Wayne R. LaFave
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994-08-07 | Flight | Flight from SAV to SAV with passenger Wayne. Pilot: Al Gatto. | SAV to SAV | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015944.jpg
This document is a flight log from 1994, detailing numerous flights primarily involving aircraft N988JE (HS125-700) and N908JE (G1159B). Jeffrey Epstein is listed as a passenger on many of these flights, often accompanied by various individuals including Salina, Dawn Deveto, Sophie Biddle, Frances Jardine, and others identified as 'GM'. Pilots Jim Wurden and Al Gatto are frequently mentioned, with Virgil Wolfe noted as a test pilot for some flights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016510.jpg
This document is a page from a 2018 Minnesota Law Review article by Darryl K. Brown titled 'Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute.' The text discusses the legal theory behind underenforcement of criminal law, specifically citing failures to prosecute sexual assaults and racially motivated crimes. While the text does not mention Epstein, the document bears the footer 'DAVID SCHOEN' (an attorney associated with Epstein) and a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016510', indicating it was part of an evidentiary production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as legal research regarding the controversial non-prosecution agreement Epstein received.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017624.jpg
This document is a page from a legal analysis (likely a law review article or legal brief authored or submitted by David Schoen) criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that the OLC incorrectly limits the definition of 'prosecution' under the Sixth Amendment, thereby restricting when victims can assert their rights. The document was produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017623.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal text (likely a law journal article from the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) submitted as evidence in a House Oversight investigation, bearing the footer 'DAVID SCHOEN'. The text heavily critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically the OLC's 'contorted position' that victim rights only attach after formal charges are filed. It argues that this interpretation renders the statutory words 'detection' and 'investigation' meaningless and conflicts with standard definitions of when a prosecution begins.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014077.jpg
This document is page 98 of a legal text or law review article (Vol. 104) authored by 'Cassell et al.' (likely Paul Cassell). It discusses the statutory rights of crime victims across various U.S. states, specifically focusing on the requirement for prosecutors to confer with victims regarding plea negotiations and charging decisions. The text cites various state statutes (Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana) and legal studies to argue that victims' rights often attach prior to the formal filing of charges, a relevant legal argument in the context of the Epstein non-prosecution agreement controversy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014068.jpg
This document is page 89 of a 2014 legal article (likely a law review) analyzing Crime Victims' Rights, specifically critiquing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of when the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) applies. The text argues that the OLC incorrectly limits protections by claiming a complaint filing does not trigger the CVRA, and it refutes the OLC's reading of Sixth Amendment case law. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014068', indicating it was gathered as evidence during the House Oversight Committee's investigation, likely regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein plea deal and the violation of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014067.jpg
This document is page 88 of a legal text (likely a law review article by Cassell et al., Vol 104) included in a House Oversight Committee production. It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) and the Department of Justice's interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically regarding when a 'prosecution' officially begins and when victims can assert their rights. The text argues that the OLC's narrow interpretation—that prosecution only begins at indictment rather than complaint—is 'twisted' and contradicts standard criminal procedure definitions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity