| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-07 | Court decision | A court in S.D.N.Y. ruled in United States v. Eley that the defendant's request for release was n... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-04-07 | Court ruling | A ruling was made in the case of United States v. Eley, denying a request for release. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 13, 2020, argues against a defendant's motion for temporary release. It cites two prior rulings from the Southern District of New York (involving Gonzalez and Eley) to establish that release is not necessary, especially when trials are not imminent. The document further contends that the detention center (MDC) has been responsive and accommodating to defense counsel's requests for client access, undermining the argument that release is required for defense preparation.
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2020, argues against a defendant's request for temporary release by citing two recent S.D.N.Y. precedents (involving Gonzalez and Eley) where release was denied due to trials not being imminent. The filing also asserts that the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) has been responsive and accommodating to defense counsel's requests for client access, undermining the claim that release is necessary for trial preparation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity