Witnesses
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Witnesses, including Carolyn, testified at trial about the abuse they endured. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Criminal trial | Cosby's criminal trial where D.A. Castor's successors used Cosby's prior sworn inculpatory testim... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A thirteen-day trial was held where the Government presented extensive witness testimony and othe... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A trial where a victim witness testified against Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Jack Scarola talked to other witnesses. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding / hearing | A discussion during a court proceeding regarding a witness's inability to recall information, spe... | Courtroom (implied by 'side... | View |
| 2021-03-31 | Investigation | Government conducted additional investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4, including interviewi... | N/A | View |
| 1980-01-01 | Sexual assault | Alleged prior bad acts/sexual assaults by Cosby involving multiple victims, used as evidence of a... | hotel rooms or at the home ... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017663.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion during a cross-examination. Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger debate with the Court about the proper handling of a witness's (Jane Cross's) lack of recollection, specifically concerning whether Epstein directed her seating. The core issue revolves around refreshing a witness's memory versus allowing the jury to consider the witness's current inability to recall as relevant evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00004815.jpg
This legal document details the procedural history of a case involving Mr. Cosby, focusing on a District Attorney's initial decision to decline criminal prosecution in exchange for Cosby's testimony in a civil action. It explains how Cosby's subsequent incriminating statements were later used against him by the D.A.'s successors in a criminal trial, leading to an allowance of appeal regarding the enforceability of the original agreement. The document also provides background on Constad, the alleged victim, and his connection to Cosby through employment at Temple University.
DOJ-OGR-00002914.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 9, 2021, details the Government's investigative actions concerning "Minor Victim-4" and the "defendant." It outlines a series of interviews with Minor Victim-4, conducted via video and in-person between summer 2020 and January 2021, alongside further investigative steps. The document asserts that a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) was timely presented to a grand jury in late March, refuting the defense's claims of intentional delay or that the indictment acknowledges the strength of pretrial motions.
Additional investigation
The Government interviewed additional witnesses as part of an investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4.
Additional investigation
The Government interviewed additional witnesses as part of an investigation to corroborate Minor Victim-4.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity