[REDACTED]
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jim Eisenberg
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker 'A'
|
Co conspirators coordinators |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Woman
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Caller/Victim
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED]
|
Professional supervisory |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A redacted individual accompanied the interviewee to the encounters 'twice'. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The process of arranging for girls to visit Jeffrey. When Jeffrey was in town, a redacted person ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The interviewee provided massages and was paid $200 each time. The client would sometimes masturb... | An unspecified location ref... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A briefing conversation where a redacted female associate of Epstein's advised the interviewee ab... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with a redacted individual. The interview was held pursuant to a ... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted by the FBI with an individual represented by counsel, pursuant to... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with an individual (name redacted) by the FBI and an Assistant U.... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 22 items of property as evidence in the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 19 items of property/evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 24 categories of property/evidence by law enforcement. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of property/evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025452.jpg
This document is a digital forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from May 9, 2019, between 'jee' (jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The redacted sender shares a NY Post article link about Jeffrey Epstein allegedly building an illegal compound in the Virgin Islands. 'Jee' responds by questioning the article's claims ('Underwater office ?') and calling the authors 'nuts,' then shifts the topic to a TV episode involving the FBI and someone named Bain.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025450.jpg
This document is a digital forensic log of text messages exchanged between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual on March 30-31, 2019. The conversation discusses Epstein's birthday plans, with Epstein noting he is hosting a dinner for 25 friends. The other participant updates Epstein on their location in North Salem with individuals named Jordan, Maya, and Clay.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025449.jpg
This document is a digital communication log from March 30, 2019, showing a text exchange between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The redacted individual expresses excitement ('Will have so much fun'), and Epstein asks about a person in a picture, subsequently identifying them as 'Jacques Lang' (likely French politician Jack Lang). The redacted sender then jokingly asks 'Or do you mean me'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025446.jpg
This document is a message log from March 2019 containing a conversation between a redacted sender and 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an account historically associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation involves sharing a photo (prompting the comment 'So young!! No sweatpants!') and discussing a real estate listing for a house, with the 'jeeitunes' account stating plans to visit and recalling the property. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025445.jpg
This document contains a log of electronic messages from March 18-19, 2019, extracted for a House Oversight investigation. The communications are between `jeeitunes@gmail.com` (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The messages discuss logistical plans to 'deposit money' and include a remark from the `jeeitunes` account about using a 'new disguise to avoid paparazzi'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025444.jpg
This document is a log of digital messages exchanged on March 18, 2019, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' and a redacted individual. The conversation revolves around personal finance, specifically the student's hesitation to get a credit card while not earning money, and the redacted individual advising them to apply for a Visa credit card, noting that being in medical school would help the application. The document originates from House Oversight Committee records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025443.jpg
This document contains a log of electronic messages from March 18, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. They discuss the 'college scandal' (Varsity Blues), noting that 'everyone hates the rich.' The redacted sender proposes a birthday gift of $30,000 in Amex gift cards or a credit card setup to allow money to be wired directly, explicitly emphasizing the goal of ensuring 'total privacy' so 'no one gets to review what you do with it.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025442.jpg
This document is a digital extraction of a text message conversation dated March 18, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses the political climate, specifically mentioning Donald Trump, the Mueller report, the Harvey Weinstein trial, and Democratic debates, with both parties agreeing that public controversies tend to 'blow over' and people 'move on.' The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025442).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025439.jpg
This document is a digital communication log from March 2019 between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias e:jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The redacted individual sends Epstein a Daily Beast article about Epstein funding entrepreneur Lana Pozhidaeva. Epstein responds six days later, dismissing the public interest as 'crazy' and suggesting people should focus on 'important things like science'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025438.jpg
This document captures a digital message exchange from March 12, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation revolves around Epstein's reaction to hearing his name mentioned at a White House press conference, with Epstein stating 'the truth will come out.' The redacted correspondent replies sympathetically, dismissing the allegations as 'wild stories' and making a veiled reference to the current US President.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025436.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction of an SMS log from February 2019 between 'jee' (associated with jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation includes an inquiry about landing, an invitation to watch the Oscars which 'jee' declines, and a notification regarding the death of Catherine Shimony's mother. The document originates from House Oversight Committee records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025435.jpg
This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on February 27, 2019. It captures a conversation between a redacted sender and a recipient discussing a 'rabid republican defense,' likely in reference to political hearings occurring on that date. The document includes technical metadata such as GUIDs, read receipts, and timestamps, and bears a House Oversight Committee bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025434.jpg
This document is a log of digital messages exchanged on February 27, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation touches on business matters regarding asset ownership percentages and operating properties, followed by a query about the redacted individual's 'takeaways' and whether an event was 'fun,' to which the respondent replied 'No'. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025433.jpg
This document contains a log of digital messages from February 27, 2019, primarily sent by 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known Jeffrey Epstein alias). The messages discuss office logistics involving 'Rona' (likely Rona Graff) and 'Rodger', and provide commentary on a 'Financial statement exhibit,' which the sender characterizes as 'Wild' and 'misleading,' specifically noting 'tricks' regarding asset values and loans. One message sender is redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025431.jpg
This document is a digital communication log from February 27, 2019, containing a text exchange between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an email alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation appears to reference the Michael Cohen testimony occurring on that date, specifically mentioning the 'Trump Org' and 'henchmen.' The user 'jeeitunes' states they are 'waiting my turn' and tells the other party to go to 'other mtgs' because it will take 'hours.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025430.jpg
This document is a log of digital messages exchanged on February 27, 2019, between an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein ('jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation is casual, with Epstein asking 'Are you chewing,' to which the redacted individual replies explaining it is a 'bad habit from middle school' of chewing the interior of their mouth. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025430', indicating it is part of evidence gathered by the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025429.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from February 27, 2019, between 'jee' (using the ID jeeitunes@gmail.com, likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation begins with a discussion about an unnamed male's grades and the 'privilege' regarding the non-release of college transcripts. Later in the morning, 'jee' sends two messages complimenting the redacted individual's outfit and appearance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025425.jpg
This document contains a log of electronic messages from February 25, 2019, produced for the House Oversight Committee. The messages discuss Donald Trump's media strategy and comment negatively on 'The Australian Cardinal' (likely George Pell, whose conviction became public around this date). The sender of the messages is redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025424.jpg
This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on February 25, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias often associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation covers personal topics, including the redacted sender's recent trip to Anguilla with their children, and comments on current events involving Michael Cohen's testimony and the summit between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025421.jpg
This document is a forensic log of text messages exchanged between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual in February 2019. The conversation touches on political commentary regarding America's priorities and coordinates a breakfast meeting involving an individual named 'Weingarten' for the upcoming Saturday. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025419.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction of a message thread from February 12, 2019, stamped by the House Oversight Committee. The conversation is between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an email alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted sender, discussing the whereabouts of 'Pompeo' (likely Mike Pompeo) and 'Miro' in Slovakia. The tone is casual, with 'jeeitunes' remarking 'How unusual:)' and 'Very cool' regarding the meeting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025418.jpg
This document is a forensic extraction log of text messages from February 10-11, 2019, labelled with the footer HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025418. The conversation takes place between a redacted individual and 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The exchange includes the redacted sender stating 'I'm wasted' and '3 hours dude@ 90', followed the next morning by 'jeeitunes' confirming they will be in New York for several days and asking about the other person's plans.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025416.jpg
This document is a message log from February 10, 2019, sourced from House Oversight Committee records. It details a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual regarding a meeting with an unnamed third party ('He'). The conversation touches on political topics, specifically tax cuts, healthcare, and 'bolsonari' (likely Jair Bolsonaro) threats to workers, concluding with the redacted sender describing the third party as a 'Great gentleman'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025414.jpg
This document contains a log of messages from February 9, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes') and a redacted individual. The redacted individual, currently in Tucson, requests a meeting with Noam Chomsky. Epstein confirms Chomsky is willing to meet and provides briefing advice, warning the individual to be gentle regarding discussion of Bolsonaro because Chomsky's wife is Brazilian and they are friends with Lula. Epstein offers to connect them via email.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025412.jpg
This document contains a log of digital messages from February 6-7, 2019, between a redacted individual and 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation revolves around reacting to renewed federal scrutiny and media coverage, specifically links from ZeroHedge and Fox News regarding DOJ and Senate inquiries into Epstein's 2008 plea deal. Epstein appears to be strategizing on whether to ignore the press, attack, or have his 'attunes' (likely a typo for attorneys) write an op-ed expressing indignation.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | College/Writer | $0.00 | Potential payment for college tuition. | View |
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | Writer | $0.00 | Purchase of a travel ticket ('bought me a ticke... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED WITNESS] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Witness stated he would like to reimburse [reda... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein o... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $100.00 | Payment for going with her to Jeff's house and ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | The text mentions 'offering [REDACTED]', implyi... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein paid for her to [redacted]. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein's organiz... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Christmas gift via Western Union | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (low end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (high end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Cash payments given after massages, initially f... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Subject stated they 'was paid well and they bot... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (range start) | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (range end, depending on travel... | View |
| N/A | Received | Baby's father / O... | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Alleged payment mentioned in school rumors for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein provided [Redacted] to travel to Epstei... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Received monies for the same thing (amount unsp... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment after the massage incident | View |
Re: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Was just about to email you actually. Can we call you after 5?
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Yep, thanks very much.
FBINET to UNET Uploaded Files
Notification of a file upload from FBINET to UNET. Attachment: Case_Evidence_Report-20210315-1809_-_NY.xlsx
Read: Question re Epstein Relativity
Automated read receipt notification.
Read: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity
Read receipt notification.
Read: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity
Read receipt notification.
Read: Question re Epstein Relativity
This appears to be an automated read receipt confirming that a message with the subject 'Question re Epstein Relativity' was read.
Read: Question re Epstein Relativity
Automated read receipt indicating a message was opened.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
FBI team was out of office, will answer questions next week. Client can review confidential images at 500 Pearl Street on 5/18. Unsure if all questions about images can be answered or if evidence vault can be visited.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
I am not in today (and [REDACTED] is still out) but the full team should be back in on Monday to get working on this task list. We will get you answers to these questions as soon as we know.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Thanks very much,
Initial Inquiry
Requesting a list of all Jeffrey Epstein-related FOIA lawsuits handled by the Civil Division for a criminal discovery matter.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein/FOIA matters
Stating they are copying the person handling the main matter before Judge Engelmayer and will ask the civil clerk.
Automatic reply: Question re Epstein Relativity
Automatic out-of-office reply stating the sender will be away from March 12 to March 15, 2021. Directs questions to two redacted colleagues.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein/FOIA matters
Stating they are copying the person handling the main matter before Judge Engelmayer who would know about related FOIAs, and will ask the civil clerk.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein/FOIA matters
Initial request: Seeking a list of all Jeffrey Epstein-related FOIA lawsuits handled by the Civil Division for a criminal discovery matter.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Following up on this, we had a call with defense counsel, who asked a number of questions I couldn't answer. Would you please let me know the answers to the below? For the nude/partially nude highly confidential images: • How many highly confidential images are there in total, including both from the discs and from the devices? • What is the format of these images? Are they all going to be viewable as thumbnails on the computer, or does each image have to be opened individually? • For the images extracted from iPhone and iPads, will the FBI please be sure to include Celebrite so the defense can open those files? • What, if any, metadata will be included with the highly confidential files? Will the metadata include information clarifying which device each image was extracted from? • Would it be possible to provide the defense with more than one laptop to review these images on? They will have their whole team of lawyers, the defendant, and investigators reviewing these, so they asked if it would be possible to have multiple laptops instead of all crowding around one. For the physical evidence: • Does the FBI have a list of all physical items in its custody for this case? The defense is eager to have such a list and does not seem to care if it is in the same excel spreadsheet format we previously provided. (My recollection from other cases is that the FBI can usually generate a list of all 1B items, so if that's possible, we'd be grateful for that). • How soon can defense counsel go to the vault to see the physical evidence? Would they be able to do so on Friday of next week? • If the defense wants to review the contents of VHS tapes, cassette tapes, and CDs, would the FBI be able to provide a space with the appropriate players for them to view the contents of that media?
Call re: Epstein FOIA
Email header only. Subject indicates a discussion regarding an Epstein Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
Accepted: Call re: Epstein FOIA
Meeting acceptance notification for a call regarding Epstein FOIA.
Accepted: Call re: Epstein FOIA
Notification that a call regarding Epstein FOIA has been accepted.
Re: Epstein victim call
Reporting another call from Ms. [Redacted] looking for a follow-up.
Jeffrey Epstein/Ghislaine Maxwell/FOIA
Requesting a list of every FOIA request the office has received relating to Epstein or Maxwell, outcome of requests, and AUSA points of contact.
RE: Jeffrey Epstein/Ghislaine Maxwell/FOIA
Providing FOIA tracking database info regarding Epstein FOIAs and an attached letter regarding discovery vs FOIA.
RE: Jeffrey Epstein/Ghislaine Maxwell/FOIA
Asking to check records for missing cases, specifically mentioning a civil case involving a FOIA request from Radar Online.
RE: Jeffrey Epstein/Ghislaine Maxwell/FOIA
Explaining that the FOIA Tracking Database only covers requests directed to their Office, not requests to other components (e.g., FBI) that end up in litigation in SDNY.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity