Chief of the Criminal Division
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
AUSA [Redacted]
|
Corresponded with |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Proposed meeting dates (Jan 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) between Estate representatives and the Chief of th... | View |
EFTA00026549.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from January 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for a client referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted]' (likely a key Epstein associate given the context and date). The correspondence reveals urgent negotiations regarding 'proffers' and potential charges, with prosecutors stating that 'offenses can be charged now' but offering the defense a chance to present to the U.S. Attorney before a final decision. The emails specifically demand information regarding the client's recollection of observing Jeffrey Epstein in sexual activity, nude circumstances, or massages with other women/girls.
EFTA00024512.pdf
This document contains an email thread from December 2019 between the United States Attorney's Office (implied) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). The estate's counsel requests search warrant inventories for Epstein's New York and New Mexico properties and proposes a meeting to discuss the government's potential forfeiture claims. The government response notes that the criminal case is 'now-defunct,' directs them to discovery previously provided to defense counsel (referencing specific Bates numbers), and clarifies that the government had not searched the New Mexico property.
EFTA00024510.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between the US Attorney's Office (Government) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). The Estate's counsel requests search warrant returns and inventories for Epstein's New York and New Mexico properties and proposes a meeting to discuss resolving potential forfeiture claims. The Government responds by noting that defense counsel was required to destroy discovery materials after the case was nolle prossed, but provides Bates number references for documents previously produced regarding the New York property and clarifies that the New Mexico property was not searched.
EFTA00024507.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between legal representatives for the Epstein Estate (Trustees) and Government officials (likely SDNY). The Estate is requesting search warrant inventories for Epstein's New York and New Mexico properties to aid in estate administration. The Government clarifies that previous defense counsel destroyed or returned discovery materials following Epstein's suicide but provides specific Bates numbers for relevant documents and discusses scheduling a meeting to resolve potential forfeiture claims.
EFTA00019904.pdf
This email thread from December 2019 is between a government official (Alex) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). They discuss the logistics of providing search warrant returns/inventories from the 'now-defunct criminal case' to the estate trustees, specifically regarding properties in New York and the island. The emails also coordinate a future meeting to discuss resolving the government's potential forfeiture claims against the estate.
EFTA00016997.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from January 2020 between defense counsel and federal prosecutors (likely SDNY and FBI) negotiating a high-stakes 'proffer' meeting. The prosecutors express urgency, stating that 'offenses can be charged now,' and arrange a meeting for January 24, 2020, attended by the U.S. Attorney and FBI leadership, to hear the defense's presentation before charges are filed. The correspondence explicitly discusses a client (Ms. [Redacted]) and her recollection of observing Jeffrey Epstein engaged in sexual activity or observing other women in sexually suggestive circumstances.
Emails between AUSA and Chief of the Criminal Division
Emails between an AUSA and the Chief of the Criminal Division.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity