This document is an email chain from July 5, 2019, initiated by attorney Bruce Barket regarding his client 'Nick' (likely Nicholas Tartaglione) at the MCC. Barket complains that Nick was placed in the SHU following a cellphone allegation, describes poor sanitary conditions (leaking toilet), and urgently requests the return of seized privileged legal documents. Assistant U.S. Attorneys and staff attorneys discuss scheduling a call for the following Monday to address the SHU conditions and the cellphone issue.
This document is an email chain involving Bruce Barket (attorney for Nicholas Tartaglione, referred to as 'Nick') and staff at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). Barket complains that his client was placed in the SHU due to an alleged cell phone possession, citing poor conditions (leaking toilet) and the seizure of privileged legal documents. The government attorneys correspond to schedule a call to discuss the SHU conditions and the cell phone issue. This correspondence occurs in July 2019, shortly before/during the time Jeffrey Epstein was incarcerated at MCC.
An email thread from September 2019 between defense attorneys (Bruce Barket and Tony Ricco) and Assistant U.S. Attorneys regarding scheduling a meeting to discuss legal proceedings. Tony Ricco mentions submitting a schedule for 'penalty phase pleadings' in compliance with ABA Guidelines. The group attempts to coordinate a meeting time for the following week, likely Thursday or Friday.
This document is an email dated September 20, 2019, from attorney Bruce A. Barket to redacted recipients, copied to Tony Ricco and Michael Bachrach. The email discusses setting up a meeting to propose a briefing schedule, aiming to finalize their schedule by the following Tuesday. The document includes a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer and Bates number EFTA00021330.
This document is an email chain from September 20-21, 2019, primarily involving attorney Bruce Barket of Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP, and an Assistant United States Attorney. The discussion concerns scheduling a meeting to propose a briefing schedule. The AUSA suggests meeting 'next Friday' to allow time for internal discussion and conferring with a redacted party.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity