Circuit Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
014.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on March 12, 2010, by attorney Tama Beth Kudman on behalf of non-party witness Jean Luc Bruhnel (likely Jean-Luc Brunel) in the civil case Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Bruhnel opposes the plaintiff's motion to compel his deposition, arguing that he is a French citizen who has left the United States and cannot be legally compelled to return for testimony. The filing claims the plaintiff's motion is frivolous, notes that previous deposition dates were canceled by agreement, and suggests the plaintiff should use the Hague Convention to secure testimony abroad.
010-15.pdf
This document is a press release and joint statement dated April 8, 2016, announcing the settlement of a defamation lawsuit between Professor Alan Dershowitz and attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys acknowledged it was a mistake to have filed sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz on behalf of their client, Virginia Roberts, and withdrew those claims. Dershowitz withdrew his counterclaims regarding unethical conduct and reiterated his denial of the allegations, citing travel records as evidence of his absence during the alleged events.
075.pdf
A legal response filed on March 12, 2010, by attorney Tama Beth Kudman on behalf of non-party Jean Luc Bruhnel (spelled 'Bruhnel' in document) in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. The filing opposes a motion to compel Bruhnel's deposition, arguing that he is a French citizen who has left the U.S. with no plans to return and cannot be compelled to appear under Federal Rules. The document alleges misrepresentation and nonfeasance by the Plaintiff's counsel and suggests using the Hague Convention to secure testimony abroad.
027.pdf
Legal response filed on March 12, 2010, by attorney Tama Beth Kudman on behalf of non-party witness Jean Luc Bruhnel (spelled Bruhnel in document). The filing opposes Plaintiff Jane Doe's motion to compel Bruhnel to appear for a deposition, arguing that Bruhnel is a French citizen who has left the US with no plans to return and cannot be compelled by the Court to return. The document asserts that the Plaintiff should use the Hague Convention or other international mechanisms to secure testimony abroad and accuses Plaintiff's counsel of misrepresentation and failure to follow proper procedure.
EFTA00027562.pdf
A LexisNexis docket report for the US Court of Appeals case 21-58, United States of America v. Maxwell, retrieved on April 14, 2021. The document lists proceedings from April 9 to April 13, 2021, including notices of appearance for Ghislaine Maxwell and motions to seal documents filed by the United States government (Appellee), which were subsequently granted.
EFTA00027560.pdf
A LexisNexis court docket report for the US Circuit Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Case No. 21-58), retrieved on March 31, 2021. The document lists procedural filings from late March 2021, including a Notice of Criminal Appeal, the consolidation of cases 21-58 and 21-770, and notices of appearance for counsel representing both the USA and Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00000805.jpg
This document is page 22 of a court filing (Document 32) from July 18, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein. The text details the Court's finding that Epstein is a 'flight risk' based on a Pretrial Services Report citing his extensive foreign travel, international ties, unexplained assets, and criminal history. It also outlines the seriousness of the charges against him, specifically the alleged sexual abuse of minors in New York and Palm Beach involving the facilitation by employees and associates.
DOJ-OGR-00030398.jpg
This document is a legal notice from Ricci~Leopold, P.A., dated June 18, 2008, informing all counsel that hearings scheduled for that day have been cancelled. The hearings pertained to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Defendant Haley Robson's Motion to Quash Service of Process in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, filed in Palm Beach County, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00010407.jpg
This document is page 41 of a legal filing (Doc 657) from April 2022 in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The court is rejecting the Defendant's arguments that pre-indictment delay caused a prejudicial loss of evidence, specifically noting the Defendant failed to explain the loss of government property records, proof of Epstein's residency, or flight manifests delivered by pilot Larry Visoski to Epstein's New York office. The court also dismisses arguments regarding deceased potential witnesses as vague assertions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015592.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal motion filed by Alan Dershowitz requesting a modification to a Confidentiality Order. Dershowitz argues he must be allowed to contact witnesses to verify or disprove allegations made by Virginia Roberts (Giuffre), asserting that the Plaintiffs (represented by Edwards and Cassell) may not have conducted a reasonable investigation before filing suit. The text references a previous filing from November 23, 2015, and cites case law regarding the benefits of openness in court proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014072.jpg
This document is a page from a 2014 legal academic article discussing the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details the timeline of abuse from 2001-2007 involving over 30 minors and analyzes when victim rights would attach during the investigation phases by the Palm Beach Police and the FBI in 2006. The text argues that state investigations do not trigger federal CVRA protections and notes the transition from state to federal interest when the Palm Beach Police requested FBI assistance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity