| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Poetry in America
|
Project institution |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Launch of online course 'Poetry of the City'. | Online | View |
This document appears to be an excerpt from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' (marked as House Oversight evidence) detailing the aggressive legal defense mounted by Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes a 'year-long assault' on prosecutors by an 'army of legal superstars' including Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr, noting that the defense investigated prosecutors' families to find grounds for disqualification. It chronicles the negotiations leading up to the June 30, 2008 guilty plea, where the prosecution insisted on two years imprisonment and sex offender registration.
This document is page 55 of a House Oversight Committee report (Section 4) containing endnotes referencing Chinese influence in Western academia. It explicitly details financial ties between Chinese billionaires (Wang Jianlin, Pan Shiyi, Zhang Xin) and elite US universities like Harvard and Yale, including a $100 million scholarship fund. The references also cite articles regarding Communist Party influence, the CUSEF, and government pressure on academic institutions.
This document is a printout of a 'Letter to the Editor' written by Alan Dershowitz to The Harvard Crimson, filed as a legal exhibit in Case 1:19-cv-03377. In the letter, Dershowitz vehemently denies Virginia Roberts' sexual misconduct allegations, claiming she lied about him as well as Bill Clinton and the Gores being on Epstein's island. He asserts he has evidence, including emails and a tape recording of Roberts' friend, proving he was framed so Roberts could extract money from Leslie Wexner.
A letter to the editor of The Harvard Crimson written by Alan Dershowitz, dated December 5, 2018. Dershowitz criticizes The Crimson for omitting his defense against Virginia Roberts' accusations, which he characterizes as 'wilfully false' and motivated by financial gain from Leslie Wexner. He asserts that travel, financial, and TV records, reviewed by a former FBI Director, prove he was never present at the locations (Caribbean, New Mexico, etc.) where Roberts claimed to have met him.
The document details Jeffrey Epstein's financial history with Riddell and Leslie Wexner, his brief tenure on the Rockefeller University board, and his $25 million donation to Harvard University. It discusses his social connections, reputation as "arrogant" by board members, and his relationship with biologist Martin Nowak.
This document is a page from the participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011, marked with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it is part of a congressional investigation (likely related to Epstein's network). The list includes high-profile individuals alphabetically from David E. Bloom to Scott Brison, featuring notable figures such as Google co-founder Sergey Brin, musician Bono, and Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger. It details their titles, organizations, and countries of origin.
This document appears to be page 27 of a scientific or philosophical manuscript (possibly a book draft) discussing Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Causal Inference. The text argues that 'Strong AI' requires more than just data processing ('Babylonian data-fitting'); it requires causal models and theoretical understanding ('Athens'). It cites Harvard scientist Gary King and philosopher Stephen Toulmin. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was obtained during an investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research, though Epstein is not explicitly mentioned on this specific page.
This document appears to be a page from a contact list or attendee bio sheet, marked with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017585', suggesting it is part of a congressional investigation. It lists high-profile individuals from finance, technology, politics, and academia, including Henry Kravis (KKR), Garry Kasparov, and Neal Katyal, along with their professional titles and board memberships. The formatting suggests these individuals were people of interest, potential invitees to a conference, or contacts maintained by the subject of the investigation (Epstein).
This document appears to be a biographical profile or press sheet for Quincy Jones, dated roughly to 2008. It details his career achievements (autobiographies, Grammys), upcoming musical projects (Soul Bossa Nostra), and extensive philanthropic work, including 'We Are the World', Jubilee 2000, and the 'Project Q' partnership with the Harvard School of Public Health. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017545', indicating it is evidence within a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to files involving Jeffrey Epstein, though Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.
The narrator reflects on their academic success at Brooklyn College despite earlier discouragement, and their transition from a strictly observant Orthodox Jew to a secular lifestyle in their twenties. The text discusses the personal and professional implications of this choice, including the decision to raise their children free from imposed religious rules, despite the potential career advantages of remaining within the Orthodox community.
This document appears to be a draft page (page 348) from a manuscript, likely an autobiography or legal memoir. The author, inferred to be Alan Dershowitz based on the reference to retiring from Harvard, discusses the theme of 'change' in law, media, and society, and introduces a section on his personal life changes over seven decades.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or essay (likely by Alan Dershowitz given the 'rights come from wrongs' phrasing and House Oversight context) dated April 2, 2012. The text discusses the author's evolving views on affirmative action, noting that while they originally opposed race-based decisions, experience has shown it produced positive results without the feared negative impact on Jewish admissions. The author argues that WASP admissions decreased instead, and concludes that while means may change, the goal of equality remains constant.
This document appears to be page 297 of a draft manuscript or legal text (dated 4.2.12 at the top) produced during a House Oversight investigation. It analyzes the Supreme Court's *Bakke* decision, critiquing Justice Powell's opinion and comparing the affirmative action policies of Harvard College versus UC Davis. The text argues that Harvard's 'holistic' approach, which includes legacy preferences ('genealogy') and vague factors, may be less fair than Davis's explicit quotas, favoring wealthy minority applicants over disadvantaged ones.
This document appears to be a page (292) from a manuscript or book draft, identified by the header '4.2.12' and a word count. It analyzes Justice William O. Douglas's dissenting opinion regarding the equal protection clause and affirmative action, likely in the context of the *DeFunis v. Odegaard* case. The text distinguishes between evaluating applicants based on overcoming individual barriers versus racial quotas, referencing the University of Washington Law School. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document discusses the distinction between the First Amendment right to heckle a speaker versus silencing them entirely, referencing the Bruce Franklin case involving Henry Cabot Lodge at Stanford in 1971. It contrasts the ACLU's past defense of limited disruption with a later refusal by the Southern California branch to apply the same principles during a disruption of Michael Oren's speech at the University of California at Irvine.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated draft 4.2.12) written by an attorney (historically identifiable as Alan Dershowitz) recounting the 'Quincy House Two' case at Harvard. It details the arrest of two students, Stork and Hagen, for screening the film *Deep Throat*, the subsequent protests, and the successful legal defense against District Attorney Droney, who was accused of acting as a censor. The text discusses the irony of censorship attempts and the disparity between legal rulings and public reality regarding obscenity.
This document recounts a controversy at Harvard University involving the Quincy House Film Society's planned screening of the film *Deep Throat*. While initially a campus debate regarding free speech and feminist concerns, the situation escalated when the local District Attorney, John Droney, sought a legal injunction to prevent the showing, prompting the narrator to rush to court to defend the students against prior restraint.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (dated April 2, 2012) of a memoir or autobiography, likely by Alan Dershowitz given the specific biographical details (Harvard professor at 24, Yale Law, Brooklyn background). The text discusses his teaching philosophy of playing 'devil's advocate,' his lack of practical legal experience when first hired, and his transition into First Amendment litigation. It bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a draft of an article or speech written by a long-time Harvard Law professor (likely Alan Dershowitz, based on the '50 years' tenure mentioned and the document source). The text reflects on how the student body has diversified since the 1960s and discusses the increasing globalization of law, using a complex hypothetical case involving multiple jurisdictions to illustrate modern legal challenges. The author concludes by discussing the responsibility of teaching future leaders without propagandizing.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (possibly by Alan Dershowitz himself, given the shift to first-person perspective) discussing his early teaching career at Harvard Law School. It details his Socratic teaching philosophy, the criticism he faced from traditionalists, and the defense and praise he received from figures like Justice Arthur Goldberg and the New York Times Magazine (specifically a 1966 article). The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz given the biographical details) recounting a private conversation with Judge Bazelon. The text discusses the hidden influence J. Edgar Hoover held over liberal Supreme Court Justices, specifically alleging that Justices Goldberg and Marshall cooperated with Hoover's anti-communist agenda to secure their appointments. It further alleges Hoover possessed blackmail material on both men, specifically covering up a relationship between Goldberg and a potential Russian spy.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript, likely by Alan Dershowitz (based on the reference to his book 'The Best Defense'). It outlines thirteen cynical 'Rules of the Justice Game' regarding the conduct of police, judges, and prosecutors, asserting that the system often relies on lying and constitutional violations to convict guilty defendants. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number.
A page from a geopolitical essay or article (bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp) discussing global improvements in health, poverty reduction, and the decline of violence. The text argues against Western pessimism and posits that the Islamic world is compatible with modernization, citing infrastructure projects in Malaysia and Dubai as evidence of modern aspirations.
This email chain from January 2014 details correspondence between Kelly Friendly and Jeffrey Epstein. Friendly thanks Epstein for his generosity, noting that she flew home with 'Mr. Farkas' while her associates Andrew (implied husband) and Caroline remained in St. Thomas using Epstein's car. Epstein offers to arrange a visit to 'the island' for Andrew, and the subject line references Larry Summers, suggesting the conversation originated from a thread regarding him.
An email chain from January 2014 between Kelly Friendly and Jeffrey Epstein regarding logistics in St. Thomas. Friendly thanks Epstein for the use of a car/mini van and mentions flying home with a 'Mr. Farkas,' while others ('Andrew') remain in St. Thomas. Notably, Epstein explicitly identifies 'Cecile' as 'the governors wife and my asst' when coordinating the vehicle.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity