Lillian Hellman
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mary McCarthy
|
Adversarial literary |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980-05-11 | Publication | Publication of the article “An Appeal to Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy” by Norman Mailer in t... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002354.jpg
This legal document, part of the criminal case against Maxwell, argues that the government's prosecution is based on tainted evidence. The defense claims the government made false representations to circumvent a civil Protective Order from the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' defamation case, and therefore the perjury charges stemming from Maxwell's depositions in that case should be suppressed. The document provides factual background on the civil case, where Virginia Giuffre alleged Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were involved in a scheme to sexually abuse and traffic her.
DOJ-OGR-00002354(3).jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Motion to Suppress) from February 4, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the government made untrue representations regarding a redacted source who was instrumental in the prosecution and provided information before the investigation began. The text asserts that Maxwell would not have agreed to civil depositions in the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' case without the Protective Order, and argues the court should suppress the fruits of the government's misrepresentation, specifically the perjury counts arising from those depositions.
DOJ-OGR-00002354(1).jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing in the criminal case against Maxwell, argues that the government's prosecution is fundamentally flawed. The defense claims the government made untrue representations to circumvent a civil Protective Order from the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' defamation case, and improperly used Maxwell's deposition transcripts from that case to bring perjury charges. The document requests that the Court suppress this evidence or grant a hearing to investigate the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002351.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page iii) from a court filing (Document 134) in the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. It lists legal authorities and articles referenced in the main brief, including a New York Daily News article about federal prosecutors declining to pursue Epstein and Maxwell in 2016, and a New York Times piece by Norman Mailer. It also cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
DOJ-OGR-00002351(1).jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 134 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The page is a table of authorities, citing two newspaper articles, a federal rule of civil procedure, and a constitutional amendment. The articles reference a 1980 piece by Norman Mailer and a 2020 report that Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2016.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity