Clinton campaign
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Steele dossier's British author
|
Financial |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026625.jpg
An email dated October 18, 2016, from attorney Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein containing a link to a YouTube video titled 'Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies.' Indyke comments 'Hysterical' in the body of the email, which is marked as High importance. The document includes Indyke's professional signature block and a standard legal disclaimer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026494.jpg
This document is a page from a House Oversight report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026494) arguing that the 'Crossfire' (Crossfire Hurricane) investigation into the Trump campaign was politically motivated rather than based on national security. It cites a 2012 Eric Holder memo regarding DOJ impartiality during election years and contrasts the handling of the Clinton email server investigation with the Trump-Russia probe. It asserts there was no discernible evidence of collusion when Crossfire was launched and notes that the Clinton campaign funded the Steele dossier.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026487.jpg
This document, originating from House Oversight records, argues that the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign was politically motivated and lacked evidence of collusion at its inception. It contrasts the handling of the Trump investigation with the Clinton email investigation and highlights financial ties between the Clinton sphere (Foundation, Podesta Group) and Russian entities. It references a 2012 Eric Holder memo regarding DOJ impartiality during election years to support the argument that the investigation violated standard protocol.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026480.jpg
This document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, argues against the legitimacy of the 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign. It contends that the investigation violated Justice Department norms regarding election-year impartiality and asserts there was no evidence of collusion when the probe began. The text contrasts the scrutiny of the Trump campaign with the activities of the Clinton campaign (funding the Steele dossier) and the Podesta Group's ties to Russian entities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026276.jpg
This document, a page from a House Oversight report, argues that the 'Crossfire' investigation into Trump-Russia collusion was a politically motivated counterintelligence probe lacking discernible evidence at its launch. It contrasts this with actions by the Clinton campaign and associated groups, such as funding the Steele Dossier and lobbying for Kremlin-tied entities, suggesting a double standard in how Russian connections were treated. The author posits that the case against Trump campaign associate George Papadopoulos was a form of entrapment and that no real evidence of collusion has emerged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026252.jpg
This document is a page from a U.S. House of Representatives oversight report detailing alleged misconduct by the FBI and DOJ regarding the Steele dossier. It claims officials concealed the dossier's unverified nature, the anti-Trump bias of its author, and related conflicts of interest from the FISC when obtaining a surveillance warrant. This document is related to the 2016 election investigation and contains no information about Jeffrey Epstein or related matters.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity