Matthew Kleban
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ellis
|
Professional academic debate |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Publication of a 'new issue' and the 'fifth issue' of 'Inference: International Review of Science... | Not applicable | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022453.jpg
This document is a page of testimonials for the publication 'Inference: International Review of Science', featuring positive feedback from academics William Kininmonth, Matthew Kleban, Lawrence Krauss, and Martin Krieger. The document's relevance to the Epstein case stems from the endorsement by Lawrence Krauss, a known associate of Jeffrey Epstein, for a journal that was reportedly funded by Epstein. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022453' indicates this page was part of evidence submitted to a congressional committee.
Feedback on fifth issue of Inference and debate with Ellis
Praised the fifth issue and commented on a 'dishonest' criticism from 'Ellis', expressing gladness that the debate is in a serious publication.
Feedback on fifth issue of Inference and debate with Ellis
Praised the fifth issue and commented on a 'dishonest' criticism from 'Ellis', expressing gladness that the debate is in a serious publication.
Feedback on fifth issue of Inference and debate with Ellis
Praised the fifth issue and commented on a 'dishonest' criticism from 'Ellis', expressing gladness that the debate is in a serious publication.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity