Alger Hiss
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Richard Nixon
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Alger Hiss confronting Whittaker Chambers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Conviction of Alger Hiss for committing perjury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alger Hiss Trial | USA | View |
| 1948-01-01 | N/A | Alger Hiss case | Unknown | View |
| 1947-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Two special grand juries were convened pertaining to the espionage investigation of Alger Hiss. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015092.jpg
This legal document discusses precedents for unsealing grand jury testimony of historical significance. It cites the case of David Greenglass, whose testimony in the Rosenberg trial was released after his death, and the case of Alger Hiss, where grand jury transcripts from an espionage investigation were unsealed after fifty years due to public interest.
DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
This document is page 24 of a court filing (likely an order or opinion) in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text discusses a legal analysis regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials, weighing the defendant's (Maxwell) opposition against the public interest. The Court concludes that the specific factor of 'public interest' weighs decisively against unsealing because the materials consist of summary testimony by law enforcement that is already public record due to the trial, and lacks the historical significance found in cases like the Rosenbergs or Alger Hiss.
DOJ-OGR-00015152.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Doc 809) in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against unsealing grand jury materials, claiming the Government has not met the 'special circumstances' burden. The text extensively cites the precedent 'In re Biaggi,' arguing that unsealing is only justified to correct misleading public characterizations, and suggests the Government's current motion is a 'diversion' rather than true transparency.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015128.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir included in House Oversight files (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015128). The narrator details a failed plan by the 'White House Plumbers' to use Patricia Ellsberg's dental records to accuse her of espionage, an idea the narrator claims was inspired by a conversation with Alger Hiss regarding Whittaker Chambers. The text highlights the narrator's belief that the public would believe the accusation simply because of its absurdity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015126.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript, memoir, or narrative account written from the perspective of Richard Nixon. It details interactions with his Chief of Staff, H.R. Haldeman, including an incident in the Oval Office involving blind veterans and a later encounter backstage at the Grand Ole Opry with Johnny Cash. The text highlights tensions between the narrator and Haldeman, specifically mentioning a 'betrayal.' While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp often associated with recent investigations, the content is historically focused on the Nixon administration and does not contain direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015103.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript included in House Oversight files (likely related to a larger investigation involving intelligence or political history). The text recounts a conversation with Walter Cronkite regarding his emotional reaction to the JFK assassination and LBJ's succession. It further details Robert Kennedy's 1962 interest in the Alger Hiss case and his 1968 political overture to Jim Garrison, as well as Howard Hughes's efforts to prolong the Vietnam War to protect helicopter defense contracts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015100.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a memoir or transcript attributed to Richard Nixon (identified by context regarding the Vice Presidency and 1960 debates). The text discusses the writing of a book chapter with H.R. Haldeman regarding the Alger Hiss case, claiming the FBI planted a fake typewriter. It further reflects on how the Hiss conviction launched Nixon's political career and how Kennedy's charisma on television cost him the presidency.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015096.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (potentially controversial or conspiratorial in nature given the content claims) stamped with a House Oversight identifier. The text is written in the first person by a U.S. Congressman involved in the House UnAmerican Activities Committee (strongly implying Richard Nixon) discussing the Alger Hiss case. The narrator claims the famous 'pumpkin papers' evidence was forged using a specially constructed Woodstock typewriter and that Eastman Kodak proved the film stock post-dated the alleged 1938 evidence. The text also bizarrely connects Charles Schulz's 'Peanuts' character 'Woodstock' to this event.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015095.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or narrative account (likely attributed to Richard Nixon) produced as part of a House Oversight discovery (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015095). The text details the narrator's introduction to Howard Hughes via Herman Perry and Murray Chotiner. It describes Hughes asserting dominance over Nixon's political future ('I own the ocean') and mentions the narrator's distrust of the Justice Department stemming from the 1948 Alger Hiss case. While the user prompt references Epstein, the content of this specific page is historically focused on Nixon and Hughes.
Whittaker Chambers' teeth
Hiss explained he wanted to see Chambers' teeth to verify his identity.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity