Trove
Sign In Sign Up

U.S. court

Organization
Mentions
8
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
U.S. Courts, Southern District of New York U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit USCA (U.S. Court of Appeals) U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Cir.)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00021057.jpg

This document is page 'ix' from a legal filing, specifically Document 59 in Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It serves as a table of authorities, listing numerous U.S. court cases with their legal citations and corresponding page references within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1926 to 2017 and originate from various federal district and circuit courts.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00019712.jpg

This document is a court docket entry dated January 12, 2021, recording the transmission of the appeal record to the U.S. Court of Appeals (USCA). It specifies that the certified indexed record regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's Notice of Appeal (entry 113) has been electronically transmitted.

Court docket entry / procedural record
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00025263.jpg

This document is an email dated August 14, 2019, in which a redacted sender forwards an earlier email to James Petrucci. The original email, dated August 12, 2019, concerns the legal case "Jeffrey Epstein 19 cr 490" and was circulated among individuals with email addresses at the Bureau of Prisons (bop.gov), the Southern District of New York courts (nysd.uscourts.gov), and the Department of Justice (usdoj.gov). The actual content of the messages is not included, only the email headers.

Email
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376.jpg

This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (specifically 2012 WL 257568) regarding the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It details procedural history concerning the dismissal of claims against numerous defendants, including Saudi banks (Al Rajhi, SAMBA), organizations (Saudi Red Crescent), and individuals (multiple members of the Bin Laden family). The text discusses the impact of the 'Doe v. Bin Laden' decision on jurisdictional arguments under the FSIA (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) and mentions motions to vacate previous dismissals. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376).

Legal document / court brief / westlaw record
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search