Brooklyn
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00019115.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 5, 2020, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and BOP officials. Sternheim acknowledges that Maxwell is now allowed a water mug and snacks but requests she be moved to an interior cell at MDC Brooklyn due to moisture and cold air degrading her legal paperwork and affecting her health. BOP officials circulate the request internally to schedule a discussion.
EFTA00018845.pdf
This document contains a blank or partially redacted application packet for the New York State Office of Victim Services, revision date September 2015. It includes instructions for victims of crime to claim compensation for expenses such as medical bills, lost wages, and burial costs, as well as a HIPAA release form. The document outlines the legal process for court-ordered restitution and the specific limits of compensation available from the state.
EFTA00018654.pdf
This document is a 'Law360 White Collar' email newsletter from December 5, 2018. It details various legal news stories, including Jeffrey Epstein settling a dispute with an attorney representing his victims to avoid trial testimony. Other stories cover Michael Flynn's cooperation with the Mueller investigation, the Panama Papers indictments, and various fraud and securities cases.
EFTA00015951.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 6-11, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and prison officials (MDC) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell shortly after her arrest. The emails coordinate urgent legal calls between Maxwell and her defense counsel (specifically Mr. Everdell) ahead of court deadlines and her arraignment scheduled for July 14, 2020. There is discussion regarding a 'standing legal call' at 10:00 AM and adherence to EDNY/SDNY protocols for scheduling inmate calls.
EFTA00007253.pdf
This document contains a response from T-Mobile USA to an FBI subpoena dated March 23, 2007, providing subscriber information and call detail records for Jeffrey E. Epstein. The records cover a period from February 2005 to February 2006 and show extensive usage including calls to/from New York, Florida, Ohio, the U.S. Virgin Islands (Charlotte Amalie), and the British Virgin Islands, as well as international communications to Lithuania and Poland. A second subpoena response for a different, redacted account in Brooklyn, NY indicates 'No CALLS' were found for that number.
DOJ-OGR-00022716.tif
This document is an index or keyword list, likely from a larger report or transcript, with terms like 'brother', 'businessman', 'business', 'call', and various other words, each followed by page references. It includes mentions of specific names like Boris and Brad, and locations such as Brazil, Boston, Britain, and Brooklyn. The document's footer indicates it is from 'MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES' and contains a DOJ-OGR number.
DOJ-OGR-00022613.tif
This document is an index or glossary, listing various words and names with corresponding page references. It includes entries such as 'Boris', 'Brad', 'Brazil', 'Boston', 'Britain', 'Brooklyn', and terms related to communication like 'call' and 'called'. The document also features the logo for 'MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES' and a DOJ-OGR document number.
DOJ-OGR-00022461.tif
This document is a transcript of a dialogue, likely from a deposition or interview, involving Todd Blanche, Ghislaine Maxwell, and David Markus. Ghislaine Maxwell discusses taking notes for a meeting, her memory being affected, and her past incarceration in the SHU in Brooklyn for two years where she was on suicide watch. She also mentions that Epstein would not let her meet his clients.
DOJ-OGR-00001802.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues against the defense's position that a co-conspirator committing similar crimes without the defendant constitutes exculpatory evidence under Brady. The Government cites multiple Second Circuit precedents to establish that evidence of a defendant's non-participation in other criminal events or lawful conduct on other occasions is irrelevant to disproving specific charged crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00001347.jpg
This document is a letter dated December 4, 2020, from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter addresses the judge's concerns about Maxwell's safety, detailing her housing assignment, daily access to common areas and legal materials, and her ability to use the commissary. It notes that staff use flashlights for overnight checks and that Maxwell has been instructed on how to use the Administrative Remedy Program for complaints.
DOJ-OGR-00001009.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed April 1, 2021) documenting a videoconference hearing involving Ghislaine Maxwell and her attorney, Mr. Cohen. Ms. Maxwell is participating from the MDC in Brooklyn. The court confirms technical connectivity, establishes protocols for private attorney-client conversations via breakout rooms, and acknowledges receipt of a 'waiver of physical presence' form signed by Maxwell on July 10, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00020597.jpg
This legal document is a letter from attorney John M. Leventhal to a court, dated July 28, 2022. Leventhal requests an extension to file an Appellant's Brief until January 30, 2023. The justification for the request is the necessity of a meeting with his client at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn and his obligations to other clients, including a Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00020596.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 28, 2022, from an appellate counsel at the law firm Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, P.C. to the Clerk of Court. The lawyer, newly assigned to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, requests an extension to file the Appellant's Brief, moving the deadline from October 14, 2022, to January 30, 2023. The justification for the request includes the voluminous nature of the case record (over 3,800 pages of transcripts and 738 docket entries) and the fact that the lawyer has been unable to meet with Maxwell following her recent transfer to a prison in Tallahassee, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00001882.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court transcript from December 10, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The proceeding is conducted via videoconference due to remote access protocols, with Maxwell participating from the MDC in Brooklyn. The Judge establishes technical connectivity and explains the procedure for Maxwell to speak privately with her attorney, Mr. Cohen, in a digital breakout room, before moving to discuss a waiver of physical presence.
DOJ-OGR-00021948.jpg
This document is page 7 of 8 from a court filing (Document 9) dated November 19, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (related to the prosecution of Epstein's guards, Tova Noel and Michael Thomas). It displays a map outlining the jurisdictional boundaries of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Eastern District of New York (EDNY), listing the specific counties included in each district. There are handwritten notes in the bottom right corner that appear to read 'DNO' and 'EDPA'.
DOJ-OGR-00009253.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It captures the direct examination of a witness or juror named Conrad, who is being questioned about lies told to Judge Pauley during jury selection. Conrad admits to falsely stating they lived at their address their "whole life" and that they owned their residence, explaining they did so because they "thought I would seem more juror marketable."
DOJ-OGR-00019791.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from early 2021 (Jan 26 - Feb 4) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details various filings including letters regarding redactions and laptop access at the MDC, and significant defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss multiple counts of the indictment. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders regarding redaction timelines and denied a request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate a previous order.
DOJ-OGR-00009958.jpg
This document is page A-5675 of an index from a legal transcript dated February 15, 2012, related to the court case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' (Case 2:09-cr-00582-ABN). The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'backdating' to 'came' and provides the page and line number references from the full transcript. The document was filed with the court on March 24, 2012.
DOJ-OGR-00009611.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the sufficiency of evidence to uphold a defendant's conviction on multiple counts. It details the defendant's role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation, specifically by making travel arrangements for a victim named Jane and recruiting another victim, Virginia. The document cites trial testimony and legal precedents to assert that a rational jury could and did find the defendant guilty.
DOJ-OGR-00009279.jpg
This document is a word index (concordance) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas'. It was filed as Exhibit A-5675 in the 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) on February 24, 2022. The index lists names and terms appearing in the transcript, including significant mentions of 'Benhamou' (38 times), 'Brune' (48 times), 'Bronx' (43 times), and 'Bronxville' (47 times), along with their specific page and line citations.
DOJ-OGR-00003009.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the admissibility of certain evidence in the case against Epstein. It cites multiple legal precedents establishing that proof of lawful conduct on some occasions is irrelevant to disproving a specific criminal charge. The document applies this to the Epstein case, asserting that a prior investigation's findings about his conduct in the 2000s are irrelevant to the current charges from 1994-1997, and notes that two key victims were only interviewed for the first time in late 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00002833.jpg
This document is page 12 of a court filing (Document 859) dated March 24, 2021, from a criminal case involving a defendant named Schulte (likely Joshua Schulte, though found in a DOJ release). The text outlines the court's rejection of the defendant's arguments regarding venue impropriety, affirming that it is constitutional to indict in one courthouse (White Plains) and try in another (Manhattan) within the same district. The court cites the COVID-19 pandemic delays in Summer 2020 as further justification for the procedural flexibility.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019432.jpg
The document discusses the success of educational programs like LEDA and S.E.O. in helping disadvantaged students access top-tier colleges, highlighting the story of Joshua El-Bey. It contrasts these successes with challenges in the public education system and briefly introduces President Obama's plan to overhaul higher education through federal ratings and innovation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019424.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a report or article submitted to the House Oversight Committee, focusing on the economics of the medical supply chain and hospital billing practices. It uses a case study of a 2012 food poisoning outbreak at a Buddhist monastery in Carmel, N.Y., to illustrate how medical supply distributors (like Cardinal Health) operate and how patients face opaque billing structures, such as a grandmother and toddler billed $1,400 despite having Medicaid coverage. The text highlights the role of group-purchasing organizations and the impact of the Affordable Care Act on hospital consolidations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019378.jpg
This document is a biographical article profiling Jeffrey Epstein (circa 2006), detailing his rise from a blue-collar background to immense wealth and high-society connections. It highlights his relationships with figures like Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Leslie Wexner, his acquisition of lavish properties in New York, Palm Beach, and New Mexico, and his donations to scientific research and political campaigns. The article also alludes to legal controversies, including a SEC probe, a Citibank loan default, and his association with Ponzi schemer Steven Hoffenberg.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity