This page from a legal document argues that a fact-finder should draw adverse inferences from Jeffrey Epstein's refusal to answer specific deposition questions. It lists several unanswered questions regarding sexual assault allegations, contact with minors (L.M., Jane Doe, E.W.), and claims of fabricated cases by Mr. Edwards, proposing that his silence implies admission of guilt.
This page from a legal filing (page 19) argues that 'Edwards' is entitled to summary judgment because Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment. The document asserts that adverse inferences must be drawn from Epstein's silence, leading to the conclusion that he was a 'serial molester of children' rather than a victim of improper lawsuits. It cites Florida case law to support the argument that silence in civil cases can be used as evidence against a party.
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (likely a Motion for Summary Judgment) arguing that Edwards is entitled to a judgment on Epstein's claim of 'abuse of process.' The text outlines the legal standards for abuse of process in Florida and argues that Epstein's allegations stem merely from dissatisfaction with standard discovery proceedings and motions. It mentions that Edwards has also filed a counterclaim against Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity