Labor Department
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Acosta
|
Employment |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00030182.pdf
An email dated July 10, 2019, sent by an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email circulates a quote and link from a Daily Beast article in which Alexander Acosta claims he was told to back off the Epstein case because Epstein 'belonged to intelligence' and was 'above his pay grade.'
DOJ-OGR-00000164.tif
This document excerpt details key events in the Jeffrey Epstein case, including his arrest on July 6, 2019, his detention in the Metropolitan Correctional Center, and his death on August 10, 2019. It also covers the controversy surrounding Acosta's handling of the Epstein investigation, leading to his resignation as Secretary of Labor on July 12, 2019, following media and Congressional scrutiny.
DOJ-OGR-00021181.jpg
This legal document outlines the events following Jeffrey Epstein's death on August 10, 2019, including the dismissal of his federal indictment in New York and the progression of a Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) lawsuit in Florida. It details a specific victim's appeal and the government's arguments. The document also describes the initiation of an investigation by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) into potential prosecutorial misconduct, prompted by a Miami Herald report and a formal request from Senator Ben Sasse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022991.jpg
This document is a page from a news report (archived by the House Oversight Committee) discussing the connections between Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Alex Acosta. It highlights a 2002 quote from Trump praising Epstein and noting his interest in 'younger' women, which attorney Spencer Kuvin finds suspicious given Epstein's later convictions. The text also details Alex Acosta's defense of the lenient plea deal he arranged for Epstein while serving as U.S. Attorney, a topic raised during Acosta's confirmation hearings for Labor Secretary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021756.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a news article (likely the Miami Herald) presented as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. It details the 2008 plea deal negotiations and sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting a specific quote from prosecutor Villafaña about hiding other crimes and co-conspirators from the judge. It also documents false statements made in court regarding victim notification and includes comments from victims' attorney Bradley Edwards suggesting higher-ups directed the prosecutors' actions. The document includes a footer with contact details for Epstein's lawyer, Darren K. Indyke.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021748.jpg
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke in 2019 (based on copyright), containing the text of a news article or report reviewing the 2008 sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the courtroom exchange where prosecutor Belohlavek misled Judge Pucillo about victim notification and agreement with the plea deal. It also references Alex Acosta's defense of the deal, the Labor Department's statement, and attorney Bradley Edwards' assertion that prosecutor Villafaña was directed by superiors to keep victims uninformed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021738.jpg
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke (likely in 2019) containing the text of a news article reviewing the 2008 plea deal of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the failure to inform victims about the plea agreement, citing court transcripts between Judge Pucillo and prosecutor Belohlavek, and includes comments from victim attorney Bradley Edwards suggesting prosecutors were directed by superiors to settle. The document includes Indyke's signature block with contact details redacted and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022288.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register where the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) responds to public comments on a proposed rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Board refutes claims that employees are already aware of their rights or that posted notices are ineffective, citing comments that demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of the NLRA by both employers and employees. The Board argues that physical and electronic postings are a necessary and direct way to inform the workforce, even if not every employee reads them.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity