| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jim Eisenberg
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker 'A'
|
Co conspirators coordinators |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Woman
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Caller/Victim
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED]
|
Professional supervisory |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A redacted individual accompanied the interviewee to the encounters 'twice'. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The process of arranging for girls to visit Jeffrey. When Jeffrey was in town, a redacted person ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The interviewee provided massages and was paid $200 each time. The client would sometimes masturb... | An unspecified location ref... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A briefing conversation where a redacted female associate of Epstein's advised the interviewee ab... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with a redacted individual. The interview was held pursuant to a ... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted by the FBI with an individual represented by counsel, pursuant to... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with an individual (name redacted) by the FBI and an Assistant U.... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 22 items of property as evidence in the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 19 items of property/evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 24 categories of property/evidence by law enforcement. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of property/evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
This document is an internal email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated January 8, 2020. It summarizes findings from newly received flight records, noting that Donald Trump flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet significantly more often than previously reported—specifically at least eight times between 1993 and 1996. The email highlights that Ghislaine Maxwell was present on at least four of these flights and identifies other passengers including Trump's family members and potential witnesses in the Maxwell case.
This document is an electronic calendar record showing that an individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) accepted a meeting titled 'Epstein Meeting' scheduled for January 6, 2020. The meeting took place several months after Jeffrey Epstein's death, indicating it was likely related to the ongoing investigation or legal proceedings.
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Jeff Jocks, counsel for Interlochen Center for the Arts, spanning February to November 2020. SDNY issued a subpoena seeking records of any tuition payments made by Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell for students at Interlochen. On October 30, 2020, Jeff Jocks confirmed that Interlochen retains tuition records for only seven years and that a search of their files revealed no payments by Epstein or his entities.
This document is a printout of an electronic calendar entry for a scheduled call on March 19, 2021. The subject of the call is 'Epstein FOIA' (Freedom of Information Act). The identities of the organizer and attendees are redacted, as is the location.
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Miami attorney Joe Nascimento and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) spanning July 2019 to May 2021. The correspondence begins when Nascimento's client is served a grand jury subpoena regarding the Epstein case on July 6, 2019. The emails detail the scheduling of various meetings in West Palm Beach and video conferences to discuss the client's cooperation and proffer agreements, continuing through the period of Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest in July 2020.
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Jeff Jocks, attorney for Interlochen Center for the Arts, and an Assistant United States Attorney from the SDNY, spanning from February 2020 to May 2021. The SDNY issued a subpoena for records regarding tuition payments made by Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell for students at Interlochen. Jeff Jocks confirmed that Interlochen retains tuition records for only seven years and that a search of their files yielded no records of payments by Epstein or his entities.
Palm Beach Police Department incident report (Case 1-05-000368) detailing the execution of a search warrant on October 20, 2005, at Jeffrey Epstein's residence. Officers searched multiple rooms, seizing framed photographs of 'various women' and Epstein, as well as DVDs and VCR tapes. The report also details the search of two vehicles registered to Epstein (a Chevy Suburban and a Cadillac Escalade), finding a car rental agreement and a handwritten note regarding cash for gas in the Suburban.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven key issues, including over 109,000 emails missing attachments, metadata discrepancies on files extracted from Epstein's devices, and difficulties providing discovery materials to Maxwell at the MDC due to technical and bureaucratic limitations. The prosecution responds with technical explanations regarding FBI CART processes, 'carved' or deleted files lacking metadata, and the conversion of VHS/cassette tapes.
This document is an email chain from May 21, 2021, discussing a draft letter concerning a deferred prosecution agreement for two guards involved in the Epstein case, who were charged with falsifying records. The U.S. Attorney's Office is seeking confirmation from DOJ-OIG regarding how to represent the ongoing OIG investigation and potential public report in the letter. The emails show communication between the U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, and an individual potentially from the OIG, regarding the sensitive nature of the report and interviews with the guards.
This document is a heavily redacted email dated May 21, 2021. It involves the transmission of a legal document titled 'Government_Opposition_to_Defense_Supplemental_Pretrial_Motions_v5_(MC).docx', indicating it is internal correspondence likely regarding the preparation of court filings, possibly for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the date and context of such document releases.
An email dated June 19, 2020, from a Legal Assistant/Criminal Clerk at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to redacted recipients. The email transmits stamped and signed Non-Disclosure Orders (NDOs) and Pen Register (PEN) documents that had been submitted to the Magistrate Court, specifically referencing an AT&T attachment.
This document is an email chain between an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and a colleague regarding a 'prosecution memo' related to 'JE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein). The correspondence, dated August 8, 2019 (two days before Epstein's death), involves a request for the final version of the memo, which is attached with a filename dated June 17, 2019.
This document is an email from July 27, 2019, notifying the recipient that a final travel voucher for Trip ID 10416822-1 has been approved and is awaiting further approval. The purpose of the trip, from July 11-12, 2019, was for victim interviews in West Palm Beach, FL, related to the U.S. v. Epstein case (2018R01618), with total expenses of $779.97 and an estimated cost of $1050.66.
This document is an email thread from January 2020 between Stan Pottinger and a redacted individual. Pottinger shares a CNN article about Jeffrey Epstein's environmental violations in the Virgin Islands. The recipient replies with a sarcastic remark, noting Epstein as a 'world-historically appalling . . . polluter,' seemingly downplaying the environmental charges in light of his other crimes.
This document is a digital calendar entry for October 23, 2020, scheduling a call with the SDNY (Southern District of New York) regarding 'discovery, Epstein investigation.' The organizer and attendees are redacted, as is the specific location and reminder content. The entry is marked as 'X-PERSONAL' priority 5.
This document is an email dated January 24, 2020, sent by a redacted Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email transmits an attachment titled 'Questionnaire_for_Official_Foreign_Travel,_Stockholm,_2020', suggesting preparation for official government travel to Sweden.
This document is an internal email chain from June 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and their Victim Witness Coordinator regarding the impending arrest of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence reveals that the investigation was covert at the time, with charges expected within a week, and highlights a strong desire to avoid the failures of the previous Southern District of Florida investigation regarding victims' rights. Logistics for a victim hotline (866-874-8900) and coordination between SDNY, the FBI, and the C-20 squad are discussed in detail.
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2019, between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Virgin Islands (USVI). They are coordinating the logistics for a search warrant application for Jeffrey Epstein's property on Great St. James island. The emails reveal that the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service had recently conducted surveillance (flyover) of the island and could assist, and that the New York Times had contacted USA Gretchen Shappert and was sending a reporter to the region.
This document is an email chain from July 25, 2019, between an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). The correspondence concerns the transfer of 'staff memos and photos' related to an investigation into an incident involving Jeffrey Epstein that occurred 'earlier this week' (referencing his suicide attempt). The emails establish that a written request via email was sufficient for the BOP to release the documents without a subpoena, and discuss coordination with Main Justice.
This document is an email chain from July 23-24, 2019, between defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and an Assistant United States Attorney for the SDNY regarding a Protective Order for the Jeffrey Epstein case (indicated by attachment name '_JE_'). Weinberg outlines several objections to the government's draft, specifically concerning the handling of discovery materials at the MCC (where the defendant is held), the redaction of witness identities, and the labeling of FBI 302 reports. The chain concludes with the AUSA sending a revised order incorporating some edits for signature.
This document is an email chain between the NYPD Sex Offender Monitoring Unit (Lt. Craig) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding Jeffrey Epstein shortly after his July 2019 arrest. The SDNY attorney inquires if the discovery of underage nude photos at Epstein's residence affects his sex offender status and requests a 2011 risk assessment file for an upcoming bail hearing. The NYPD Lieutenant clarifies that the photos do not alter his registration status and notes that the physical files are currently with a vendor for digitization.
This document is an email dated July 7, 2019, sent by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email provides contact information (office, cell, email) for Martin Weinberg, identifying him as an 'Epstein defense attorney'. The timing coincides with the days immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between Miami attorney Joe Nascimento and Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the SDNY regarding the Epstein case. Nascimento informs the SDNY that a former client of his deceased partner, Alan Ross, was served with a grand jury subpoena by a federal agent on July 6, 2019. The group coordinates a time to speak on Tuesday, July 9, with one email mentioning the need to brief 'Florida approach agents' before they fly out that afternoon.
This document is an email chain involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) requesting administrative approval for travel related to the investigation 'United States v. Epstein' (Case 2018R01618). The emails span from March to July 2019 and detail multiple trips to Florida (Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale) and one trip to Los Angeles for the purpose of conducting victim interviews and meetings. The correspondence highlights the active preparation of the prosecution team leading up to Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | College/Writer | $0.00 | Potential payment for college tuition. | View |
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | Writer | $0.00 | Purchase of a travel ticket ('bought me a ticke... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED WITNESS] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Witness stated he would like to reimburse [reda... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein o... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $100.00 | Payment for going with her to Jeff's house and ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | The text mentions 'offering [REDACTED]', implyi... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein paid for her to [redacted]. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein's organiz... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Christmas gift via Western Union | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (low end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (high end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Cash payments given after massages, initially f... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Subject stated they 'was paid well and they bot... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (range start) | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (range end, depending on travel... | View |
| N/A | Received | Baby's father / O... | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Alleged payment mentioned in school rumors for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein provided [Redacted] to travel to Epstei... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Received monies for the same thing (amount unsp... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment after the massage incident | View |
Was just about to email you actually. Can we call you after 5?
Yep, thanks very much.
Notification of a file upload from FBINET to UNET. Attachment: Case_Evidence_Report-20210315-1809_-_NY.xlsx
Automated read receipt notification.
Read receipt notification.
Read receipt notification.
This appears to be an automated read receipt confirming that a message with the subject 'Question re Epstein Relativity' was read.
Automated read receipt indicating a message was opened.
FBI team was out of office, will answer questions next week. Client can review confidential images at 500 Pearl Street on 5/18. Unsure if all questions about images can be answered or if evidence vault can be visited.
I am not in today (and [REDACTED] is still out) but the full team should be back in on Monday to get working on this task list. We will get you answers to these questions as soon as we know.
Thanks very much,
Requesting a list of all Jeffrey Epstein-related FOIA lawsuits handled by the Civil Division for a criminal discovery matter.
Stating they are copying the person handling the main matter before Judge Engelmayer and will ask the civil clerk.
Automatic out-of-office reply stating the sender will be away from March 12 to March 15, 2021. Directs questions to two redacted colleagues.
Stating they are copying the person handling the main matter before Judge Engelmayer who would know about related FOIAs, and will ask the civil clerk.
Initial request: Seeking a list of all Jeffrey Epstein-related FOIA lawsuits handled by the Civil Division for a criminal discovery matter.
Following up on this, we had a call with defense counsel, who asked a number of questions I couldn't answer. Would you please let me know the answers to the below? For the nude/partially nude highly confidential images: • How many highly confidential images are there in total, including both from the discs and from the devices? • What is the format of these images? Are they all going to be viewable as thumbnails on the computer, or does each image have to be opened individually? • For the images extracted from iPhone and iPads, will the FBI please be sure to include Celebrite so the defense can open those files? • What, if any, metadata will be included with the highly confidential files? Will the metadata include information clarifying which device each image was extracted from? • Would it be possible to provide the defense with more than one laptop to review these images on? They will have their whole team of lawyers, the defendant, and investigators reviewing these, so they asked if it would be possible to have multiple laptops instead of all crowding around one. For the physical evidence: • Does the FBI have a list of all physical items in its custody for this case? The defense is eager to have such a list and does not seem to care if it is in the same excel spreadsheet format we previously provided. (My recollection from other cases is that the FBI can usually generate a list of all 1B items, so if that's possible, we'd be grateful for that). • How soon can defense counsel go to the vault to see the physical evidence? Would they be able to do so on Friday of next week? • If the defense wants to review the contents of VHS tapes, cassette tapes, and CDs, would the FBI be able to provide a space with the appropriate players for them to view the contents of that media?
Email header only. Subject indicates a discussion regarding an Epstein Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
Meeting acceptance notification for a call regarding Epstein FOIA.
Notification that a call regarding Epstein FOIA has been accepted.
Reporting another call from Ms. [Redacted] looking for a follow-up.
Requesting a list of every FOIA request the office has received relating to Epstein or Maxwell, outcome of requests, and AUSA points of contact.
Providing FOIA tracking database info regarding Epstein FOIAs and an attached letter regarding discovery vs FOIA.
Asking to check records for missing cases, specifically mentioning a civil case involving a FOIA request from Radar Online.
Explaining that the FOIA Tracking Database only covers requests directed to their Office, not requests to other components (e.g., FBI) that end up in litigation in SDNY.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity