Craig

Person
Mentions
46
Relationships
0
Events
6
Documents
22
Also known as:
Craig Horowitz Craig A. Rothfeld

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal case The case of In re Craig, 131 F.3d at 101–02 is cited as an example of the 'Special Circumstances'... Second Circuit View
2011-06-16 N/A Jewish Enrichment Center 2011 Grand Reception Gotham Hall View
2005-10-20 N/A Craig's birthday (approximate date based on 'next week' comment from Oct 13) Unknown (implied location w... View
2005-10-13 N/A Reference to Craig's birthday occurring the following week Unknown View
2005-10-01 N/A Craig's Birthday Unknown (implied location w... View
1994-01-01 N/A Publication of New York Magazine article 'Trump's Near-Death Experience'. New York View

DOJ-OGR-00015144.jpg

This legal document, page 12 of a court filing from August 11, 2025, discusses the rule of secrecy for grand jury matters as established in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). It outlines the specific, narrow exceptions that permit disclosure to government personnel, other grand juries, and law enforcement, or by court order for judicial proceedings and various government investigations. The document then introduces the 'Special Circumstances' Doctrine, developed by the Second Circuit, which allows for disclosure in cases of unusual historical or public interest, citing several precedent cases.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015141.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, details a motion by the Deputy Attorney General to unseal grand jury materials from the Maxwell and Epstein cases. The motion is justified by significant public interest and a directive from the President, following a July 6, 2025, DOJ/FBI memorandum on the Epstein investigation. In response, the court has requested additional information from the government to rule on the motion.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015082.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a submission from the U.S. Government to judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The government discusses legal precedents for grand jury secrecy, notes that Epstein's death is a relevant factor, and details its ongoing efforts to notify all victims before the information is released. The filing is submitted by U.S. Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi, Deputy AG Todd Blanche, and U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015081.jpg

This legal document, dated August 4, 2025, is a letter from the Government to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. It outlines the submission of grand jury materials related to the Epstein and Maxwell cases, including the dates the respective grand juries met. The Government discusses the process of identifying publicly available information from these materials and presents a legal argument that a 'nolle prosequi' in the Epstein case does not prevent the court from disclosing sealed records.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015068.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, discusses whether to release grand jury materials related to Epstein and Maxwell. It argues that the current status of the principals (Epstein deceased, Maxwell incarcerated) and their families should be considered, and notes that much of the information is already public through Maxwell's trial and civil litigation initiated by victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015039.jpg

This legal document, page 3 of a court filing from July 18, 2025, argues for the release of grand jury records related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It cites multiple legal precedents to establish that while grand jury proceedings are traditionally secret, this secrecy is not absolute and can be overridden in 'special circumstances' of significant public and historical interest. The document asserts that the Epstein matter, involving 'the most infamous pedophile in American history,' qualifies as such a circumstance, making the grand jury records 'critical pieces' of national history that should be made public.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000767.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 5, 2025, is a motion arguing for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to the sex-trafficking crimes of Epstein and Maxwell. The filing, made on behalf of victims, asserts that transparency is crucial for justice, public understanding, and holding all responsible parties accountable, citing legal precedent from the Second Circuit. It emphasizes the victims' desire for full disclosure to illuminate the scope of the abuse and identify those who enabled the criminal enterprise.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000764.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding motions to unseal grand jury transcripts. The government discusses legal precedents for maintaining grand jury secrecy and updates the court on its progress in notifying victims, particularly those related to the 'Maxwell and Epstein matters'. The government commits to continuing its efforts to contact all relevant victims and to protect the interests of all third parties involved.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000763.jpg

This document is page 3 of a government filing dated August 4, 2025, addressed to Judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding the Epstein and Maxwell cases. It details specific dates the grand juries met for both cases (2019 for Epstein, 2020-2021 for Maxwell) and discusses the submission of grand jury exhibits and transcripts under seal. The government argues that the 'nolle prosequi' (dismissal due to death) in the Epstein case does not prevent the court from disclosing sealed grand jury minutes.

Legal correspondence / court filing (government letter to judges)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000750.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing from July 29, 2025, argues for the disclosure of grand jury materials. It analyzes legal precedents, noting that while the Government may oppose disclosure, factors like public interest can be overriding. The document states that Defendant Epstein is deceased and cannot assert a position, while Defendant Maxwell intends to respond, and argues that the significant public interest in the crimes of Epstein and Maxwell justifies disclosure.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000748.jpg

This legal document, filed on July 29, 2025, outlines a court order issued on July 22, 2025. The Court has directed the Government to file a legal memorandum and submit extensive materials concerning the grand jury proceedings of Epstein and Maxwell. This includes indices, complete transcripts, proposed redactions, and a statement on whether victims were notified, all in relation to a motion to unseal the grand jury records.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000747.jpg

This legal memorandum is submitted by the Government in response to court orders regarding motions to unseal grand jury transcripts in the cases of Epstein and Maxwell. The Government outlines the legal framework for such a release, citing a 'Circuit split' on the issue and precedent from the Second Circuit, while emphasizing its duty to protect victims. It also references a prior, unsuccessful attempt to unseal similar transcripts related to Epstein in the Southern District of Florida.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000735.jpg

This legal document, page 4 of a court filing, argues for the release of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases due to public interest and diminished privacy concerns following Epstein's death. The Department of Justice commits to redacting victim-identifying information before release. The document is submitted by Pamela J. Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, and Todd Blanche, Deputy Attorney General.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015162.jpg

This document, a legal filing, discusses the strict legal standard for unsealing grand jury testimony, emphasizing that it should only be done in rare, 'exceptional circumstances' to preserve the integrity of grand jury secrecy. It argues against the Government's motion to unseal summary-witness testimony, contending that such an action would undermine the foundations of secrecy and that the redundancy of the testimony with evidence from Maxwell's trial does not justify its release.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015159.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, is a page from a court filing analyzing whether to unseal grand jury testimony related to an individual named Maxwell. The analysis considers several factors, including the potential harm to Maxwell and her family, the fact that much of the information was already revealed during her trial, and the status of witnesses. The document concludes that some factors are neutral while the factor of prior public disclosure is consistent with unsealing.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015142.jpg

This document, filed on August 11, 2025, details the procedural timeline regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts and exhibits in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines communications between the Court, the Government, and Maxwell between July 29 and August 5, 2025, specifically noting Maxwell's opposition to unsealing the transcripts and the Government's efforts to notify victims.

Court filing / legal order narrative
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00031707.jpg

This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page for user 'sublimehottie' (FriendID 20425696), printed on November 8, 2005. It lists musical interests on the left and displays user comments from October 2005 on the right, including messages from 'Beef Knuckles' mentioning a birthday for 'Craig' and 'Mike Chaos' promoting a website. The document is part of a larger DOJ release (DOJ-OGR-00031707) related to a public records request.

Social media printout (myspace profile)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00031330.jpg

This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page for user 'sublimehottie' (associated with Virginia Roberts Giuffre) dated November 8, 2005, released via a DOJ public records request in 2017. The page lists musical interests and displays five comments from friends and acquaintances dated October 2005, discussing personal visits, birthdays, and general greetings. One comment from 'Beef Knuckles' asks if the user is 'gonna be down again' for 'Craig's birthdays'.

Social media printout (myspace profile) / doj public records release
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009282.jpg

This document is a page from an alphabetical index of a court transcript for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. It lists keywords from 'counsels' to 'deliberating' along with the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters and is part of a larger legal file, as indicated by the case and document numbers at the top.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030990.jpg

This document is a printed page (page 10 of 14) from the MySpace profile of user 'sublimehottie', containing comments posted between September 25 and October 18, 2005. Friends and acquaintances, including 'Beef Knuckles' and 'Kelli', leave messages expressing they miss the user, asking about travel plans ('gonna be down again'), and mentioning mutual acquaintances like 'Craig'. The document is part of a Department of Justice public records release (DOJ-OGR-00030990) processed in 2017.

Myspace webpage printout / doj public records release
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018718.jpg

This document, marked with a House Oversight footer, presents a comparison of two magazine covers featuring Donald Trump. The top image is a 1994 New York Magazine cover discussing his financial comeback, while the bottom image is a July 28, 2017 New York Post cover parodying the Trump administration as the reality show 'Survivor'.

Investigative exhibit / media compilation
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029844.jpg

This document is a printed schedule of high-profile social and charitable events in New York City, specifically focusing on dates around June 16, 2011. It lists details for events hosted by the UJA-Federation, UNICEF, RIOULT Dance Company, the New York Building Congress, and the Jewish Enrichment Center. Notable individuals mentioned include former President George H.W. Bush as a speaker and Christine C. Quinn as a guest of honor. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.

Event schedule / digital calendar printout
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity