Trove
Sign In Sign Up

William O’Donohue

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
2
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
O’Donohue
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Natalie Bennett
Professional
6
2
View
person Larry Laudan
Academic citation
5
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00005635.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing from October 29, 2021, argues against the admissibility of expert opinions from a treatment provider named Rocchio. The filing contends that Rocchio's opinions on grooming are based solely on personal experience, lack a reliable methodology, and are not supported by scientific literature. It cites various legal precedents and an academic article to assert that her testimony fails to meet the standards for expert witnesses.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005630.jpg

This legal document is a motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on October 29, 2021, to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio. The motion argues that Dr. Rocchio's opinions on "grooming" are subjective, not based on verifiable scientific methods, and therefore inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. The defense claims her testimony is an attempt by the government to use a "blind" expert to improperly vouch for the accusers' truthfulness.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005628.jpg

This document is page 4 of a legal filing from October 29, 2021, specifically a table of authorities. It lists legal cases (United States v. Serna, Wehling v. Sandoz Pharms. Corp.), a scholarly article on child sexual abuse, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The page indicates the legal precedents and rules that are cited within the larger document.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005871.jpg

This document is page 4 of an exhibit filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains an excerpt from an academic or clinical paper titled 'Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse,' discussing the difficulties in scientifically and legally defining 'grooming.' The text argues for a clearer conceptual definition to improve forensic and clinical application, citing philosopher Larry Laudan and researcher O'Donohue.

Court filing exhibit (academic article)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search