Kurt Gödel
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Hilbert
|
Academic professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Albert Einstein
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Hilbert
|
Academic historical adversary |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Hilbert
|
Academic professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
J.R. Lucas
|
Academic analysis |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Hilbert's reaction to Gödel's proof where he stopped working on formalism. | Unknown | View |
| 1931-01-01 | N/A | Kurt Gödel proved incompleteness theorems regarding mathematical systems. | University of Vienna | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016929.jpg
This document appears to be page 126 of a larger manuscript or book included in the House Oversight Committee's investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016929). The text is academic in nature, discussing the history of cybernetics, 'Ashby's Law,' and the philosophical implications of control systems and artificial intelligence, referencing historical figures like Norbert Wiener and Alan Turing. While part of an Epstein-related document dump, this specific page contains philosophical theory rather than direct evidence of transactions or communications.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015685.jpg
This document is a single page (Preface, page xi) from a book, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp (015685). The text is a philosophical discussion by an engineer-author regarding artificial intelligence, consciousness, and free will, referencing works by Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, and Daniel Dennett. The author argues against determinism and computational theories of mind, citing Andrew Wiles' 1996 proof of Fermat's Last Theorem as evidence of non-algorithmic human creativity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015937.jpg
This document appears to be a page (p. 247) from a book or scientific paper discussing theoretical computer science and mathematics. It covers Gödel's incompleteness theorem, Turing's proofs regarding algorithms, and the concept of a 'logic limit' in computing. The document is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015937', indicating it was produced as evidence during a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to Epstein's connections to the scientific community or funding.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015936.jpg
This document is page 246 from a book or paper (possibly titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?') included in a House Oversight investigation file (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015936). The text discusses computer science and philosophical concepts, specifically the Halting Problem, Universal Turing Machines, and Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems, referencing Roger Penrose and Stephen Wolfram. It argues that if a Halting procedure existed, it would imply a deterministic universe without free will.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015911.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a biography or history book discussing Alan Turing's development of the theoretical 'Turing Machine' in the mid-1930s. It details his inspiration derived from Gödel's incompleteness theorems and his visualization of a machine using paper tape to compute mathematical problems. The page bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015911', indicating it was included in a document production by the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015896.jpg
This document is page 206 from a book or paper titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'. The text discusses the philosophy of mind, specifically the arguments of Lucas and Penrose regarding Gödel's incompleteness theorems and whether human thought is limited by formal systems like machines are. It features a photograph of Albert Einstein and Kurt Gödel walking together, captioned 'Two Giants'. The document bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015896', indicating it was part of a production to the US House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's connections with the scientific community.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015895.jpg
This document appears to be page 205 from a book titled 'Known Unknowns' or a similar academic text, stamped with a House Oversight footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015895). The text discusses mathematical inconsistency, the Peano axioms, and the implications of equating numbers (like 0 and 1) on logic systems. It introduces 'The Lucas Argument' regarding J.R. Lucas, Gödel's theorem, and Roger Penrose's later work arguing that the human mind functions outside formal rules, challenging Strong AI.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015894.jpg
This document appears to be page 204 from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', which has been included in a House Oversight Committee investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015894). The text is a philosophical and mathematical discussion regarding Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems, the liar's paradox, and the concept of inconsistency in mathematical models. It details David Hilbert's angry reaction to Gödel's work and discusses the implications of these theorems on human creativity and knowledge discovery.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015893.jpg
This document is a scanned page (page 203) from a book titled 'Known Unknowns' included in a House Oversight file. The text explains mathematical logic, specifically focusing on Kurt Gödel's method of using prime numbers and coding schemes (Gödel numbering) to represent proofs as single numbers. It appears to be an educational or popular science text rather than a direct communication or transaction record.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015892.jpg
This document is a scanned page (202) from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' included in House Oversight files (Bates stamp 015892). The text discusses mathematical history, specifically the Seven Bridges of Königsberg problem solved by Euler in 1735 and Kurt Gödel's 1931 incompleteness theorems. It uses an analogy involving the London Marathon to explain Gödel's proof that true statements exist which cannot be proven within their own system.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015891.jpg
This document appears to be page 201 from a book or manuscript titled 'Known Unknowns' included in the House Oversight Epstein document production. The text discusses mathematical logic, formal systems, and symbols, using analogies involving sports (marathon, tennis) and an Amazonian tribe to explain the relationship between rules and meaning. It concludes by referencing the mathematician Hilbert and stating he was proven wrong by Kurt Gödel regarding the nature of mathematical truth.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016100.jpg
This document is page 410 from a book index, stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016100', indicating it is part of an evidence collection by the House Oversight Committee (likely related to investigations involving Epstein/Maxwell and their connections to academia/science). The index lists various scientific, philosophical, and cultural terms and figures, including 'Bill Gates', 'Stephen Hawking', 'Harvard University', and 'Google'. The running header is 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016093.jpg
This document is page 403 of a larger manuscript, titled 'Index of Theorems.' It lists various scientific, mathematical, and philosophical theorems and hypotheses organized into sections including 'Known Unknowns,' 'Turing's Machines,' 'Software,' 'Hyper-Computing,' 'Hyper-Communication,' and 'Creativity.' The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016093,' indicating it was produced as evidence during a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to scientific funding or institutions connected to the investigation (potentially involving Epstein's ties to the scientific community/MIT Media Lab). It references Hava Siegelmann regarding Neural Networks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016079.jpg
This document is page 389 of a bibliography from a book, likely related to mathematics, logic, physics, music, or consciousness studies, given the titles listed (e.g., 'Gödel’s Theorem', 'Musicophilia', 'The Emperor’s New Mind'). It lists citations for works by prominent scientists and thinkers such as Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, Oliver Sacks, and Alan Turing. The page includes a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence for a congressional investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity