Witness
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Alleged sexual conduct |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sender (AUSA)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Large family event hosted by Ghislaine and her husband | Unknown | View |
EFTA00010220.pdf
An email dated November 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding a travel request for a trial witness. The witness requested a hotel room on a higher floor to facilitate remote work due to his redacted profession.
DOJ-OGR-00017125.jpg
This document is a page from the closing arguments (summation) of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The text focuses on attacking the credibility of a witness by highlighting a major inconsistency between her court testimony (claiming abuse started in a Florida pool house) and a December 2019 FBI interview (claiming abuse started at age 14 in New York during a headshot session). Menninger references expert testimony from Dr. Loftus regarding memory and trauma to suggest the witness's story is unreliable.
DOJ-OGR-00013285.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, where the Court discusses a proposed limiting instruction for the jury. The instruction clarifies that testimony from a witness about alleged sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein in New Mexico is not considered 'illegal sexual activity' as charged by the government in the indictment. The Court also references a prior November 23rd conference where the defense agreed with the instruction, and notes complications related to New Mexico law.
DOJ-OGR-00014513.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The attorney attacks the credibility of a witness (likely 'Jane' or Carolyn) by highlighting inconsistencies in her statements to the FBI regarding her housing (Bear Lake Estates), her age when moving to Interlochen, and the timeline of meeting Donald Trump in a green car owned by Epstein. The defense argues the witness fabricated Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement at the suggestion of her personal injury lawyer, Mr. Glassman.
Invoking the Fifth
Counsel for a witness indicated the witness intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity