| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-07-17 | N/A | Decision rendered in Wolfe v. Foreman case. | Florida (Third District) | View |
Page 8 of a legal filing in the case Edwards v. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The document is a legal argument opposing a summary judgment motion, specifically arguing that 'litigation privilege' does not protect a defendant from claims of 'malicious prosecution.' The text cites numerous Florida case precedents (Wright v. Yurko, Olson v. Johnson, etc.) to support the claim that malicious prosecution is a viable tort even in the context of judicial proceedings.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Rohrbach notifies the court that he is leaving the U.S. Attorney's Office and requests to be removed as counsel of record in the specified case.
An appellate counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell requests an extension to file the Appellant's Brief from October 14, 2022, to January 30, 2023. The reasons cited are the counsel's recent appointment, the voluminous case record, and the inability to meet with the client due to her recent transfer to a facility in Florida.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity