Arizona Courts

Organization
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017265.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) recounting the legal victory in the Tison v. Arizona death penalty case. The text details correspondence with one of the Tison brothers regarding religion and salvation. A significant footnote describes an unnamed 'sophisticated' client in federal prison who pretended to convert to Judaism weekly to access better food at Shabbat dinners.

Manuscript / book draft (likely alan dershowitz's memoir)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017257.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated 4.2.12) or memoir, likely by Alan Dershowitz (based on the context of the Tison v. Arizona case), produced as part of a House Oversight investigation. The text details the ethical conflict the author faced as the defense attorney for Ricky and Raymond Tison, balancing his duty to his clients against warnings from other anti-capital punishment lawyers that appealing to the Supreme Court could threaten the *Enmund* precedent. The page recounts the decision to file for certiorari and the subsequent anxiety when the Supreme Court granted review, signaling a potential reversal of favorable case law.

Manuscript draft / legal narrative (house oversight production)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014078.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a legal text or law review article (dated 2014) included in a House Oversight Committee production regarding the Epstein investigation. The text analyzes Crime Victims' Rights, specifically contrasting the 'limited definition' of a 'case' advocated by 'the Department' (likely DOJ) against the broader protections found in Arizona and Hawaii state laws. It argues that in these states, victims' rights to notification and consultation attach before formal charges are filed, based on probable cause or arrest.

Legal analysis / law review article (house oversight committee production)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity