| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The New York Post
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Agent pr |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Rubenstein, 403 F.3d 93, 99 (2d Cir. 2005) | Second Circuit | View |
An email dated June 3, 2008, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach to a colleague. The email discusses a potential conflict of interest or media strategy, noting that Jeffrey Epstein's publicist, Howard Rubenstein, also represents The New York Post, which had recently published an article quoting Epstein's lawyer, Lefcourt.
Legal correspondence from Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, to prosecutor Jeffrey Sloman regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The letter defends Epstein's agents contacting potential witnesses, confirms the plea and sentencing date of January 4, 2008, and insists on Epstein receiving an 18-month sentence with standard Florida state work release privileges ('equal treatment'). Lefkowitz also raises concerns about the government's handling of victim representation under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
This legal document is a page from a court filing in which the Government argues for a sentencing enhancement for a defendant. The Government contends that the defendant's criminal activity was "otherwise extensive" under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a), citing Second Circuit case law to counter the defense's argument that the enhancement requires supervision of a knowing participant.
This document is a faxed printout of a news article describing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney's office regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the police chief's frustration with the lenient plea deal and initial indictment, the involvement of high-profile lawyers like Kenneth Starr, and Epstein's claims of anti-Semitism. The text also describes Epstein's home environment, possession of firearms (Glock), and lists several female associates including Haley Robson and Sarah Kellen.
This document is a faxed printout of a New York Magazine article titled "The Fantasist" by Philip Weiss, published in December 2007, discussing Jeffrey Epstein's indictment for sex crimes. The document contains handwritten instructions to attorneys Lanna Belohlavek and Latosha Lowe to place the item in the Jeffrey Epstein file.
This document is Page 27 of a court filing (Document 670) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on June 22, 2022. It contains legal arguments regarding sentencing guidelines, specifically the 'otherwise extensive' prong of criminal organization. The text cites Second Circuit precedents (*Carrozzella* and *Rubenstein*) to argue that a defendant does not need to supervise another *knowing* participant to qualify for an enhancement, drawing a parallel to a 'right-hand man' scenario involving unknowing participants.
A PageSix.com article from October 6, 2007, reporting on allegations that Jeffrey Epstein secretly financed the launch of MC2 Models, an agency run by Jean-Luc Brunel and Jeffrey Fuller. The article details Epstein's pending plea deal for soliciting minors, as well as past allegations of misconduct against Brunel and associate Gerald Marie involving underage models. Both MC2 president Jeffrey Fuller and Epstein's representative Howard Rubenstein issued denials regarding any business relationship between Epstein and the agency.
This document discusses Jeffrey Epstein's cooperation with federal authorities regarding a Ponzi scheme involving Bear Stearns managers, noting he lost $57 million. It also details his incarceration status, plea agreement terms including house arrest and sex offender registration, and mentions pending civil lawsuits involving allegations of bringing minors to his Palm Beach home.
This document appears to be a compilation of news reports, specifically from the Palm Beach Post in August 2006, detailing the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein and the conflict between his defense team and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter. It outlines a potential plea deal involving 15 months in state prison followed by house arrest, details allegations from a 14-year-old girl regarding sexual abuse in 2005, and mentions recruiter Haley Robson. The text also highlights the defense strategy of discrediting Chief Reiter by attacking his mental stability and bringing up his personal divorce proceedings.
This document contains an excerpt from a Palm Beach Post article dated August 14, 2006, discussing the legal battles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and the conflict between his defense team and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter. It details allegations against Epstein involving minors, his lawyers' attempts to discredit Reiter by calling him a "nutcase" and bringing up his divorce, and Reiter's criticism of State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case.
A printout of a New York Post 'Page Six' article from July 21, 2008. The article reports that three women suing Jeffrey Epstein are asking US District Judge Kenneth Marra to void Epstein's plea deal with the State of Florida, arguing they were not consulted on the non-prosecution agreement. Epstein's representative, Howard Rubenstein, is quoted denying the allegations and claiming the women were not victims.
This document consists of clippings from the Palm Beach Post, primarily from August 14, 2006, detailing the legal troubles of financier Jeffrey Epstein. It covers allegations of sexual assault against minors, a potential federal plea deal, Epstein's indictment on state charges, and the conflict between Epstein's legal team and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, whom they accuse of a personal vendetta.
He has no business relationship with them
Stated that his client, Epstein, would have no comment.
Stated that his client, Epstein, would have no comment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity