| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jim Eisenberg
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker 'A'
|
Co conspirators coordinators |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Woman
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Caller/Victim
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED]
|
Professional supervisory |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A redacted individual accompanied the interviewee to the encounters 'twice'. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The process of arranging for girls to visit Jeffrey. When Jeffrey was in town, a redacted person ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The interviewee provided massages and was paid $200 each time. The client would sometimes masturb... | An unspecified location ref... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A briefing conversation where a redacted female associate of Epstein's advised the interviewee ab... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with a redacted individual. The interview was held pursuant to a ... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted by the FBI with an individual represented by counsel, pursuant to... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with an individual (name redacted) by the FBI and an Assistant U.... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 22 items of property as evidence in the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 19 items of property/evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 24 categories of property/evidence by law enforcement. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of property/evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
This document contains a collection of FBI administrative records from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation (Case 31E-MM-108062) dating from late 2006. It includes a 'Deleted Page Information Sheet' indicating over 500 pages of withheld material. The visible content consists of subpoenas sent to telecommunications providers (MetroPCS, Sprint/Nextel) and JetBlue Airways, along with evidence receipt forms (FD-340) and fax cover sheets confirming the transmission of toll records and subscriber information. MetroPCS notably declared that some requested call records had been purged in accordance with their 6-month retention policy.
A Palm Beach Police Department incident report detailing allegations of aggressive stalking by private investigators hired by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in May 2006. The report also analyzes phone records from March 2006, linking a specific individual who intimidated a victim directly to phone numbers registered to Epstein's corporations at 457 Madison Ave, including Ghislaine Corporation and El Zorro Ranch Corporation. The investigator notes a pattern where the intimidator would call the victim and immediately communicate with Epstein's office.
This Palm Beach Police incident report from 2006 details an investigation into aggressive surveillance by private investigators hired by Jeffrey Epstein or his legal team. It documents a specific incident where a subject was run off the road by a PI in a green Chevy. The report also analyzes phone records showing a pattern where an individual (suspect) called a victim for intimidation purposes, and immediately afterward communicated with Epstein's assistant and a corporate number registered to Epstein's business address at 457 Madison Ave.
This is a 'Order of No Contact' issued by the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, against Jeffrey Epstein. Filed on November 18, 2009, but retroactive to June 30, 2008 ('nunc pro tunc'), it prohibits Epstein from contacting a redacted alleged victim. A handwritten exception allows Epstein's attorneys or agents to have contact solely for the purposes of a civil lawsuit.
This document is a 'Motion to Intervene' filed on June 15, 2009, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008CF009381AXX). An unnamed (redacted) applicant, represented by Spencer T. Kuvin, seeks to intervene to join the Palm Beach Post in arguing for access to the sealed Federal non-prosecution agreement. The applicant argues they have a pending civil complaint against Epstein with similar allegations and require the sealed document for discovery and impeachment purposes.
This document is a motion filed on June 3, 2009, by a redacted nonparty (a victim of Jeffrey Epstein) seeking to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum in the Florida state criminal case. The motion argues the sealing violated Florida judicial rules and public policy, and that the documents are material to the victim's pending civil suit. Exhibits include judgments of conviction against Epstein for solicitation and procuring a minor, sealing orders from 2008, and transcripts from the June 30, 2008 plea conference where the existence of the federal NPA was discussed in open court.
A court order from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, setting a hearing for May 29, 2009. The hearing concerns a motion by a redacted nonparty to vacate an order sealing records and to unseal records in the case of State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Copies were sent to the Assistant State Attorney, Epstein's lawyer Jack Goldberger, and William J. Berger, attorney for an individual identified as E.W.
This document is a declaration by FBI Special Agent Timothy R. Slater, executed in 2015, detailing his involvement in the 2006-2007 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Slater describes locating and calling a potential victim (whose name is redacted) in early 2007 while accompanied by lead agent Nesbitt E. Kuyrkendall. During the call, the woman confirmed knowing Epstein but refused to cooperate, stating she had moved away to distance herself and wanted to leave the situation in her past.
This document is an email chain from June 2023 between the New York State Office of Victim Services and a federal agent (likely FBI). The OVS employee requests an 'FBI Verification form' for a specific individual, explicitly stating that the agent had previously confirmed the individual was a 'vetted victim of Epstein.' The agent replies from New Orleans, mentioning they are in training and will contact a 'case agent' to locate the form, while also referencing work on the 'One Taste' case and a recent arrest associated with it.
An April 2023 email chain between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent regarding the discovery of potential Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). During a legal review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender that potentially depicted minors. The Estate halted the review and reported the finding to the FBI for guidance.
This document is an email chain from April 19, 2023, between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent from the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking division. Ruzumna reports that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video potentially containing child pornography (CSAM) depicting topless women, which had been shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The emails coordinate a phone call between the attorneys and the FBI to discuss the discovery and next steps.
This document is a chain of emails from April 2023 between lawyers representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Patterson Belknap and Hughes Hubbard) and the FBI Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. The lawyers report finding a video potentially containing Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) among 1,100 videos extracted from Epstein's files during a document review. They arrange a meeting at the Hughes Hubbard offices in New York to discuss the finding and hand over information to the FBI.
This document is a background check summary (marked U//FOUO) on an unidentified individual. It lists results from Accurint (addresses in CA and NV between 1999-2021), a negative result from NCIC/Ejustice criminal checks, and open-source findings linking the individual to Epstein's flight manifests (specifically citing page 49 of Epstein's Black Book). The document contains the Bates number EFTA00038985.
This document is an email thread from October 2021 between an FBI Special Agent from the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. They are discussing the location and retrieval of handwritten interview notes from August 2006 (likely related to the original Epstein investigation) for use as '3500 materials' (Jencks Act disclosures) in an upcoming legal deadline. The FBI agent confirms locating the notes in an evidence container labeled 'MM13' and a folder marked 'Flight Records FAA-AMOC'.
An email chain from June 2022 in which an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York contacts a law enforcement partner. The attorney is gathering personal information (DOB, SSN, GS scale) to include the partner in a nomination for a DOJ Director's Award for 'Superior Performance by a Litigation Team' regarding the Epstein / Maxwell case, specifically citing efforts with victims.
An email dated December 14, 2021, sent by a Forensic Accountant at the FBI New York Field Office to a redacted recipient. The subject is 'Research' and it includes an attachment titled '31000201353855_transcript.pdf'. The specific names of the individuals involved are redacted.
This document is an email chain from September 2021 regarding the transfer of evidence in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. An Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY requests 'Amazon returns' related to Maxwell, and a respondent confirms the upload of these files (both original and Bates-stamped versions SDNY_GM_00000966-976) to a USAfx folder.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between FBI agents (Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit) and USANYS/SDNY personnel. The discussion concerns the urgent retrieval of 'hotline tracking spreadsheets' related to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The requestor specifically notes the need for these documents to satisfy '3500' obligations (referring to the Jencks Act discovery requirements) and sets up a secure USAfx folder to transfer the data.
This document is a printed LinkedIn profile for an individual based in Irvine, California, dated October 8, 2019. The profile details a work history that includes a significant role from October 1996 to January 2003 managing '7 personal estates worldwide' and '11 corporate apartments' for a 'high profile, high net worth Entrepreneur,' duties which strongly align with the known estate management structure of Jeffrey Epstein. The individual also lists experience in investment advisory firms and real estate, along with an MBA from Strayer University.
This document is an NYPD Special Victims Unit Hotline Notification Worksheet dated January 15, 2022. It details a report received via the Human Trafficking Hotline regarding a mentally ill female victim (CV) who is believed to be sex trafficked. The narrative states the victim, who has the mentality of a 13-year-old, leaves with 'old and rich' men for money and was located at a suspected brothel via Instagram messages.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between a USANYS contractor and an FBI Special Agent (Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit). They are coordinating the transfer of 'hotline tracking spreadsheets' and 'email tips' related to the Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein investigations to ensure compliance with '3500' (Jencks Act) discovery obligations. The FBI agent confirms uploading SDNY leads to a USAfx folder with assistance from a colleague named Kimberly.
An email thread between a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and an unnamed individual regarding a video interview. The interview was originally scheduled for January 5, 2021, but was cancelled by the recipient, prompting the detective to offer rescheduling options. The correspondence mentions an FBI Special Agent partner and coordination with prosecutors.
This document is an email from January 18, 2021, proposing a video conference for Friday, January 29th at 2pm New York time. It references an earlier email from January 16, 2021, where the sender mentioned CCing their partner from the FBI and looking forward to speaking during the week of January 25th. Redactions are present for names and email addresses.
This document is an email thread from March and April 2021 between a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and an unnamed individual. The detective attempts to schedule an interview, to which the individual responds cautiously, stating they want to hear what their lawyers say before agreeing. They eventually schedule a virtual meeting for March 30, 2021, at 11 AM Texas time, though the detective follows up again on April 16 asking for a call.
This document is an email thread from January 2021 involving an individual named Byrne (likely an FBI agent) and FBI agent Mandy Young coordinating a video conference with an unnamed recipient. The meeting was scheduled for Friday, January 29, 2021, at 2 pm New York time. The correspondence indicates an ongoing investigation or interview process occurring post-2020.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | College/Writer | $0.00 | Potential payment for college tuition. | View |
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | Writer | $0.00 | Purchase of a travel ticket ('bought me a ticke... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED WITNESS] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Witness stated he would like to reimburse [reda... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein o... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $100.00 | Payment for going with her to Jeff's house and ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | The text mentions 'offering [REDACTED]', implyi... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein paid for her to [redacted]. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein's organiz... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Christmas gift via Western Union | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (low end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (high end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Cash payments given after massages, initially f... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Subject stated they 'was paid well and they bot... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (range start) | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (range end, depending on travel... | View |
| N/A | Received | Baby's father / O... | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Alleged payment mentioned in school rumors for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein provided [Redacted] to travel to Epstei... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Received monies for the same thing (amount unsp... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment after the massage incident | View |
Let me know when you get in today and I’ll give you a call. I’m around today until around noon your time with one call at 10:30 -11.
Thanks. Would 10 am work? I’m at 646-612-0825.
Instruction to burn the ZIP file to a DVD and call when ready for pickup.
Sending attached zip folder with 2015-2019 tax returns. Noting that the full Financial Report Appendices are still loading onto USAFx.
Email transmitting an attachment named WOLSEN_20201211131426410_DRAFT.pdf
Email header containing metadata and an embedded message attachment regarding financial report appendices.
Email header information regarding 'Maxwell Financial Report Appendices'. Contains embedded message file name.
The standard principle is that extradition should be sought only where it is necessary and proportionate to do so. If a RP indicated a willingness to fully abide by conditions of bail etc then it would be a matter for the US authorities as to whether to accept those terms. If the RP returned to the UK but then reneged on the deal, then the failure to comply with such undertakings would inevitably lead to a Request for extradition and would be a factor on whether the person is detained on bail or in custody. If the RP was to offer a consent, the judge in court would need to satisfy himself that the RP had received appropriate legal advice, because it is irrevocable and there is no ground to appeal. The SSHD would then have a month to arrange the surrender. The only consent that matters is the one before the extradition judge in the UK and it will usually be determined at the initial hearing but can be offered at any time before the extradition hearing has concluded. There is no caselaw on this to my mind but the relevant statutory provisions are s 72 (7)(b) and 72(8) for full order, s74 (7)(b) and s74 (8) for provisional arrest and s127 and s128 on consent: irrevocable point/legal advice and sending of case to SSHD.
Here is the feedback from the Crown Prosecution Service. As noted, a consent in the US would not be binding on a court in the U.K. (I can pull the relevant Extradition Act provisions cited below) While I suggested in our call this is the kind of colloquy necessary for a guilty plea, I am reminded that consent to extradited is irrevocable and not appealable – no so with a plea. I will try to write something up today, but my DOJ computer has been acting up.
Forwards an email chain.
Follow-up email asking for the best method to transfer materials.
Sharing an article mentioned previously describing comments by a redacted individual.
Forwarding original email.
Dear Anne-Marie - I hope you are well. It has been too long since we have talked! I have a UK extradition question which has been raised by a UK citz facing a US crime and currently being detained in the US. The defendant is seeking bail in the US and wants to execute a prophylactic “consent to be extradited” from the UK as proof that he is not a flight risk. My understanding of UK law is that even if a defendant consents to be extradited, a UK judge still has to independently be satisfied that the extradition comports with UK law. So for instance, if the defendant is released, flees to the UK, and then faces UK extradition, that consent may be evidence, but a UK judge would still have to decide on all factors potentially applicable at the time of the extradition. (The defendant may also claim that his prophylactic consent was coerced by his condition in the US.) Do I have that right? Is there a case or two which I can cite for standards for that proposition?
Hi [REDACTED] I got a bounce back from Anne-Marie. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks for your email. I think the difficulty here is as you mention – The consent given to the US authorities would not be binding on the RP in the UK or on the UK court. Consent to extradition must be given irrevocably in writing to the UK court under s72 (8) Extradition Act 2003. In other words what the RP is offering in the US is a promise to consent before the UK court, which is unenforceable. I hope that assists – I don’t have a case to hand. Anne-Marie returns tomorrow and may be able to add.
Initial notification that financial report appendices (3GB zip folder) were received from Maxwell's defense team. Offering options for transfer: forward link, USAFx upload, or hard drive copy.
Discussing a review of a recent bail submission and requesting a meeting/call.
Coordinating a call regarding the previous email.
Works for me, thanks.
Confirming availability for the next hour and offering to circulate a dial-in number.
Sending attached zip folder containing the second and final part of exhibits pertaining to Maxwell's renewed bail application.
Sending attached zip folder containing exhibits pertaining to Maxwell's renewed bail application.
Forwarding court notice; body redacted.
Request for the BOP's Psychological Reconstruction of Inmate Jeffrey Epstein and the MCC's response for discovery evaluation in the Tartaglione trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity