Mark T. Luttier

Person
Mentions
10
Relationships
3
Events
2
Documents
5

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
3 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jessica Cadwell
Affiant notary
1
1
View
person Jessica Cadwell
Known to notary
1
1
View
person defendant
Client
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2009-09-17 N/A Deposition scheduled but canceled due to an incident involving Jeffrey Epstein and the plaintiff. Florida Science Foundation ... View
2009-09-17 N/A Notarization of an Affidavit executed by Mark T. Luttier. Jessica Cadwell, Notary Public, certifi... Palm Beach County, Florida View

Jeffrey Epstein Part 22 of 22.pdf

This document contains court filings from September 2009 regarding a dispute over the deposition of 'Jane Doe No. 4' in the civil case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's attorney, Adam Horowitz, cancelled the deposition after an alleged intimidation incident where Epstein and his driver, Igor Zinoviev, crossed paths with the plaintiff in the building lobby. Epstein's legal team (Critton and Luttier) filed for sanctions, arguing the encounter was coincidental as Epstein was leaving his office (Florida Science Foundation, same building) to avoid the deposition. The document includes affidavits from Epstein and Zinoviev denying interaction, invoices for the cancelled deposition costs, and a 2008 plea conference transcript defining 'no contact' orders.

Legal court filings (motions, affidavits, transcripts, orders)
2025-12-26

016-12.pdf

This document is a Motion for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 4 against Jeffrey Epstein for violating a no-contact order and a written stipulation. On September 16, 2009, Epstein appeared in the lobby of the building where Jane Doe No. 4's deposition was scheduled, staring her down and causing her to flee in distress, despite an agreement that he would not attend. The document includes a declaration from attorney Adam Horowitz, a transcript of the cancelled deposition where defense counsel Robert Critton argues Epstein was simply leaving his office in the same building, and an email confirming the prior stipulation.

Legal motion for sanctions and protective order (includes declaration, deposition transcript, and email)
2025-12-26

DOJ-OGR-00030305.tif

This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on September 17, 2009, detailing the cancellation of a deposition involving Jeffrey Epstein. The deposition was called off because Jeffrey Epstein made face-to-face contact with the plaintiff, Jane Doe 4, which her counsel, Adam Horowitz, stated intimidated her and violated a prior stipulation that Epstein would not be present. Defense counsel, Robert Critton, argued that Epstein was instructed to leave the building and planned to appear via Skype, and that the encounter would not have happened if the plaintiff and her counsel had arrived on time.

Court transcript / hearing record
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030303.tif

This document is the second page of a court filing related to 'Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein'. It contains a notarization statement by Jessica Cadwell, a Notary Public for the State of Florida, certifying that Mark T. Luttier appeared before her on September 17, 2009, to acknowledge an Affidavit. The document indicates that Mark T. Luttier was personally known to the notary.

Court document / notarization
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030281.tif

This document is a legal letter dated August 27, 2009, from Robert D. Critton, Jr. of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP to Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. of Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. It concerns the case Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, informing Mermelstein that Mr. Epstein intends to be present at his client's deposition as a party-defendant, but will not engage in conversation with Mermelstein's client.

Legal letter/correspondence
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity