Dianne Feinstein
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jon Kyl
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Senate Judiciary Committee
|
Member top democrat |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
|
Ranking democrat |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act)
|
Legislative sponsor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Adversarial political |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ted Mitchell
|
Advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jon Kyl
|
Legislative co sponsors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Senate Judiciary Committee
|
Member |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-24 | N/A | An agreement was reached for Christine Blasey Ford's testimony, and a second accusation of miscon... | N/A | View |
| 2018-09-24 | N/A | An agreement was reached for Christine Blasey Ford to testify. Shortly after, a second accusation... | N/A | View |
| 2013-06-01 | N/A | Senator Dianne Feinstein asserted that the program Snowden compromised had helped avert the 2009 ... | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Senator Feinstein asserts intelligence programs averted the 2009 subway attack. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Briefing regarding NSA programs (implied context). | Unknown | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Statements by Senators Kyl and Feinstein in the Congressional Record. | US Congress | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Senate floor colloquy regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). | US Senate | View |
| 2004-04-01 | N/A | Victims advocates met with Senators Kyl and Feinstein to decide strategy. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Congressional Record statement by Sen. Dianne Feinstein regarding the CVRA | Congress | View |
| 2003-01-07 | N/A | Senators Kyl and Feinstein proposed amendment as Senate Joint Resolution 1. | U.S. Senate | View |
| 2002-04-15 | N/A | Senators Kyl and Feinstein introduced the amendment. | U.S. Senate | View |
| 1997-01-21 | N/A | Reintroduction of the amendment in the 105th Congress. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 1996-04-22 | N/A | Senators Kyl and Feinstein introduced a federal victims' rights amendment. | Washington D.C. | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019791.jpg
This document is a proof page (Epilogue, page 303) from a book, stamped by the House Oversight Committee. The file name 'Epst_9780451494566' indicates this is likely from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, rather than a document about Jeffrey Epstein. The text analyzes the public distrust in government following Edward Snowden's NSA leaks, specifically discussing Senator Dianne Feinstein's defense of intelligence programs regarding a 2009 New York subway plot.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019783.jpg
This document appears to be page 295 from a book (likely by Edward Jay Epstein given the footer filename and ISBN) included in House Oversight records. It details Edward Snowden's revelations regarding NSA and GCHQ surveillance programs, specifically XKeyscore and PRISM, and includes reactions from officials like Dianne Feinstein and Mike Rogers. The text explains how XKeyscore creates digital fingerprints for suspects and recounts Snowden's advice on evading surveillance by avoiding UK routing and U.S. internet companies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019615.jpg
This document is page 127 from a book (identified by the ISBN in the footer as 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson) stamped with a House Oversight Committee identifier. The text discusses the polarized views on Edward Snowden, contrasting his supporters' 'whistle-blower' narrative with the views of intelligence officials (Morell, Alexander) and politicians (Feinstein, Rogers) who view him as a traitor or foreign agent. While the page content focuses entirely on the Snowden leaks, the document metadata (Epst_... filename and House Oversight stamp) indicates this page was included in materials reviewed during the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017749.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that victims should have access to presentence reports to meaningfully participate in sentencing hearings, citing statements by Senators Feinstein and Kyl. The document appears to be an exhibit submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely in the context of the investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case and the violation of victims' rights under the CVRA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017703.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen, which cites a 2007 Utah Law Review article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues for a broad interpretation of a victim's right to be heard in court proceedings, citing legislative history from Senators Feinstein and Kyl. It proposes a new rule (Rule 60(b)) regarding the enforcement of victims' rights and preserving claimed error.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017691.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article included in a House Oversight file associated with attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that legislative history and judicial precedent (specifically United States v. Kenna) guarantee victims the right to speak orally at sentencing, rather than just submitting written statements. It cites Senators Kyl and Feinstein extensively regarding the congressional intent behind the Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017649.jpg
This document is page 14 of a 78-page excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 1 and Rule 11) to align with the CVRA, quoting Senators Feinstein and Kyl on the Act's intent to reform the legal culture surrounding victims' rights. The document bears a footer for attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case (where the CVRA was a central legal issue).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017641.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article detailing the legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It describes the transition from seeking a constitutional amendment to passing a federal statute in 2004, highlighting the roles of Senators Kyl and Feinstein and President Bush. The document appears to be a file produced to the House Oversight Committee, bearing the name of attorney David Schoen, suggesting its relevance to legal arguments concerning victims' rights violations, likely in the context of the Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017640.jpg
This document is Page 5 of 78 from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article detailing the legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights amendment between 1996 and 1999. It outlines the efforts of Senators Kyl and Feinstein to pass a constitutional amendment ensuring rights for crime victims, noting failures in the 104th and 105th Congresses despite support from the Justice Department and President Clinton. The document bears the name of David Schoen (Epstein's attorney) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017619.jpg
This document is a page from a legal text (likely a law journal or brief submitted by David Schoen) analyzing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues against the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) narrow interpretation that victims' rights only attach after charges are filed, citing a 2011 letter from Senator Jon Kyl to Attorney General Eric Holder where Kyl clarifies that rights were intended to exist pre-indictment. The text criticizes the OLC for deceptively quoting legislative history to support their position.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017618.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology) submitted to the House Oversight Committee, likely by attorney David Schoen. It presents a legal argument criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) memorandum for interpreting the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) too narrowly, specifically arguing that victim rights should extend to the pre-charging phase. The text cites various statutes (VRRA) and case law to support the claim that victims have rights to protection and conference with the government before formal charges are filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017608.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or journal article submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the legislative history and intent of the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004 (CVRA), contrasting it with the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act. It highlights the Congressional goal to ensure victims are treated with fairness, dignity, and are active participants in the legal system, citing various Senators and legal precedents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024585.jpg
This document is a biography sheet for the 'KUE Advisory Board,' likely produced during a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024585). It details the professional backgrounds of three individuals: Les Biller (former Wells Fargo COO), Ted Mitchell (CEO of New Schools Venture Fund), and Tsvi Gal (CTO of Deutsche Bank Asset Management), listing their corporate affiliations, board memberships, and educational history.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014061.jpg
This page from a legal publication (likely by Paul Cassell) critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that the OLC deceptively quoted Senator Jon Kyl to suggest victim rights only apply after charging. The text cites a June 6, 2011 letter from Senator Kyl to Attorney General Eric Holder where Kyl clarifies that the CVRA was intended to provide rights to victims even before an indictment is filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014059.jpg
This document is page 80 of a legal analysis (likely by Paul Cassell) included in House Oversight materials (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014059). It critiques an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing against the OLC's position that victim rights only apply after formal charges are filed. The text outlines specific rights that logically apply pre-charging (protection, conferencing with government attorneys, and fairness/dignity) and cites case law (US v. Rubin) and legislative history to support a broader interpretation of the Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014046.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal review or academic paper (dated 2014) discussing the legislative intent behind Crime Victims' Rights, specifically the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It quotes Senators Jon Kyl and Dianne Feinstein regarding the need to prevent 'secondary harm' to victims and allow their participation in the justice system. The page concludes by introducing the Jeffrey Epstein case as a specific illustration of legal issues surrounding victims' rights during the pre-charging phase.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014045.jpg
This document is a page from a legal text or law review article (authored by 'Cassell et al.') included in House Oversight records. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), detailing the legislative intent to ensure victims are treated with fairness, dignity, and privacy, and to make them independent participants in the criminal justice process. The text cites U.S. Code and Congressional Records, specifically quoting Senators Feinstein and Kyl regarding the systemic neglect of victims prior to the Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014044.jpg
This document is page 65 of a 2014 law review article detailing the history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It explains that in April 2004, advocates shifted focus from a constitutional amendment to federal legislation due to the difficulty of obtaining a supermajority. The text discusses the limitations of the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act and cites various legal scholars and Senators (Kyl, Leahy, Feinstein) regarding the legislative history. This document appears in the House Oversight collection likely as background material regarding the legal framework relevant to the Epstein case's non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028384.jpg
This document is a raw data file for a New York Times news briefing dated September 24, 2018, not an Epstein-related document. The briefing reports on Christine Blasey Ford's agreement to testify against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and the emergence of a second accusation from Deborah Ramirez, which Kavanaugh denied. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028384' indicates it is an exhibit from a U.S. House Oversight Committee document production.
Intelligence Program Efficacy
Asserted that the program Snowden compromised helped avert carnage on NY subways in 2009.
CVRA Scope
Discussion regarding the scope of the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity