Fort Lauderdale, Florida
LocationRelationship Network
045.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein on July 10, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff lists 23 specific interrogatories regarding Epstein's finances, properties, travel, and alleged sexual abuse of minors, all of which Epstein refused to answer by invoking his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. The motion argues that Epstein's blanket refusals are improper and requests the court force him to answer or provide a privilege log.
044.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel filed on July 10, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida, requesting the court to force Jeffrey Epstein to answer 23 specific requests for admission in a civil suit brought by Jane Doe No. 2. Epstein had previously asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to refuse answering questions regarding his net worth (alleged to be over $1 billion), his financial support of modeling agency MC2, his ownership of foreign property, and specific allegations of sexual assault, battery, and sex trafficking of minors. The plaintiff argues that the Fifth Amendment cannot be used as a blanket refusal in a civil case and demands Epstein answer or provide specific justification for his silence.
043.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Request for Production filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON). The motion argues that Epstein has improperly asserted blanket Fifth Amendment privileges in response to sixteen specific requests for production of documents, including telephone records, appointment books, financial records, and correspondence. The Plaintiff requests the Court to order Epstein to answer the requests, provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocations, and produce a privilege log.
018.pdf
This is an Order of Transfer from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida regarding Case No. 10-80309-CIV-ZLOCH (Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffery Epstein). Judge William J. Zloch ordered the case transferred to Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 23, 2010, citing Internal Operating Procedures. Judge Marra accepted the transfer on April 27, 2010, and the case number was updated to 10-80309-CIV-MARRA.
016-01.pdf
This document is a court order (likely a proposed order attached as an exhibit, given the blank signature and 'Document 16-1' header) from the case Jane Doe No. 103 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. It grants the Plaintiff's agreed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of May 13, 2010, to file a response to Epstein's motion to dismiss Count VI.
040.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel filed on July 10, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiff Jane Doe (represented by Bradley Edwards). The motion requests the court to force Jeffrey Epstein to answer a set of interrogatories regarding his financial assets, net worth, foreign travel, property ownership, and alleged interactions with the plaintiff and other minor females. Epstein refused to answer nearly all questions (except for providing the name/address of the person answering), invoking his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights against self-incrimination and right to counsel.
061.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel filed on July 10, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The motion seeks to force Epstein to answer 23 specific Requests for Admission regarding his net worth (specifically if it exceeds $1 billion), his financial support of modeling agency MC2, his ownership of Caribbean property, and specific allegations of sexual battery, assault, and sex trafficking of minors. Epstein had previously refused to answer these questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
060.pdf
This is a Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Request for Production filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The motion seeks a court order requiring Epstein to answer 16 specific requests for production of documents (including telephone records, photos, tax returns, and passport copies) or to provide a privilege log, as Epstein has refused to produce documents by asserting a blanket Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The plaintiff argues that Epstein's boilerplate objections are invalid, violate local rules requiring a privilege log, and that he must provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocation for each request.
EFTA00038453.pdf
An email chain from February 27, 2020, discussing FBI coverage for therapy sessions for Epstein victims in West Palm Beach. The correspondence involves attorneys from Edwards Pottinger LLC inquiring about reimbursement for a therapist and verifying a list of victim names, which are redacted in the document.
EFTA00037939.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between a trial attorney from Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal investigators. The attorney informs the recipient that they represent four additional victims ready to speak about their experiences with Jeffrey Epstein and requests to schedule meetings during a victim briefing in New York on October 23 or 24. The recipient agrees to the meetings and suggests a preliminary discussion regarding the victims' backgrounds.
EFTA00037937.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 involving attorneys from Edwards Pottinger LLC and likely federal authorities (references to 'HQ'). The emails discuss coordinating interviews for victims of Jeffrey Epstein, specifically mentioning four additional victims ready to speak. The attorneys propose meetings in New York on October 23 or 24, coinciding with a 'victim briefing'.
EFTA00037927.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2020 between a Trial Attorney at Edwards Pottinger LLC and an FBI Special Agent in the New York Field Office's Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. They are coordinating a time for the FBI agent to speak with two victims represented by the law firm. The attorney also inquires about obtaining FBI Form 302s (interview reports) to verify previous victim interviews.
EFTA00037922.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2020 between a Trial Attorney at Edwards Pottinger LLC and an FBI Special Agent from the New York Field Office's Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. They are coordinating an interview schedule for two victims of Jeffrey Epstein represented by the law firm. The attorney also inquires about obtaining FBI Form 302s (interview reports) to verify previous victim interviews.
EFTA00037509.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 3, 2020, originating from Trial Attorney Brittany Henderson of Edwards Pottinger LLC to the FBI. The email details the structure and operation of the 'Epstein Claims Fund Program,' a voluntary compensation fund for victims of Jeffrey Epstein run independently by administrator Jordy Feldman. It clarifies that the FBI's only role in the agreement is that the administrator will inform claimants of counseling available through FBI Victim Services, and notes that the USVI Attorney General had previously delayed the program via a lien but an agreement has since been reached.
EFTA00032879.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York and their supervisors, requesting travel approval for the 'United States v. Epstein' investigation (Case ID 2018R01618). The emails, spanning from March 2019 to February 2020, detail planned trips to West Palm Beach, Los Angeles, Pensacola, and Stockholm for the purpose of interviewing witnesses and victims. The requests consistently reference the investigation into the 'enticement of minors for sexual activity' and seek approval for flights and hotel conference rooms.
EFTA00032495.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York and their supervisors, requesting travel approval for the 'Epstein investigation' (Case 2018R01618, United States v. Epstein). The emails, dating from March to December 2019, detail planned trips to West Palm Beach, Florida, and Los Angeles, California, for the purpose of conducting 'meetings and interviews' and specifically 'interviewing the victims.' The requests consistently reference the nature of the investigation as 'relating to enticement of minors for sexual activity.'
EFTA00032493.pdf
This document is an email thread from March to May 2019 containing travel authorization requests by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) for the 'United States v. Epstein' investigation (Case 2018R01618). The attorney requests approval for multiple trips to West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida, to conduct meetings and interviews with victims regarding the enticement of minors for sexual activity. The emails also discuss logistical details, such as reserving hotel conference rooms for interviews and a personal travel deviation to San Francisco.
EFTA00032491.pdf
This document contains an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding travel approvals for the 'United States v. Epstein' investigation (Case ID 2018R01618). The emails, dated between March and May 2019, detail requests to travel to West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida, specifically to conduct meetings and interview victims related to an investigation into the 'enticement of minors for sexual activity'.
EFTA00031883.pdf
This document contains a thread of internal emails from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) requesting and granting travel approval for prosecutors investigating 'United States v. Epstein' (Case 2018R01618). The requests cover the period from March 2019 through November 2019, detailing trips to West Palm Beach, Florida, and Los Angeles, California, specifically for the purpose of 'interviewing victims' and conducting meetings related to the enticement of minors for sexual activity. The emails confirm active investigation efforts continued through late 2019.
EFTA00030765.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2021 involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the law firm Edwards Pottinger. The correspondence concerns 'Touhy Requests' related to a client identified as '[Redacted] Doe'. Paralegal Maria Kelljchian forwarded an attachment from attorney Brad Edwards to the USANYS. The content of the internal USANYS discussion is largely redacted.
EFTA00030748.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding travel approvals for the 'United States v. Epstein' investigation (Case 2018R01618). The emails span from March to November 2019 and detail multiple trips by an Assistant U.S. Attorney and their team to West Palm Beach, FL, and Los Angeles, CA, for the purpose of interviewing victims and holding meetings. The final email in the chain requests specific commercial JetBlue flights and hotel accommodations in Santa Monica for a trip in November 2019.
EFTA00028673.pdf
This document contains a chain of internal emails from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding travel approval requests for the investigation 'United States v. Epstein' (Case 2018R01618). Assistant U.S. Attorneys request permission to travel to West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on multiple occasions in March, April, and May 2019 to conduct meetings and interview victims. The emails explicitly mention the investigation relates to the 'enticement of minors for sexual activity'.
EFTA00028357.pdf
This document is an email chain involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) requesting administrative approval for travel related to the investigation 'United States v. Epstein' (Case 2018R01618). The emails span from March to July 2019 and detail multiple trips to Florida (Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale) and one trip to Los Angeles for the purpose of conducting victim interviews and meetings. The correspondence highlights the active preparation of the prosecution team leading up to Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
EFTA00028110.pdf
This document contains a series of email correspondence from 2019 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York requesting travel authorization for the 'United States v. Epstein' investigation (Case ID 2018R01618). The emails detail multiple trips planned for West Palm Beach, Florida, and Los Angeles, California, specifically for the purpose of conducting meetings and interviewing victims related to the enticement of minors for sexual activity. The document establishes a timeline of investigative activity occurring in March, April, May, June, and November of 2019.
EFTA00027776.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity