 2000s. He also details security procedures at West Palm Beach International Airport between 1994 and 2004, noting that vehicles were allowed to bypass the terminal and drive directly to the aircraft on the tarmac by providing the tail number to security.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013384.jpg
This page from a legal filing (likely by attorney Brad Edwards) argues that discovery efforts targeting Jeffrey Epstein's friends were necessary and valid. It highlights that Epstein and his household staff—who helped recruit minor girls—pleaded the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions about activities at the West Palm Beach mansion. The document asserts that evidence of other sexual abuse is admissible to prove modus operandi or motive.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029321.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's use of the Fifth Amendment and obstructionist tactics (including securing lawyers for staff who recruited girls) creates an adverse inference of guilt. It states that attorney Bradley Edwards was pursuing discovery to prove Epstein was a 'serial molester' and discusses the admissibility of evidence regarding Epstein's abuse of other minors to establish modus operandi. The document cites case law supporting the use of adverse inferences in civil cases when a party refuses to testify.
Household Manual
A manual allegedly instructing staff behavior; defense claims it was thrown away and not used.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity