| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jim Eisenberg
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker 'A'
|
Co conspirators coordinators |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Woman
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Caller/Victim
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED]
|
Professional supervisory |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A redacted individual accompanied the interviewee to the encounters 'twice'. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The process of arranging for girls to visit Jeffrey. When Jeffrey was in town, a redacted person ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The interviewee provided massages and was paid $200 each time. The client would sometimes masturb... | An unspecified location ref... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A briefing conversation where a redacted female associate of Epstein's advised the interviewee ab... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with a redacted individual. The interview was held pursuant to a ... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted by the FBI with an individual represented by counsel, pursuant to... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with an individual (name redacted) by the FBI and an Assistant U.... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 22 items of property as evidence in the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 19 items of property/evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 24 categories of property/evidence by law enforcement. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of property/evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
This document contains a log of digital messages exchanged between March 21 and March 22, 2019. The conversation is between a redacted individual and 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein). They discuss an unidentified male described as a 'legend' and 'super smart,' contrasting him with Noam Chomsky, while also mentioning scheduling and 'the emblem of the movement.'
A digital communication log dated March 21, 2019, containing a conversation between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses travel to Vienna and Paris, specifically proposing a lunch meeting with former French Culture Minister Jacques Lang, whom the sender describes as a 'great friend' and advisor to Macron. The log confirms an invitation to Lang's home with 'No press' stipulated.
This document is a forensic log of digital messages from March 20, 2019, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The exchange reveals that Epstein was in Paris with an individual named 'reid' and planned to stay for 6 days, while the redacted individual had just arrived in Rome for a speech the following day. Epstein mentions that 'My girl' is waiting for the redacted individual's call.
This document is a House Oversight Committee record (page 027600) containing a log of digital messages from March 16-17, 2019. The conversation takes place between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias frequently linked to Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The messages discuss an unidentified female ('Our girl'), make a sarcastic reference to 'the next future ex-mrs. bannon' (likely referencing Steve Bannon), and mention Brazilian politician Bolsonaro as a 'good segue'.
This document contains a log of digital messages exchanged between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual in March 2019. The conversation includes a cryptic reference to someone in a wheelchair and a metaphorical discussion about the 'band breaking up' in response to an NPR article about the winding down of the Mueller investigation. The document appears to be evidence produced for the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a log of digital messages from March 12-13, 2019, primarily sent by 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an email associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation reacts to news of Paul Manafort facing charges in New York, with the participants noting that 'shit just got real' and referencing 'Attica' (prison) and risks. The document originates from a House Oversight investigation.
This document contains a log of text messages exchanged on March 12, 2019, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an email alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on internal dysfunction within the Trump administration, specifically mentioning Mike Pence's lack of loyalty, a power struggle between John Kelly and Jared Kushner, and a suggestion that Mike Pompeo would be a better Vice President. The exchange also touches on the stability of the British pound amidst the Brexit vote.
This document is a log of electronic messages from March 12, 2019, primarily involving the account 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The content shifts from copied text regarding legal definitions of misdemeanors/felonies and a financial settlement involving Merrill Lynch to political gossip. Specifically, the sender claims that 'Djt' (Donald Trump) is unhappy with Mike Pence and believes Mike Pompeo would be a better Vice President.
This document is a log of digital communications from March 12, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves Epstein sharing a New York Times article concerning Donald Trump and Deutsche Bank, followed by a discussion of the 'Martin Act,' a New York anti-fraud law. Epstein pastes an excerpt (likely from Wikipedia given the citation brackets) explaining the Martin Act's use by Eliot Spitzer against Merrill Lynch.
This document is a forensic extraction log of an SMS/iMessage conversation from March 2019 between 'jee' (using the email jeeitunes@gmail.com, an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses international political figures, specifically mentioning efforts to position 'Abe' (likely Shinzo Abe) in relation to right-wing leaders Bolsonaro, Orban, and Salvini. The exchange also includes a reference to sending an email and a request for a 'copy of brink'.
This document is a log of three digital messages exchanged on March 7, 2019. Jeffrey Epstein, using the alias 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com', corresponds with a redacted individual regarding a media statement suggested by an associate named 'Kathy.' Epstein corrects a typo in his message, clarifying that the statement is intended for 'Wapo' (The Washington Post) rather than 'Waco.'
This document contains a log of digital messages from March 5, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an email alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on a PR and legal strategy to counter a 'pervert hermit image' by shifting the narrative and sticking to legal arguments. The redacted sender shares a New York Times article regarding Robert Kraft's defense in a solicitation case as a reference point.
This document is a forensic extraction of iMessages from March 5, 2019, recovered from a Macintosh user account 'jee'. A sender identifying themselves as 'Miro' uses the email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' to message a redacted recipient about the European Parliament and proposes a breakfast meeting for Saturday. The redacted recipient responds simply with 'Japan', likely indicating their location or unavailability.
This document is a digital message log from February 27, 2019, extracted from a device associated with the email alias 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (linked to Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation covers two main topics: a legal PR strategy to discredit accusers ('the girls') by claiming they only sought to overturn agreements after receiving money, and a discussion about Donald Trump and Michael Cohen's testimony before Congress occurring that day. The document is marked with a House Oversight Committee footer.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from February 27, 2019, between 'jee' (using the email jeeitunes@gmail.com, associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation references Michael Cohen's congressional testimony occurring that day and asks who might write a news story favorable to Alexander Acosta. The chat spans from 2:55 AM to 4:01 PM.
This document is a House Oversight Committee log of electronic messages involving the email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) from February 5-6, 2019. The messages discuss Donald Trump's nomination of David Malpass to the World Bank as a distraction from negative attention, and detail a recent meeting with 'bg' (likely Bill Gates) involving discussions of science and eating cheeseburgers. The correspondent notes that 'bg' asked about Epstein's well-being but remained silent when told he owed Epstein a call.
This document is a forensic log of digital messages from February 4, 2019. It captures a conversation between a redacted individual (likely a medical professional or researcher) and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeeitunes@gmail.com). The redacted sender discusses publishing a paper on 'acute thrombectomy' in the American Heart Association Stroke journal, corrects a typo ('cute thrombectomy'), mentions preparing slides for 'bg' (possibly Bill Gates or a background presentation), and notes having '5 more cases today'. Epstein replies simply with 'K'.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from February 4, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation begins with a warning from 'jee' about someone taking an interest in the recipient, followed by the recipient sharing news about a published paper and establishing a 'clot bank' at 'UW' (likely University of Washington). The document is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
This document contains a log of electronic messages exchanged on February 2, 2019, between the email address 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation begins with a query about whether 'Honduran maids qualify' and transitions to scheduling a breakfast meeting that includes a third individual named 'Wolf'. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027574', indicating its origin from a congressional investigation.
This document is a forensic extraction of a digital conversation from February 2, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes') and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses a 'heads up' given by 'Whittaker' regarding 'troubles,' likely referring to legal issues, and specifically asks about the involvement of the 'southern district' (SDNY). The chat also touches on constitutional arguments regarding indictments and concludes with a query about flight plans for that evening.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from February 1-2, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The exchange begins with the redacted individual cancelling a breakfast meeting, to which Epstein replies 'No worry.' Later, at nearly 3:00 AM, Epstein sends a link to a National Constitution Center podcast about presidential emergency powers regarding the border wall, commenting that it 'lays out the argument well.'
This document is a forensic extraction of text messages from December 10, 2018, sourced from House Oversight Committee records. The messages appear to be from a politically influential figure (sender name redacted) who boasts about their speech causing the fall of the Belgian government and facilitating meetings between Flemish and Walloon nationalists. The messages also reference the SDNY (Southern District of New York), Brexit, the 'gilets jaunes' protests involving Macron, and the start of an event in Marrakech (likely the UN Migration Pact conference), expressing disapproval of someone named 'Miro'.
This document is a digital forensic log of a text message exchange from December 6, 2018, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known Epstein alias) and a redacted individual. They discuss a film concept involving global markets, immortality, and the 'depravity of elite society,' with a specific question about whether 'Woody' gets a cameo. The document originates from the House Oversight Committee.
This document is a digital communication log from December 6, 2018, marked as House Oversight evidence. It details a conversation between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The discussion involves confirmation that 'Chomsky' is 'all in,' followed by an inquiry regarding 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine), with the redacted sender noting she has a 'jealous' boyfriend, to which the jeeitunes account responds dismissively ('So what').
This document is a forensic log of text messages from December 6, 2018, extracted from a device associated with Jeffrey Epstein (using the email alias jeeitunes@gmail.com). The conversation is between Epstein and a redacted individual, discussing the return of Mohammed bin Salman's (MBS) brother to Washington D.C. to 'show strength,' noting he is the only one MBS trusts. The conversation also includes casual references to fast food (Dominos Pizza and KFC), with Epstein quoting the phrase 'parts is parts'.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | College/Writer | $0.00 | Potential payment for college tuition. | View |
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | Writer | $0.00 | Purchase of a travel ticket ('bought me a ticke... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED WITNESS] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Witness stated he would like to reimburse [reda... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein o... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $100.00 | Payment for going with her to Jeff's house and ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | The text mentions 'offering [REDACTED]', implyi... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein paid for her to [redacted]. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein's organiz... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Christmas gift via Western Union | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (low end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (high end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Cash payments given after massages, initially f... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Subject stated they 'was paid well and they bot... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (range start) | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (range end, depending on travel... | View |
| N/A | Received | Baby's father / O... | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Alleged payment mentioned in school rumors for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein provided [Redacted] to travel to Epstei... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Received monies for the same thing (amount unsp... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment after the massage incident | View |
The officer received a return call stating that another individual would be attending family therapy sessions.
Interviewee provided items via Grand Jury Subpoena (content redacted).
For a good time call [Redacted]
Discussion about whether witness was going to press charges and if parents knew about 'Jeffery'. Mentioned Epstein needed someone to work tomorrow.
He's absolutely right
Israel election April 9 brexit 12 arab league today - im free after 7pm
After sexual encounters with male friends, Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein would ask the redacted individual 'explicit questions about what went on'.
After sexual encounters with male friends, Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein would ask the redacted individual 'explicit questions about what went on'.
After sexual encounters with male friends, Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein would ask the redacted individual 'explicit questions about what went on'.
The interviewee spoke with a redacted person on the phone to make appointments to see Jeffrey.
The witness learned of Mr. Epstein through a person whose name is redacted in the transcript.
The lady said 'oh, bye' to a redacted individual as it was time to leave.
A recorded interview where 'MP' questions a redacted individual about the physical details of a past event, seemingly involving a massage.
A redacted person asked the narrator, 'how did you like it. Like how much did he give you, how much did he pay you.' The narrator replied, '$300'.
A redacted person told the speaker to claim she was 18 to gain entry to the man's house.
The lady said, 'oh, bye [REDACTED]'.
The witness learned of Mr. Epstein through a person whose name is redacted in the transcript.
A redacted person told the speaker to claim she was 18 to gain entry to the man's house.
The witness learned of Mr. Epstein through a person whose name is redacted in the transcript.
A redacted female individual told the interviewee that other girls were setting up girls to give Jeffrey Epstein massages, which were to be strictly massages with no other physical contact.
A redacted person told the speaker to claim she was 18 to gain entry to the man's house.
A redacted person told the speaker to claim she was 18 to gain entry to the man's house.
The witness learned of Mr. Epstein through a person whose name is redacted in the transcript.
A conversation where a redacted individual, a friend of the interviewee, told them they could go to Mr. Epstein's house to give a legitimate massage with no sexual contact.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity