Bert
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jay
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00013632.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2007 between likely government prosecutors or officials discussing the Jeffrey Epstein case. The conversation covers the selection of a 'Special Master' (discussing candidates 'Bert' and 'Mr. Ocariz'), communications with Epstein's defense attorney 'Jay' (Lefkowitz) and the firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails also detail a request for a 'de novo review' of evidence for a proposed indictment, specifically asking for FBI '302s' and state Grand Jury transcripts.
EFTA00013543.pdf
This document is a chain of internal emails from December 2007, likely among prosecutors, discussing strategy in the Epstein case. Key topics include a request for a 'de novo review' of evidence (including FBI 302s and Grand Jury transcripts) following correspondence from Epstein's defense firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails also discuss the selection process for a 'Special Master' or similar role, debating candidates named Bert and Mr. Ocariz, and mention drafting a letter to Jay Lefkowitz.
EFTA00010507.pdf
This document is a court opinion and order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States. The court ruled that the government violated the Petitioners' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with them before entering into a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The court granted partial summary judgment for the Petitioners regarding the CVRA violation and denied the government's cross-motion, while deferring the issue of remedy to a later date.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity