LDN

Location
Mentions
26
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
10
Also known as:
London (LDN) London (implied by LDN time zone) London (implied by LDN time)

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00023817.pdf

This document is an email chain from July 28 to August 3, 2020, between SDNY prosecutors (including an AUSA and Alison) and UK defense attorneys from Blackfords LLP (Gary Bloxsome, Jennifer Richardson). The correspondence negotiates the terms of a voluntary interview for a Blackfords client (unnamed in text, but contextually relevant to Prince Andrew) in connection with 'US v Maxwell'. Key topics include protections against evidence use outside the Maxwell case, immunity comparable to MLAT proceedings, elements of 18 U.S.C. 1001 (False Statements), and the extension of a 'Negotiation Period' to August 10, 2020.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00023804.pdf

This document is a chain of email correspondence between the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) and Gary Bloxsome, the lawyer representing Prince Andrew, spanning January to February 2020. The DOJ explicitly requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. While Bloxsome claims the Prince desires to cooperate, tensions escalate when U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly states that Prince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation,' leading Bloxsome to accuse the DOJ of breaching confidentiality agreements.

Email correspondence / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00023782.pdf

Email from an SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney to Gary Bloxsome (lawyer, likely for Prince Andrew based on context of 2020 Epstein/Maxwell investigation and MLAT/London references) regarding 'Sensitive Correspondence.' The email provides a blank proffer agreement, outlines the legal elements of making false statements under 18 U.S.C. ยง 1001, and discusses protections under the MLAT process for a potential voluntary interview. It also confirms a negotiation period extension until August 10, 2020.

Email
2025-12-25

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030393.jpg

This document is an email thread from May 10, 2017, showing Barclays executive Jes Staley being deceived by a prankster impersonating his colleague, John McFarlane. The prankster sends supportive messages about quelling "fires/thorns" and includes a bizarre poem, to which Staley responds. The document, marked "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT," indicates it was collected as evidence in a formal investigation, likely related to the public controversies Staley was facing at the time.

Email thread
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030392.jpg

This document displays a May 10, 2017 email exchange where Barclays CEO Jes Staley was duped by an email prankster impersonating Barclays Chairman John McFarlane. Staley sends a heartfelt thank you for support against a 'rally for [his] head,' praising the prankster's 'guile.' The prankster's replies, from a fake Gmail account, adopt a conspiratorial tone, asking 'who should we seek to silence next!?'

Email exchange
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030362.jpg

This document is an email chain from May 10, 2017, showing a conversation between Barclays CEO Jes Staley and an email prankster impersonating Barclays Chairman John McFarlane. The prankster offers Staley words of support and shares a cryptic poem, to which Staley responds, apparently believing the communication is genuine. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030362', highlights an incident that raised questions about Staley's judgment, which was relevant in the broader context of investigations into his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030360.jpg

This document is a news report detailing an incident on May 10, 2017, where Barclays CEO Jes Staley was duped by an email prankster impersonating Barclays' chairman, John McFarlane. Staley sent effusive praise in response, believing he was communicating with his chairman, shortly after Staley had been criticized for trying to unmask a whistleblower. The exchange, which was verified by the Financial Times, ended with the prankster sending a poem that spelled out the word 'Whistleblower'.

News article / report
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030355.jpg

This document is an email chain from May 10, 2017, showing Barclays CEO Jes Staley being deceived by an email prankster impersonating Barclays Chairman John McFarlane. The prankster sends bizarre supportive messages and a poem, referencing the professional pressures ('fires/thorns') Staley was under, to which Staley replies, seemingly believing the messages are genuine. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030355' indicates this was likely an exhibit in a congressional investigation related to Staley's conduct, which included his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030354.jpg

This document, from a House Oversight collection, displays two separate email communications from May 10, 2017, involving Barclays' then-CEO Jes Staley. The first is a legitimate exchange where Staley thanks Chairman John McFarlane for his support; the second is a noted 'Prankster's email' sent to Staley by an impersonator of McFarlane, containing provocative language like 'who should we seek to silence next!?'

Composite email exhibit / house oversight document
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030353.jpg

This document is a news article, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, detailing an email prank on then-Barclays CEO Jes Staley on May 10, 2017. An imposter posing as Chairman John McFarlane drew effusive praise from Staley, who was under fire for trying to unmask a whistleblower. The prankster revealed the deception with an acrostic poem spelling 'Whistleblower', highlighting Staley's poor judgment, a relevant theme given investigations into his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

News article / government exhibit
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity