| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board published its final rule and response to public comments regar... | Federal Register, United St... | View |
This document contains the deposition transcript of 'Jane Doe' (a minor victim) dated February 20, 2008, and a Civil Complaint filed by her mother against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The deposition covers Jane Doe's family issues, credibility, drug use allegations, and interactions with law enforcement, while the Complaint details the 'scheme' wherein Robson recruited underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages. The document also includes procedural filings regarding service of process on Haley Robson.
This document is page 2 of a civil legal complaint detailing factual allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. It describes Epstein as a wealthy financier with a preference for minor girls and alleges a scheme involving Kellen and Haley Robson recruiting disadvantaged minors for sexual acts disguised as massages in Palm Beach, Florida, New York, and Little St. James. The document specifically mentions a victim, 'Jane Doe', who was 14 years old in 2005.
This page from a legal filing details the systematic recruitment of economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee, FL, by Ms. Robson for Jeffrey Epstein. It describes the procedure upon arrival at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, where victims were processed by assistant Sarah Kellen and led to a massage room before being subjected to sexual acts by Epstein. The document highlights that victims were targeted specifically because they were perceived as unlikely to complain to authorities.
This document is a Palm Beach Police Department incident report from April 20, 2006, detailing an interview with a witness named Robson. Robson describes being recruited at age 17 to give massages to Jeffrey Epstein, an encounter involving inappropriate touching, and Epstein's subsequent request for her to recruit younger girls for him. Robson admits to bringing six girls to Epstein, noting that he specifically rejected a 23-year-old for being 'too old' and preferred them 'the younger the better.'
This article details the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein initiated in March 2005 after a mother reported her 14-year-old daughter had been molested. It outlines the evidence gathered by Palm Beach police, including witness statements, surveillance, and a raid on Epstein's mansion that yielded photos and hidden cameras. The text also describes the aggressive defense strategy employed by Epstein's legal team, including private investigators and lawyers Roy Black and Alan Dershowitz, to undermine the credibility of the victims and witnesses.
A 2006 Palm Beach Post article detailing the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting conflicts between Police Chief Reiter and the State Attorney's office. The article describes evidence collection methods including trash pulls and airport surveillance, details the role of recruiter Haley Robson and assistant Sarah Kellen, and notes a returned $90,000 donation from Epstein to the police department. It also lists Epstein's high-profile connections to figures like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump.
A Palm Beach Police Department incident report detailing an interview with a witness regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The witness describes being recruited at age 17 to provide massages, sexual advances made by Epstein, and his solicitation for her to recruit younger girls for him. The report notes specific details about the encounters, payment, and the recruitment of other victims.
This article details the Palm Beach police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein initiated in March 2005 after a mother reported her 14-year-old daughter had been molested. It outlines police surveillance tactics, the recruitment role of Haley Robson, and the subsequent interference by Epstein's private investigators and legal team, including Roy Black and Alan Dershowitz. The document also highlights Epstein's lavish lifestyle, charitable donations to local police, and past associations with figures like Donald Trump and Michael Stroll.
This document contains the text of a New York Post article from September 2007 regarding the legal case against Jeffrey Epstein. It details allegations of soliciting minors, the involvement of key figures like Haley Robson and Sarah Kellen, police investigations, and statements from Epstein's legal team regarding a potential plea deal and police conduct.
This document contains text from news coverage regarding the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach. It details the controversial plea deal negotiated by his high-profile legal team, the dropping of federal investigations, and a 2006 New York Post article discussing his light charges compared to the evidence gathered by police.
This document is an FBI file copy of a March 18, 2008, Palm Beach Post article. It details a civil lawsuit filed in state court by a 17-year-old 'Jane Doe' against Jeffrey Epstein, his recruiter Haley Robson, and his assistant Sarah Kellen, alleging conspiracy, racketeering, and sexual assault stemming from incidents in 2005. The article notes that Robson admitted to police she acted 'like a Heidi Fleiss' and mentions Epstein's upcoming criminal trial for solicitation of prostitution.
A newspaper article details a lawsuit alleging that Jeffrey Epstein paid a minor $300 for sexual acts after she was recruited by Haley Robson. The article discusses the police investigation, Epstein's indictment on solicitation charges, and mentions other lawsuits and allegations regarding his properties in Palm Beach and the Virgin Islands.
This document consists of four handwritten phone message notes, all dated September 4, 2005, for Jeffrey Epstein (J.E.) and Ghislaine Maxwell (Ms. B. Maxwell). The messages, taken by staff members 'J' and 'L', include a notification for Maxwell about a woman arriving at 3:00, and a message for Epstein about a woman named Julie who canceled and wanted to speak about college. The document also contains two simple requests for Epstein to return calls.
This document, comprised of clippings from a September 20, 2007 New York Post article, details the state of the sex case against Jeffrey Epstein. It notes that a grand jury found witnesses not credible, leaving only a single solicitation charge, while police allege Epstein's assistant Sarah Kellen facilitated liaisons. Epstein's lawyers claim a police vendetta, cite a passed lie-detector test, and are reportedly negotiating a 15-month plea deal with federal prosecutors.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rule about employer notice-posting requirements. It clarifies that a 'knowing and willful' failure to post a notice can be evidence of unlawful anti-union motive and addresses public comments on the rule. Despite the query's framing, this document contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any associated activities; its content is exclusively about U.S. labor law.
This document from the Federal Register discusses the implications of an employer's failure to post required notices under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It addresses the tolling of the statute of limitations for filing unfair labor practice charges, particularly debating whether union-represented employees should be treated differently from non-union employees. The text also considers whether a failure to post can be used as evidence of an employer's unlawful antiunion motive.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, discussing a rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concerning the statute of limitations for unfair labor practice claims. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305' suggests it was cataloged as an exhibit for a congressional committee. The content of the document itself is purely about U.S. labor law and contains no information, names, or events related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing a final rule from the National Labor Relations Board. The rule establishes employer obligations for posting notices of employee rights, focusing on requirements for foreign language translations, accessibility for vision-impaired and illiterate employees, and electronic posting. Despite the user's prompt, this document's content is strictly related to U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) analysis and response to public comments on a proposed rule regarding employee rights. It discusses modifications to language about unlawful union conduct, collective bargaining duties, and NLRA coverage. Contrary to the user's prompt, this document is entirely about U.S. labor law and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) final rule on a notice of employee rights. The NLRB explains its decision to exclude 'Beck rights' and other union-specific rights from the notice, while including a detailed list of examples of unlawful employer conduct under the NLRA. The document also addresses comments received from various organizations like Baker & McKenzie during the rulemaking process.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) response to public comments on a proposed employee rights notice. The Board addresses and refutes or incorporates feedback from organizations like COLLE, ALFA, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce regarding the language on collective bargaining, the right to strike, and the right to refrain from union activity. The document has no connection to Jeffrey Epstein and is strictly related to U.S. labor law and regulatory procedure.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) final rule on a notice of employee rights. The text summarizes and responds to public comments from various groups on the language of the notice, particularly concerning the balance between the right to unionize and the right to refrain from union activity. Contrary to the prompt's implication, this document has no connection whatsoever to Jeffrey Epstein or any related matters; it is strictly a regulatory document concerning U.S. labor law.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing public comments on a proposed National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights. It outlines the divided feedback, with unions and employee advocates praising the notice for its clarity, while employer groups and conservative organizations criticized it as unbalanced, pro-union, and an oversimplification of complex labor law. The document has no connection to Jeffrey Epstein and is solely focused on U.S. labor regulations.
This article from The Palm Beach Post, dated July 26, 2006, details the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for alleged sexual activity with minors. It describes police surveillance, evidence collection from his trash, and witness statements from girls who were allegedly recruited and paid for massages. The piece also highlights the conflict between the Palm Beach Police Chief and the State Attorney over the case's prosecution and notes Epstein's high-profile connections and legal team.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity