This document is a legal filing, specifically page 3 of a 'Motion to Intervene' in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on August 27, 2019. The filer, identified as the Intervenor/Relator, outlines a timeline of legal actions against the USDOJ and Bill Barr, alleging a conspiracy, fraud, and the monopolization of the judiciary. The filer connects their case to the Jeffrey Epstein case, citing the concept of "prosecutorial discretion" and argues for their right to intervene based on legal precedent where a third party's constitutional rights are implicated.
This document is page 13 of a court order (filed April 16, 2021) in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's rejection of Maxwell's argument regarding the statute of limitations, specifically concerning the 2003 PROTECT Act and retroactive application of laws to past conduct. The legal analysis relies on precedents such as 'Weingarten' and 'Landgraf'.
This document is page 23 (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017737) of a legal text, specifically from the 2005 B.Y.U. Law Review, bearing the name David Schoen. It outlines proposals and rationales for modifying Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 15 and 17 to enhance victims' rights, specifically regarding their right to attend pre-trial depositions and their right to receive notice before their confidential information is subpoenaed.
This document is a media briefing or news digest dated approximately May 15, 2017, bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It summarizes high-profile political news, including the fallout from James Comey's firing, the Russia investigation, and healthcare legislation. Notably, it cites an op-ed by Kenneth Starr (historically associated with Jeffrey Epstein's legal defense) arguing against the appointment of a special prosecutor.
This document is a media monitoring digest dated approximately May 15, 2017. It summarizes various political news items, including Lindsey Graham's call for Trump to release potential tapes of conversations with James Comey, economic data regarding retail sales, and various op-eds. The document likely appears in Epstein-related discovery due to the inclusion of an op-ed headline by Kenneth Starr (Epstein's former lawyer) regarding the appointment of a special prosecutor. The document footer indicates it originates from the House Oversight Committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity