| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[REDACTED Interviewee]
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED victim]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Clients
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Government Official]
|
Professional adversarial investigative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Interviews in Florida | Florida | View |
| 2021-01-11 | N/A | Proposed Virtual Interview (originally scheduled for 5:30 PM EST) | Virtual / Secure Video Line | View |
| 2019-08-18 | N/A | Scheduled legal visit for a detainee. | Correctional Facility (Impl... | View |
| 2006-08-15 | N/A | FBI Interview of Epstein's pilot. | West Palm Beach, Florida | View |
This document is an email thread from January 2021 between an individual located in the UK and a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. The detective attempts to schedule a virtual interview for Monday, January 11th, noting that an in-person meeting in New York is no longer preferred. The interviewee agrees to the virtual format but requests that their attorney be allowed to listen in and asks for an earlier time slot due to the time difference in the UK.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated March 26, 2021. Prosecutors on the 'Maxwell team' request approval from US Attorney Audrey Strauss to issue a 'friendly subpoena' to an attorney interviewed in Florida. The purpose is to obtain a confidential 2009 settlement agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and a victim, which serves as evidence for the ongoing investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell's participation in the abuse of underage girls.
This document contains an email chain from March 2020 between an attorney and likely a prosecutor regarding a legal submission on behalf of a redacted client. The attorney argues that the client was a 'vulnerable victim' and merely a 'cog in Epstein's wheel,' requesting a non-prosecution agreement ('non-pros'). The correspondence also highlights the impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on the legal proceedings and the client's mental health while in NYC.
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between government prosecutors and an attorney representing nine potential Epstein/Maxwell victims. Following Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest, the attorney contacted the government stating that at least one client, who had previously refused to cooperate in January 2020, was now 'ready to help.' The government requests client names and filed lawsuits to conduct conflict checks and proposes scheduling an 'attorney proffer' to gather information.
This FBI FD-302 report documents an August 15, 2006, interview with a pilot employed by Jeffrey Epstein. The pilot detailed Epstein's flight staff, including two other full-time pilots, a flight engineer, and a contract pilot used in 2004-2005. The report notes a specific conflict where a pilot was demoted and suffered a pay cut because Epstein was unhappy with their landing techniques at Palm Beach International Airport.
This FBI document from May 31, 2008, records the service of a Grand Jury Subpoena to a female individual in New York related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation (WSTA - Child Prostitution). Two FBI agents attempted to interview the individual at her residence, but she refused to speak, invoking her right to counsel and providing her attorney's business card. The document encloses an FD-302 interview form and the subpoena return for the Miami division.
Requesting client complaints and names; proposing an attorney proffer schedule.
Asking about scheduling; mentions clearing things with client and sending complaint next week.
Recalling Jan 2020 refusal to cooperate; acknowledging change in stance; requesting lawsuits and names; explaining need for attorney proffer.
Stating client is ready to help despite previous refusal; links to NY Post article.
Discussing delays in drafting a submission due to the client's fragile state and the onset of Coronavirus lockdowns. Mentions attorneys are working from home.
Confirming receipt, thanks.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity