This document is a page from a legal opinion (cited as 2012 WL 257568) regarding litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It discusses the dismissal of intentional tort claims (assault, battery, IIED), arguments regarding statutes of limitations in New York versus Virginia and Pennsylvania, and equitable tolling due to the clandestine nature of the conspiracy involving al-Qaeda. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406', indicating it was produced as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely included in a production by a financial institution or entity being investigated for connections to high-profile cases, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.
This document is a page from a Table of Authorities, likely from a legal brief or court opinion related to litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (specifically 2012 WL 257568). It lists various legal precedents (case law) alphabetically from 'Abrahams' to 'Chambers', including high-profile cases such as 'Ashcroft v. Iqbal' and several cases involving 'Obama' regarding detainees. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the page itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity