Heritage Education Trust
OrganizationRelationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017930.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 Federal Court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It details the dismissal of civil RICO and ATA complaints against several SAAR Network executives (Al-Awani, Ashrafs, Mirza, Unus) due to lack of specific allegations connecting them to al Qaeda support. However, the court denied the motion to dismiss for Jamal Barzinji regarding material support claims, citing his control over bank accounts and alleged financial transfers to al Qaeda, while dismissing the RICO claim against him. It also briefly mentions a motion for reconsideration by NCB (National Commercial Bank).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929.jpg
A Westlaw printout of a 2005 legal opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929. The text detailed the court's decision to dismiss complaints against various entities (including Mar-Jac Poultry, IIIT, and African Muslim Agency) alleged to be part of the 'SAAR Network' and accused of funding al Qaeda or Islamic Jihad. The court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to provide specific factual grounds that these entities knew their donations were funding terrorism. There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in the text of this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017928.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (392 F.Supp.2d 539) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details rulings on motions to dismiss for various defendants including the Success Foundation (dismissed), Wa'el Jalaidan (denied), IIRO (denied), Rabita Trust (denied), and the SAAR Network. It discusses allegations of financial support for al Qaeda and corporate structures involving entities in Herndon, Virginia. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry, potentially related to financial oversight, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly mentioned on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017913.jpg
This document is a court opinion and order from the Southern District of New York regarding the multi-district litigation 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' Judge Casey addresses motions to dismiss filed by various defendants, including Saudi Princes (Salman and Naif), the Saudi High Commission, and various entities labeled as the 'SAAR Network' and Islamic charities, primarily arguing lack of jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The document lists numerous defense attorneys and specific defendants accused of being material sponsors of terror.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017887.jpg
This document is page 822 from a Federal Supplement court opinion (House Oversight record) regarding 9/11-related lawsuits (Ashton and Burnett complaints). The court dismissed complaints against individuals Tariq, Omar, and Bakr Binladin for lack of jurisdiction but denied the motion to dismiss for the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), citing the need for discovery regarding SBG's potential ties to al-Qaeda and operations in Maryland. The document also outlines allegations against the 'SAAR Network,' described as a web of charities allegedly established to fund terrorist organizations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017846.jpg
This document is page 781 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York concerning 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details procedural history, specifically oral arguments heard in October 2004 regarding motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi banking, corporate, and individual defendants (including the Binladin Group and Al Rajhi Bank) based on lack of jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry, though no direct textual link to Jeffrey Epstein appears on this specific page.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity