CEOS Trial Attorney

Person

Mentions

10

Relationships

6

Events

9

Documents

5

Search

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

6 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person Villafaña	Professional	5	1	View
person Villafaña	Collaborated with	1	1	View
person Epstein	Involved in prosecution assessment	1	1	View
person Oosterbaan	Subordinate instructed by	1	1	View
person Oosterbaan	Supervisory	1	1	View
person Villafaña	Collaborator	1	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	Meeting	A CEOS Trial Attorney met with Villafaña to discuss the case and interview victims.	Florida	View
N/A	Interview	Villafaña and another CEOS Trial Attorney interviewed three of Epstein's victims. One broke down ...	Florida	View
N/A	Meeting	The CEOS Trial Attorney had meetings with some of the victims after the NPA was signed.	N/A	View
2008-02-21	N/A	CEOS Trial Attorney met with victims	Unknown	View
2008-02-01	Interview	At least one more victim was interviewed the day after the January 31 interviews. Two additional ...	N/A	View
2008-01-31	Interview	FBI agents, Villafaña, and the CEOS Trial Attorney interviewed three victims, including Courtney ...	N/A	View
2008-01-18	N/A	CEOS assigned a Trial Attorney to the Epstein case.	Washington, D.C.	View
2008-01-01	Investigation	Villafaña and the CEOS Trial Attorney participated in victim interviews.	N/A	View
2008-01-01	N/A	Villafaña and CEOS Trial Attorney prepared to participate (in further case proceedings).	N/A	View

DOJ-OGR-00023262.tif

This document details the efforts of FBI agent Villafaña, the FBI, and a CEOS Trial Attorney in organizing the case against Epstein and interviewing victims between January and May 2008. It describes an attorney's attempt to file civil litigation against Epstein and the reporting of a $50 million civil suit and an anticipated plea deal by the New York Post. The document also notes that the FBI and prosecutors interviewed additional victims and that an FBI report indicates a victim's belief that Epstein should be prosecuted.

Report excerpt

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021347.jpg

This legal document details internal discussions and challenges within the prosecution team handling the Jeffrey Epstein case. It reveals concerns among prosecutors like Acosta, Lourie, and Sloman regarding victim testimony, legal weaknesses, and setting unfavorable federal precedent, contrasting with Villafaña's proposed charges. The document highlights the complexity of the case, including victims' reluctance to testify, credibility issues raised by the defense, and the influence of Acosta's past role in the Civil Rights Division on his legal strategy.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021303.jpg

This page from a DOJ OPR report details the internal Department review between February and June 2008 regarding the Epstein case. It highlights that while Epstein's defense sought a broad review of misconduct and NPA terms, the DOJ only reviewed federal jurisdiction issues. The document also records a 'stand down' order where Oosterbaan instructed a CEOS attorney to cease involvement, and details the formal notification sent by the USAO to the Civil Rights Division classifying the case as 'child prostitution' rather than a matter of 'national interest.'

Government report (department of justice/opr report)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021197.jpg

This document is a table of contents from a legal filing, outlining a timeline of events from September 2007 to June 2008 related to the federal investigation of Epstein. It details the actions of the USAO, FBI, defense attorneys, and individuals like Acosta and Villafaña concerning a non-prosecution agreement (NPA), victim notification procedures, and Epstein's eventual state guilty plea on June 30, 2008. The document highlights the complex legal maneuvering and ongoing investigative efforts by both the prosecution and defense during this critical period.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00004598.jpg

This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal decision-making process regarding the notification of victims in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights that prosecutors (Villafaña, Acosta) deliberately chose not to inform victims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) or their rights to damages, citing concerns that doing so would compromise the victims' credibility as witnesses and give the appearance of financial motivation. The document specifically references interviews with victim Courtney Wild and others in early 2008 where the existence of the signed NPA was withheld.

Doj/opr report (office of professional responsibility report filed as court exhibit)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

0

As Recipient

1

Total

1

Cease involvement

From: Oosterbaan

To: CEOS Trial Attorney

Instructed attorney to cease involvement in the case.

Instruction

N/A

Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity