Bruno Moore
PersonRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00003049.jpg
This document is page 115 of a legal filing (Document 204) from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. It outlines legal arguments regarding the 'good faith exception' to the exclusionary rule, citing precedents like United States v. Leon and United States v. Moore. The text argues that suppression of evidence is not warranted because the Government acted in good faith by obtaining a grand jury subpoena and applying to the court to modify a civil protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00002953.jpg
This document is page 19 of 239 from Document 204 filed on April 16, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It is a Table of Authorities page (numbered xviii) listing legal precedents cited in the filing, specifically cases beginning with 'United States v.' followed by names starting with M through N. It contains standard legal citations and page references for the brief.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016959.jpg
A page from a scientific text (likely a book or academic article) discussing Artificial Intelligence, specifically comparing 'bottom-up' vs. 'top-down' machine learning approaches. It contrasts AI learning with human child development, citing experiments with a 'blicket detector.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of materials gathered during a congressional investigation, possibly related to Epstein's scientific interests or connections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021797.jpg
This document contains the text of two Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The editorials criticize Epstein's legal maneuvering, the delayed justice for his solicitation charges involving underage girls, and the aggressive tactics of his high-profile legal defense team.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021777.jpg
This document is a text of a Palm Beach Post editorial from February 13, 2008, criticizing State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It argues that the prosecution was too lenient, influenced by Epstein's defense team (including Alan Dershowitz), and failed to pursue stronger charges despite significant evidence collected by police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021766.jpg
This document is a reprint of a Palm Beach Post editorial dated August 10, 2006, titled 'Massaging the system.' It heavily criticizes State Attorney Barry Krischer for referring the Jeffrey Epstein case to a grand jury rather than prosecuting directly, suggesting favoritism toward the wealthy defendant. The text details police findings, including payments to minors and physical evidence (school transcripts) found in Epstein's trash that contradicted his defense claims of ignorance regarding the victims' ages.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030302.jpg
This document contains two Palm Beach Post editorials from 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein's legal troubles. The first, from February 13, criticizes the lack of consequences for Epstein despite a 2006 indictment and details his high-profile legal team's efforts to dismiss allegations. The second editorial, from July 7, reports that Epstein finally admitted to luring a teenage girl and began serving an 18-month jail sentence as part of a plea deal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity