Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Southern District of Florida prosecutors

Organization
Mentions
6
Relationships
2
Events
5
Documents
3
Also known as:
Florida Prosecutors
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Epstein
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal negotiation A Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was negotiated and entered into with Southern District of Flori... Florida View
N/A N/A Negotiation and execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Southern District of Florida View
N/A N/A Negotiation of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Florida View
2008-01-01 N/A Epstein's plea deal negotiation and subsequent jail time/probation. Florida View
2007-01-01 N/A Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed in Florida. Florida View

DOJ-OGR-00021087.jpg

This legal document is a page from a defendant's brief arguing that the court made an error. The defendant contends the court improperly applied the 'Annabi' rule from the Second Circuit to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that was negotiated in Florida, which falls under the Eleventh Circuit. The argument is that since the NPA was negotiated with Florida prosecutors in exchange for Epstein's guilty plea in a Florida state court, Eleventh Circuit law should apply instead.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016504.jpg

This document is the conclusion page (p. 17) of a legal motion filed on January 11, 2018, by NYP Holdings, Inc. (the New York Post). The Post is requesting a court order to unseal appellate briefs related to the Epstein case, with victim names redacted. They argue that the burden of notifying victims should fall on the Manhattan District Attorney or Florida Prosecutors, not the Post.

Legal filing (conclusion of memorandum/motion)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016497.jpg

This document is page 10 of a legal motion filed by 'The Post' (a media organization) in a New York court. The motion requests the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex-offender registration (SORA) proceedings, with victim names redacted. It details procedural history, including the withdrawal of a previous motion from December 21 to resolve disputes over notifying Florida prosecutors, and notes the Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Friedman Agnifilo's stance on the unsealing.

Legal motion / court filing (excerpt)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search