US Court of Appeals
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
EFTA00028441.pdf
This document is an email thread from August 2, 2019, discussing a court opinion released that day related to Jeffrey Epstein's bail. The correspondents share a link to a US Court of Appeals document, noting that the opinion involves 'slapping down' a redacted individual.
EFTA00023748.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 regarding the filing of legal documents in the case US v. Maxwell (Case No. 20-3061). Nicole Simmons of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. sent an unredacted opening brief and sealed appendix to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ('newcases@ca2.uscourts.gov') at the request of Adam Mueller. The email was subsequently forwarded to personnel at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00022349.pdf
This document is an email chain from July and August 2019 involving attorney Jonathan M. Albano (representing Oath Inc.) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns 'US v. Gatto' and a motion by Oath Inc. to intervene to obtain materials. Albano specifically requests to file the Second Circuit's July 3, 2019 decision in 'Brown v. Maxwell' (a case involving unsealing documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein) as supplemental authority, linking the legal standards of public access between the two cases.
EFTA00019849.pdf
An email dated September 23, 2020, from Nicole Simmons of HMF Law (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman) to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The email submits an unredacted version of a legal filing regarding the consolidation of cases related to Ghislaine Maxwell (Civil case 20-2413 and Criminal case 20-3061).
DOJ-OGR-00000913.jpg
This document is a page from Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for pretrial release, dated April 1, 2021. It details her complaints regarding harsh detention conditions, including sleep deprivation, intrusive searches, and isolation, which she argues prevent her from effectively preparing for trial. It also highlights logistical difficulties in reviewing 2.5 million pages of discovery material on a limited computer via video link with her attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00000905.jpg
This document is a notice from the court regarding Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021. It informs counsel Christian R. Everdell that a filing was defective because a motion to be relieved is required for substitution of counsel. The document sets a deadline of April 5, 2021, to cure the defect to avoid the document being stricken or the appeal dismissed.
DOJ-OGR-00000900.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-770) covering March 22–24, 2021. It details the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail by Judge Alison J. Nathan and Maxwell's subsequent notice of appeal. Additionally, it contains a significant order regarding a defense subpoena directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, outlining the procedural requirements for victim notification and privacy protection under Rule 17(c)(3).
DOJ-OGR-00000895.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 and early 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's bail application due to flight risk, citing specific charges including conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. The docket tracks correspondence between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Everdell), sealed documents, and Maxwell's subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal after a request for an extension of time was denied.
DOJ-OGR-00000889.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings from September to November 2020. It chronicles a series of letters, motions, and orders between the prosecution (USA, represented by AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and the defense (Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorneys including Sternheim, Everdell, and Pagliuca), all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings primarily concern procedural matters such as requests to delay disclosure of evidence, modify protective orders, and confirm the government's disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000862.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 covering the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail and her subsequent appeal of that decision. It also details a legal dispute regarding a defense subpoena targeting a law firm representing alleged victims, with Judge Nathan ordering the firm to formally file objections to protect victim privacy under Rule 17(c)(3). The document lists various filings including letters from prosecutors (AUSAs) and defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000857.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering late December 2020 to mid-January 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail due to flight risk, referencing charges related to the enticement and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts. The document tracks subsequent procedural filings, including sealed documents and Maxwell's eventual filing of a Notice of Appeal on January 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000825.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 19-2221, detailing legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein between July 16 and July 23, 2019. Key events include the filing of letters by Epstein's attorneys regarding bail, the appearance of several new attorneys, a bond hearing on July 18 where bail was denied by Judge Richard M. Berman, and the subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal by Epstein. The document lists all parties present at the hearing, including prosecutors, defense attorneys, and law enforcement agents.
DOJ-OGR-00020578.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet detailing the sentencing and subsequent appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June and early July 2022. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan sentencing Maxwell to 240 months in prison, recommending placement at FCI Danbury, and imposing a $750,000 fine. The document also logs Maxwell's immediate filing of a Notice of Appeal following the judgment.
DOJ-OGR-00020512.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's order regarding the handling of subpoenas involving alleged victims, specifically requiring a law firm (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) to coordinate with defense counsel on redactions and objections. The docket also records Maxwell's Notice of Appeal, the filing of several sealed documents, and the formal appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley on behalf of the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020507.jpg
This document is a legal docket sheet from Case 22-1426, detailing court filings and orders related to Ghislaine Maxwell between December 31, 2020, and January 25, 2021. The entries show her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, filing motions for extensions and laptop access, Judge Alison J. Nathan ruling on these motions, and the filing of a notice of appeal. A key point of contention arises when the Bureau of Prisons requests the court to vacate an order that granted Maxwell laptop access for discovery review.
DOJ-OGR-00020500.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from August 25, 2020, to October 6, 2020. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests regarding victim identities, prison conditions, and modifications to a protective order. The docket also records Maxwell's subsequent appeal, the sealing of various documents, and the appearance of new defense counsel Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00020406.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet covering late 2020 to early 2021 regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details procedural motions filed by her attorney, Christian Everdell, including requests for extensions and a Notice of Appeal to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. Notably, it documents a conflict between the court and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) regarding an order granting Maxwell access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review discovery materials, which the BOP subsequently requested to be vacated.
DOJ-OGR-00020399.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 22-1426) detailing legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell between August 25, 2020, and October 6, 2020. It lists various filings including memorandum opinions denying defense motions, letters regarding protective orders, a notice of appeal, sealed documents, and an attorney appearance by Bobbi C. Sternheim. The entries record actions taken by Judge Alison J. Nathan, the defense, and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00020386.jpg
This document is the second page of a procedural instruction sheet from a US Court of Appeals (likely the Second Circuit) dated July 8, 2022. It outlines requirements for attorneys and pro se parties to update contact information via PACER or letter, explains rules for case captions under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP), and provides instructions for appellate designations.
DOJ-OGR-00021684.jpg
Page 24 (PDF page 37) of a legal brief in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Maxwell appeal). The text argues against Maxwell's claim that Eleventh Circuit law should apply to the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), asserting that the court should follow its own precedents (Annabi) and that the governing law is that of the forum state. It cites multiple cases to support the application of local circuit law over the law where a plea agreement was originally negotiated.
DOJ-OGR-00019471.jpg
This document is a PACER transaction receipt and a partial court docket sheet generated on September 18, 2020. It details legal proceedings regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), specifically focusing on the transmission of an appeal to the US Court of Appeals and the placement of two sealed documents into a vault on September 10, 2020. The receipt indicates a user (amuell01) accessed the docket report under the client code 'Maxwell Criminal'.
DOJ-OGR-00019275.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from August and September 2020 detailing proceedings in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the denial of defense motions seeking the disclosure of victim identities, Maxwell's release into the general prison population, and modifications to a protective order to allow the use of discovery materials in civil cases. The document concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals regarding the denial of the protective order modification.
DOJ-OGR-00019257.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Page 19 of 19) from September 2020 detailing procedural events in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests to be released into the general prison population, to obtain victim identities immediately, and to modify a protective order to use discovery materials in civil cases. The document concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal regarding these denials and the transmission of the record to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
DOJ-OGR-00019818.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Page 23 of 24) from 'Case 21-58' covering entries from March 22 to March 24, 2021. It details the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail by Judge Alison J. Nathan and Maxwell's subsequent notice of appeal. Additionally, it contains a detailed order regarding a defense subpoena directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, requiring the firm to file objections on the public docket.
DOJ-OGR-00019813.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from late December 2020 to January 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's bail application due to flight risk, the listing of her indictment charges (sex trafficking, conspiracy, perjury), and procedural motions regarding extensions of time and the filing of a Notice of Appeal. The document records rulings by Judge Alison J. Nathan and correspondence from both the prosecution (USA) and Maxwell's defense counsel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity