| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Adeagbo
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Singh
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-05 | Court case | The case of Adeagbo v Government of the United States of America, an unreported case involving wi... | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Court case | The case of Singh v Government of the United States of America [2019] EWHC 1800 (Admin), involvin... | N/A | View |
| 2007-04-26 | Treaty ratification | The extradition treaty signed on 31 March 2003 was ratified. | N/A | View |
| 2003-03-31 | Treaty signing | An extradition treaty was signed between the United Kingdom and the United States of America. | N/A | View |
A certificate recognizing Michael A. Thomas for twenty years of service in the United States Government, dated June 20, 2019, and signed by Warden L. N' Diaye. This document establishes Thomas's long tenure shortly before the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death at the MCC.
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated December 14, 2020, analyzing the potential human rights objections Ghislaine Maxwell might raise against extradition to the US. The text specifically argues that Maxwell is unlikely to succeed in claiming a violation of Article 3 of the ECHR regarding prison conditions, citing numerous legal precedents where such claims were rejected. Footnotes reference specific cases and US detention facilities (MDC and MCC) in New York.
This page from a legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, discusses procedures for extradition cases, specifically focusing on the effect of consenting to extradition and the legal framework for granting bail. It outlines the statutory considerations for bail under the Bail Act 1976 and notes that in recent US bail appeals before the High Court, bail has been consistently refused, citing the cases of Adeagbo and Singh as examples.
This document is page 6 of 29 from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 14, 2020. It outlines the legal framework and procedural hurdles for appealing extradition in the United Kingdom under the Extradition Act 2003, noting the specific roles of the Secretary of State, High Court, and Supreme Court. The text emphasizes the rarity of successful appeals to the Supreme Court or the European Court of Human Rights in extradition cases.
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, outlines the extradition arrangements between the United Kingdom and the United States. It specifies that the process is governed by the UK's Extradition Act 2003 and a bilateral treaty signed in 2003, which designates the U.S. as a 'Part 2 territory'. This designation exempts the U.S. from the standard requirement to provide prima facie evidence when requesting an extradition from the UK.
This document is a sworn affidavit from Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 14, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In the affidavit, Maxwell confirms her identity, her citizenship in the US, UK, and France, and her incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. She attests that she has reviewed the indictment with her lawyers and understands her rights concerning a potential extradition request from the United States to the United Kingdom.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity