Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Wicker

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
1
Events
2
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
location United States
Legal representative
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1988-01-01 Court decision The 10th Circuit court issued a decision in the case of United States v. Wicker. 10th Circuit View
1988-01-01 Court case Citation to United States v. Wicker, 848 F.2d 1059 (10th Cir.1988). 10th Circuit View

DOJ-OGR-00005603.jpg

This document is page 9 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The text presents a legal argument citing precedents (Katz, Campagnuolo, Wicker) regarding discovery violations, willful misconduct, and the suppression of evidence as a sanction. The filing argues that the government failed to comply with a disclosure order issued months prior and criticizes the government's bad faith in seeking reconsideration rather than compliance.

Legal filing / court order excerpt
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005602.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that precluding certain statements is the only appropriate remedy for a discovery violation. It cites Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(2)(C) and legal precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in *Taylor v. Illinois*, to establish that a court has the discretion to impose such a sanction. The argument rests on balancing a defendant's rights against public interests like the integrity of the trial process and the fair administration of justice.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005597.jpg

This document is a Table of Authorities from a legal filing (Document 384) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal precedents cited in the main document, including six court cases and three federal rules of procedure and evidence. The cases cited involve parties such as Taylor, Campagnuolo, Katz, Tellier, Tracy, and Wicker against the United States or the state of Illinois.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search