Trove
Sign In Sign Up

HRM

Organization
Mentions
8
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, PL
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

025.pdf

This document is an unopposed motion filed on November 29, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team requesting a 10-day extension to respond to two plaintiff motions regarding protective orders and evidence preservation. The motion states that the parties are currently in discussions to resolve the matters and that plaintiff's counsel, Gary Farmer, does not oppose the extension. The document lists M.J. as the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen as defendants.

Legal pleading (motion for extension of time)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

014.pdf

A legal motion filed on November 10, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys requesting the court to quash service of process in the case of M.J. v. Epstein. The defense argues that leaving an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of Epstein's New York vacation home and claiming to leave papers with a non-existent person named 'Mark' violates Federal, New York, and Florida service laws. The document includes arguments citing specific statutes and an affidavit from Richard Barnett denying the presence of anyone named 'Mark' at the residence.

Legal motion (renewed motion to quash service of process)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

007.pdf

This document is a Motion to Quash Service of Process filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on October 29, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's lawyers argue that the plaintiff, 'M.J.', failed to properly serve Epstein with the lawsuit because the documents were merely left in an unmarked envelope in the mailbox of his New York residence (9 East 71st Street) rather than being delivered personally as required by law. The document details the specific dates of the attempted service and cites Florida, New York, and Federal laws to support the argument that the service was legally ineffective.

Legal motion (motion to quash service of process)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

EFTA00036565.pdf

This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) email chain dated August 13, 2019, three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. It contains a list of 10 specific questions directed to various BOP departments (HRM, NER, IPPA) investigating staffing levels, overtime practices, and inmate counts at MCC New York. Crucially, question #5 explicitly asks for the planned versus actual staff counts for the shifts on Friday, August 9, and the overnight shift into Saturday, August 10, the timeframe of Epstein's suicide.

Email chain / government correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search